This qualifies as a non-surprise.
Former Democratic Rep. Ciro D. Rodriguez (1997-2005) told CQPolitics.com Tuesday that he will challenge [incumbent Rep. Henry] Bonilla and will formally announce his bid next Tuesday.That development has spurred CQPolitics.com to change its rating on the Texas 23 race to Republican Favored from Safe Republican. The new rating means that Bonilla still is highly likely to win his contest for an eighth House term, but that the possibility of a major Democratic upset now cannot be completely ruled out.
Bonilla, of course, has a pretty big advantage of his own, and I'm not talking about name recognition (which he does also have).
[Jonathan Collegio, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee,] pointed to what he said was Bonilla’s “virtually insurmountable cash-on-hand advantage.” Bonilla, who is one of the House’s strongest fundraisers, reported $2.2 million in his campaign account at the end of June.Rodriguez, by contrast, will have to rebuild his campaign treasury from scratch, following his March 7 primary loss to Cuellar.
Rodriguez’s name recognition and longtime political base in San Antonio might give him a decided edge over other Democratic candidates whom party officials said are weighing the race. They include state Rep. Pete Gallego, who represents a rural part of the 23rd, and Julian Castro, a former San Antonio councilman who narrowly lost a 2005 race for mayor of that city.
Having said all that, I would have been perfectly happy for Castro to jump in. Alas, according to the Express News, he has declared himself not a candidate - he wants to focus on the 2009 Mayoral race. I still disagree with Rodriguez here:
Rick Bolanos, a little-known Democrat who ran unopposed in the 23rd District’s now-voided March primary, is expected to refile for this race.“If we can keep it one-on-one, that’s even going to be better,” Rodriguez said.
With Castro out, there are still some other potential contenders, according to that Express News piece:
Among others who said earlier this week they're considering mounting campaigns: City Councilman Richard Perez; Richard Gambitta, a political scientist and director of the Institute for Law and Public Affairs at the University of Texas at San Antonio; and Albert Uresti, a retired San Antonio Fire Department district chief and brother of state Rep. Carlos Uresti.
I understand the logic behind a "Let 'em All In" contest with multiple Dems, but I'm not convinced that helps us in this particular race. Essentially, it starts with the premise that our path to upending Bonilla here only happens in a runoff. Whether control of Congress is at stake or not, I'm not sure I place great faith in the DCCC to outduel the NRCC ... even (hell, especially) after what should be a disasterous November for them.
Similarly, given what we've seen in Texas elections prior, who do you think is more certain to come out and vote in a runoff? ... poor, soutside San Antonians? ... or middle class-to-upscale Republicans?
Granted, Bolonas is holding firm to his stake in this race. Fine. I get that. So do the other 10 people who actually know his name. Start throwing in some bigger names, though, and it means Bonilla may have the luxury of running against an anonymous herd instead of fending off a far peskier challenge centered around an actual candidate.
Still, I find it ironic that this time around, I'm more than fine with Ciro representing what is, basically, a southside SA seat, than I was a split SA/Laredo seat. Yet the TexRoots that were so gungho for Ciro in that race are now heading for the hills.
Posted by: Greg Wythe on August 10, 2006 1:16 PMAs someone who lives in the 23rd (old and new) I really wanted Julian to run (I think he would have been a stronger challenge to Bonilla). Julian had connections to not just the southside, but also the northwest, which is where most of the votes are likely going to come from. As good a guy as Ciro is, I just think he's been around the block enough and needs to hang it up.
Posted by: SADem on August 10, 2006 1:24 PMStill, I find it ironic that this time around, I'm more than fine with Ciro representing what is, basically, a southside SA seat, than I was a split SA/Laredo seat. Yet the TexRoots that were so gungho for Ciro in that race are now heading for the hills.
Once bitten, twice shy? I think that as long as everyone, including Castro, was a theoretical possibility for this race, some people were going to hang back and see who was really in before they committed to anyone. As things stand now, I do expect the Texroots to back Ciro, though again, that doesn't mean he'll be the highest priority. We'll just have to see how it goes.
Posted by: Charles Kuffner on August 10, 2006 2:55 PMVan de Putte could make the race against Bonilla...she's not on the ballot for re-election this year--free ride, so why not?
Posted by: sa dem on August 11, 2006 8:35 AMCiro has to be the number one priority for Texas Democrats and a major priority for Democrats around the country. What were the potential gains when everybody backed Ciro against Cuellar - replace a moderate Democrat with a liberal Democrat? Big deal. Here, Democrats have a chance to replace a conservative Republican with a liberal Democrat that has eight years of seniorty in Congress! Even better, Ciro just ran a campaign in the same neighborhoods and still has his network of supporters. Email all those Kossacks from California and New York who were sending him money and tell them to double down, but this time against a Republican. Even Cuellar should write Ciro a $50,000 check.
After the beating that Texas Democrats took in redistricting, the 5th Circuit gives the Dems a golden opportunity to elect a Chicano Democrat and unify the Texas border as a Democratic stronghold. If the DNC doesn't jump on this opportunity (when the control of Congress is at stake), I really don't know what to say about them. True, Ciro is not a good campaigner, but neither is Bonilla!! This is a winnable seat.
Posted by: el_longhorn on August 11, 2006 1:55 PM