Ready for some precinct data analysis? Let's get started. There will be a lot of these entries, because there's a lot of interesting data. Today let's take a look at how Barack Obama's performance in Harris County compared to the county Democratic judicial slate, since it was conventional wisdom that as Obama went, so went the judicial hopefuls.
The first question to consider is the coattail effect. I've written before that in 2004, Republican judicial candidates lost a lot more votes compared to George Bush than Democratic candidates did compared to John Kerry. My reason for this is that if you were voting for John Kerry in 2004, you were a real true Democrat, and you went on down the line. Bush, however, seemed likely to attract voters who were only interested in his race, and that was borne out by the numbers:
2004 avg GOP 536,000, Bush 584,000, dropoff 48,000
2004 avg Dem 470,000, Kerry 475,000, dropoff 5,000
Bush may have lifted the tide for the incumbent judges in 2004, but they didn't really need it. There were plenty of Republican voters for them to win. This year, not so much:
2008 avg GOP 540,170, McCain 569,860, dropoff 29,690
2008 avg Dem 558,324, Obama 587,538, dropoff 29,214
Both judicial slates saw an equivalent dropoff from the Presidential vote. This year there were more Democrats voting overall, and that was the difference maker for most. Not for all, since there was a 44,000+ vote gap between the top Democratic judicial candidate and the bottom one, but for 23 of 27.
That's at the countywide level. Going down to the State Rep district level, you begin to see some patterns. For the most part, you'd expect the average judicial candidate to lose around 1000 votes from the Presidential level in each HD. For many of them, what actually happened was in line with that expectation, adjusted for relative levels of turnout and partisan makeup. In fact, in 17 of the 25 State House districts, the judicial candidates received a percentage of the vote that was within 1.25 points of the Presidentials. One of the eight exceptions was HD142, which is an African-American district. In HD142, where Obama received 79.78% of the vote, Democrats voted down the line at a very high rate, whereas the Republican judicials lost over ten percent of the meager vote total McCain got, from 8401 votes for McCain to 7506 for the judges. The result there was an 81.35% share for the average Democratic judicial candidate.
The remaining seven districts that defied the pattern had some shared characteristics with each other. They are:
1. The Bubba districts
In HDs 128 and 144, which cover places in eastern Harris County like Baytown and Pasadena, Barack Obama did significantly worse than the rest of the Democratic ticket:
Dist McCain Obama M Pct O Pct GOP avg Dem avg GOP % Dem %
==================================================================
128 27,322 13,973 66.16 33.84 24,621 14,542 62.87 37.13
144 23,656 16,167 59.40 40.60 21,172 16,563 56.11 43.89
2. The Hispanic districts
There are four State Rep districts in Harris County that are represented by Hispanic politicians - HDs 140 (Rep.-elect Armando Walle), 143 (Rep. Ana Hernandez), 145 (Rep-elect Carol Alvarado), and 148 (Rep. Jessica Farrar). In all four, Barack Obama received over 60% of the vote. But in three of them, the downballot Democrats did significantly better:
Dist McCain Obama M Pct O Pct GOP avg Dem avg GOP % Dem %
==================================================================
140 6,396 11,450 35.84 64.16 5,111 11,943 29.97 70.03
143 6,729 10,299 39.52 60.48 5,270 10,982 32.43 67.57
145 7,574 12,508 37.72 62.28 5,999 13,082 31.44 68.56
148 13,421 20,137 39.99 60.01 12,198 19,119 38.95 61.05
3. The Lawyer districts
Whereas those five districts showed an increase in votes for the downballot Dems over what Obama got, the last two had the exact reverse outcome:
Dist McCain Obama M Pct O Pct GOP avg Dem avg GOP % Dem %
==================================================================
134 35,430 34,740 50.49 49.51 35,977 28,357 55.92 44.08
136 37,958 19,490 66.07 33.93 37,472 16,391 69.57 30.43
And finally, since there's been so much written lately about "funny names", I present the following:
Dist Obama Pereira Pierre Mahendru Murray Mincberg Trautman
===================================================================
128 33.84 35.80 36.10 33.73 35.35 33.19 33.78
144 40.60 42.88 42.69 40.20 41.99 38.80 39.15140 64.16 70.44 69.12 66.51 67.63 64.86 64.35
143 60.48 67.53 66.37 63.60 65.29 62.29 61.03
145 62.28 69.21 67.39 64.32 65.73 62.14 61.10
148 60.01 60.55 59.46 58.74 58.50 53.42 54.23134 49.51 42.11 41.65 42.50 41.76 39.69 39.59
136 33.93 28.94 28.95 28.40 28.66 28.03 27.37Other 51.86 50.82 51.12 49.57 50.55 47.96 48.57
How's that for a start? Much more to come soon, so stay tuned.
Posted by Charles Kuffner on November 17, 2008 to Election 2008I think some of the points on Item #2 warrant comparison to 2004. In short, I don't see any hint of a PUMA problem whatsoever.
Districts 143 and 148 have some noticably Republican-leaning precincts in the district whereas the other two Hispanic seats don't. This is part of the reason why the results are somewhat dampened in their Dem support.
In looking at 2004, the districts had better Democratic support down ballot (just as they did this time around) and they also both showed improved support for the Presidential candidate.
I'm sure there are some minor disparities somewhere in a comparison with 2004, but the larger patterns look awfully familiar. My sense is that the real story in these areas may either be moderate Hispanics who vote GOP at the top of the ticket, but Dem elsewhere ... or Hispanic voters who vote GOP at the top of the ticket and just plain *don't* vote down ballot.
Posted by: Greg Wythe on November 17, 2008 11:00 AM