Off the Kuff Rotating Header Image

More on the 288 to Medical Center connector

The more I hear about this idea, the worse it sounds.

A proposal to build a highway connector between Texas 288 and the Texas Medical Center via North MacGregor Way has drawn criticism.

Among those opposed to the flyover is the Hermann Park Conservancy, which says the elevated connector would leave Hermann Park’s new trail system in the shadow of a freeway.

“Horrible,” conservancy director Doreen Stoller said in summing up the proposal.

Among other issues, Stoller said in a written statement, the flyover would take land from the park for non-park purposes, would increase traffic and noise pollution, would cause congestion at one of the park’s major entrances and would diminish the effect of a recent $100 million park upgrade.

The $12.1 million flyover is part of a project to add toll lanes to the highway that serves as a major route between the Pearland area and downtown Houston.

As I said when I first heard about this, whatever this may do to relieve congestion outside 610, it won’t do a thing to relieve it as 288 merges into I-45 and US 59. I would also argue that it won’t do much to actually relieve congestion on the way into the Medical Center. It will mostly relocate it, from the surface streets to this flyover, which will still ultimately have to connect up with the surface streets and the Medical Center parking lots. I’m really not convinced that this thing will do any good, and that’s before you factor in the damage this design proposal could do to Hermann Park. Some years ago there was an idea that got floated to build a connector from I-10 to US 59 parallel to the West Loop, roughly running along where Weslayan is. This of course would have cut through Memorial Park, which helped to make the idea a non-starter. I hope this idea meets the same fate.

Related Posts:

3 Comments

  1. peter wang says:

    This almost sounds like an April Fools joke, except we are more than two months late

  2. B. K. Oxley (binkley) says:

    Thanks for posting this – this is the first time I’ve heard about it.

    The Hermann park observation is an aesthetic one, so I discount it. I doubt you give much weight to my observation on the ugliness of the light rail bisecting neighborhoods.

    The remark on surface streets is substantive. If the flyover lessens congestion on 288 between 610 and downtown, it serves a good purpose.

  3. […] expressed my concerns before, and I don’t really have much to add to that. At best, I think this will mostly move […]

Bookmark and Share