With Science Denying, Climate Collapse Denying Authoritarian Republican Robber Barons (no, make that Robber Queens and Kings) aided by the same kind of so-called Democrats, it is not just Texas that will suffer but the whole world.

Think of the money that they will give themselves and then compare it to the cost in people's lives and the cost in many trillions of dollars to inundate (by ever faster rising sea levels or ever more catagory 5 and 6 Hurricanes) the coastal cities of Texas, of America and of the World.

It would be cheaper to just pay them to go away.

We can have all the political debate we want in the future, if we plan to have a future. Do we plan to have a future? This vote for Craddick says no. These kinds of so-called Democrats and Republicans with their extinction level job performance must have challengers.

And, as I understand it one of the voting methods that Texas Representatives do not want to use, is their malfunctioning yes and no buttons, which means many favor the evidence of paper for their vote. So do we.
...........

And this is why, right here in Texas:

http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/8/46432.html

The Hillsboro Reporter
Election Complaint Under Investigation

by Art Mann

http://www.hillsbororeporter.com/default.asp?smenu=54&sdetail=7109&wpage=1&sc=10 12&hn=hillsbororeporter&he=.com

Affidavits alleging criminal conduct in Hill County's November general election has apparently initiated an investigation.

snip

Vote fraud and voter disenfranchisement are alleged, perpetuated by, but not limited to, Elections Systems and Software (ES&S) in their use of secret, uncertified software code on the electronic-voting machines purchased from the company and used by the county during the election.

It alleges that every 10th vote cast on a machine for a Democratic candidate was flipped to the Republican candidate in that race by the software.

Bodovsky said Tuesday afternoon, January 2, that the allegation was based on a pattern he detected while monitoring the recount in the county judge, treasurer and two commissioner races.

The affidavit alleges that if the 10-vote flip is proven true, Republican candidates could have gained a 20-percent advantage on machine-cast votes.

snip
...........

http://electiondefensealliance.org/

EDA Press Release / Nov. 17, 2006

Landslide Denied!

Major Miscount in 2006 Election: Were 4% of Votes "Misplaced"?

Read the Full Press Release
Read the Report
Study the Exit Poll Data

Election Defense Alliance, a national election integrity organization, issued an urgent call today for an investigation into the 2006 election results and a moratorium on deployment of all electronic voting equipment after analysis of national exit polling data indicated a major undercount of Democratic votes and an overcount of Republican votes in congressional races across the country. These findings are an alarming indictment of the American election system in which 80% of voters used electronic voting equipment.

As in 2004, the Exit Poll and the reported election results do not add up. But this time there is an objective yardstick in the methodology that establishes the validity of the Exit Poll and exposes the inaccuracy of the election returns. These findings are detailed in a paper published today on the EDA website.

The Edison-Mitofsky media Exit Poll, posted Election Night on CNN.com, had a sample base of more than 10,000 voters, and showed Democratic House candidates winning over Republicans by an 11.5 percent margin.

The reported vote count showed Democrats winning by a 7.6 margin, 3.9 percent less than the Exit Poll and far outside the poll's +/-1-percent margin of error. This discrepancy entailed at least 3,000,000 votes.

The Exit Poll was then adjusted, by a process known as "forcing," to match reported election vote totals. The final result, posted at 1:00 p.m. November 8, showed Democrats winning by a 7.6 percent margin, exactly mirroring the reported vote totals.

The objective yardstick was the proportion of respondents who indicated they had voted for Bush or Kerry in 2004. The sample in the already weighted Election Night Exit Poll had 47 percent Bush voters and 45 percent Kerry voters, a valid sample given the very conservative assumption that Republicans and Democrats turned out with equal enthusiasm in 2006. However, after the forcing process, the sample contained 49 percent Bush voters and only 43 percent Kerry supporters. This 6 percent gap is more than twice the size of the 2004 Bush win of 2.8 percent. It indicates a significant over-sampling of Republican voters in the adjusted 2006 Exit Poll.

Such a gross oversample of Republicans was necessary to match the actual vote counts, which therefore could not have been an accurate count of the actual electorate. Had the intended votes been accurately tallied, this election would have produced a Democratic landslide of epic proportions.

Read the Full Report: http://www.ElectionDefenseAlliance.org.
Read the full report:

Landslide Denied: Exit Polls vs. Vote Count 2006

................