The LA Times looks at the national coalition Barack Obama built in winning the Presidency and considers the next obvious target for expansion of the political battleground.
Texas, the nation's second-most-populous state and home to 34 electoral votes, was not a 2008 presidential battleground, and Republican nominee John McCain won there by a comfortable margin. The Obama campaign spent little money there, apart from recruiting volunteers to work in other states.But strategists believe the large and growing Latino population there remains untapped, along with a large black electorate, which could make Texas competitive with a major investment of time and money from an Obama-led Democratic Party.
Similar possibilities exist in Arizona, another heavily Latino state that leans Republican, and Georgia, with a growing Latino population and a black electorate that grew from one-quarter of the overall voters four years ago to nearly one-third on Tuesday.
In turning Florida and Ohio, among other states, this year, Obama organizers focused for months not only on registering new voters but also on tracking down blacks, Latinos and young people who had been registered but never voted.
One top Obama strategist said the campaign had already sought to build the Texas state party, handing over a database with hundreds of thousands of voter names and phone numbers gathered when Obama and New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton competed in the state's Democratic primary. Much of the campaign's attention in that effort focused on Latinos in the Rio Grande Valley.
The strategist, Cuauhtemoc "Temo" Figueroa, Obama's top Latino outreach official, said the state could be taken seriously as a presidential battleground if Democrats could win statewide races there in 2010. "I don't know if it's four years or eight years off, but down the road, Texas will be a presidential battleground," Figueroa said.
Thank you for writing this. During the campaign, I got so sick of going to national blogs and hearing about how maybe Texas will turn blue in '08--all posts by people who really had no idea that the DNC has really put no resources in Texas and that you don't transform a state this large and diverse in one election cycle. (These are the same folks who, when it was revealed that 24% of Texans still thought Obama was a Muslin were all aghast about how backward our state is. Not that I'm denying that, but again, such comments fail to take into account the lack of advertising and ground game in Texas this past election.) I wholeheartedly agree that Obama showed that he could be effective where he tried to compete, but he didn't really try to compete here. I don't blame him in this election cycle, but there needs to be a long-term vision for Texas, or we will keep ceding 2 Senate Seats and 30+ electoral college votes to the Repubs in every election.
It seems that people really don't understand how much of the '08 efforts were performed by volunteer forces, which--though effective--are limited in what they can achieve. I was one of those volunteers and proud of it. But I am ready for some real attention and commitment from the party.
Posted by: elizabeth on November 11, 2008 8:07 PM