Here's what you see for candidates for the US Senate in Texas for the 2009-10 election cycle. I've removed the two incumbents plus candidates from previous cycles who are sitll filing finance reports.
RepublicansName Raised Spent Net Cash Debts
=======================================================
Ames Jones 49,800 30,369 164,662 0
Shapiro 34,077 99,226 310,407 16,500
Williams, M 206,335 92,377 113,957 51,426
Williams, R 348,081 90,479 388,628 200,501Total 628,293 412,451 977,654 268,427
DemocratsName Raised Spent Net Cash Debts
=======================================================
White 1,867,163 472,119 2,131,638 32,890
Sharp ??? ??? ??? ???
So, yeah, I think you can say the Democratic candidates have the early financial lead. Admittedly, Florence Shapiro is hamstrung by the current legislative session; her second quarter numbers will likely be weak as well, especially if there's a special session. I don't think it would have made that much difference, however.
And of course all this is before we take into account what John Sharp did. The FEC still doesn't have Sharp's details, but BOR's David Mauro has the scoop:
$515,155.00 - Total contributions other than loans
$514,955.00 - Net contributions other than loans
$2,001,678.10 - Loans made or guaranteed by the candidate
Now this is just the first quarter of a cycle that I believe will go on for at least two full years; more if KBH loses in either race in 2010 and decides to stick it out in DC. Maybe White can't maintain this pace, maybe Sharp can pick it up; for sure the Republicans, especially Shapiro, can do better than this. As Joe Sheehan likes to say at the Baseball Prospectus, you can't judge a team's season by the first few weeks. We'll know soon enough who will have the funds they need to compete.
Posted by Charles Kuffner on April 23, 2009 to Election 2010