John Scalzi opens a can of worms:
[W]hat makes science fiction different than every other genre of film -- what makes it unique, for better or worse -- is that a strangely high percentage of the classics of the genre are not good films; some are structurally flawed in major ways, while others are just plain awful.
There's some good discussion in the comments about the meaning of "classic" and why some of these films endure despite their faults, so check it out. What's your favorite example of a "classic" movie, from any genre, that's also an objectively crappy piece of film? Leave a comment and let me know.
Posted by Charles Kuffner on June 22, 2008 to TV and moviesMy favorite definition of a classic comes from a great essay about the "classic" science fiction books by James Wallace Harris, which could (with slight modification by me) just as easily be applied to films:
* Classics are those Works We Remember
* Classics Represent Shared Culture
* Classics Stay Available
* Classics Are Taught In School
Many of the one dollar DVDs at Wallys World are Classics
Posted by: Charles Hixon on June 22, 2008 4:08 PM