This doesn't look good.
Short of layoffs, the city won't meet its full obligation to the municipal pension fund in the next fiscal year, Mayor Bill White says, citing rising public safety and health care costs that are expected to strain resources.In the next budget, expected to be unveiled Wednesday, White's administration will propose paying only two-thirds of the statutorily required pension contribution -- an arrangement that still would need approval from a skeptical pension fund board.
The employee retirement plan continues to be a challenge for White, who inherited a $1.9 billion unfunded liability in the pension fund when he took office in 2004.
[...]
Facing the prospect of having to make huge annual contributions to comply with state law, the city got the fund's board to agree in 2004 to reduced payments for the past three years. The contribution was to increase in this year's budget.
Douglas Benton, a vice president and senior credit officer with Moody's Investor's Service, said the city has in recent years contributed "low" amounts to its municipal pension.
"The trend in underfunding of pensions is something we've seen in other cities across the country," he said. "To say one concern or challenge would outweigh a decision on the rating assignment would not be fair."
In February, Moody's assigned Houston an Aa3 rating, a strong indicator, and assigned a positive outlook. Still, the analysis said the city's long-term expenditure challenges for pensions and other retirement benefits would require "close surveillance" in the future.
Controller Annise Parker said she's concerned the city hasn't started negotiations with the pension fund, but she said the statutorily required contribution -- roughly 24 percent of payroll -- isn't supportable.
This comment
And by the way, if you think what the city of Houston is going through is fun, at least it's trying to confront the problem.
doesn't really seem consistent with this reporting:
Controller Annise Parker said she's concerned the city hasn't started negotiations with the pension fund, but she said the statutorily required contribution � roughly 24 percent of payroll � isn't supportable.
Long, who's asked the mayor in writing for meetings but got no response, called it "disappointing and frustrating."
"We're hoping at some point that they will answer our letters, and he'll appoint somebody to sit down and have a discussion with us to try and figure out what we can do to bridge this gap," he said. "Ultimately, we're sort of coming to the end of the line here."
or this statement from HMEPS:
In addition, over the past two and a half years, HMEPS has consistently advised Mayor White, the City Council Pension Review Committee and other City representatives about the need to focus on the City�s funding plan for HMEPS beginning July 1, 2007. HMEPS sent letters to Mayor White on December 5, 2006 and March 1, 2007, notifying the Mayor that HMEPS was willing and prepared to meet and confer regarding the City�s plans to fund the required contributions beginning July 1, 2007. HMEPS has not received a response from Mayor White, nor has a designated City representative met to negotiate these matters with HMEPS. We would like to know what steps the City has taken to prepare for the upcoming funding period, which the City knew about far in advance, and which was structured this way at the recommendation of Mayor White during the 2004 meet and confer negotiations.
Confronting the problem is going to require working with HMEPS, which the city is not doing at the moment.
That's on Bill White (although we should credit Lee Brown to some extent for dumping the mess on his successor), and has NOTHING to do with Susan Combs.
Posted by: Kevin Whited on May 14, 2007 10:40 PM