Texas Congressional Republicans considering a new map for 2026

WTF?

President Trump’s political team is encouraging Republican leaders in Texas to examine how House district lines in the state could be redrawn ahead of next year’s midterm elections to try to save the party’s endangered majority, according to people in Texas and Washington who are familiar with the effort.

The push from Washington has unnerved some Texas Republicans, who worry that reworking the boundaries of Texas House seats to turn Democratic districts red by adding reliably Republican voters from neighboring Republican districts could backfire in an election that is already expected to favor Democrats.

Rather than flip the Democratic districts, new lines could endanger incumbent Republicans.

But a person close to the president, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to talk publicly, nevertheless urged a “ruthless” approach and said Mr. Trump would welcome any chance to pick up seats in the midterms. The president would pay close attention to those in his party who help or hurt that effort, the person warned.

At an “emergency” meeting on Monday night in the Capitol, congressional Republicans from Texas professed little interest in redrawing their districts, according to a person briefed on the gathering who was not authorized to comment publicly. The 20-minute meeting, organized by Representative Michael McCaul, a senior member of the state delegation, focused on the White House push.

Representative Pete Sessions, Republican of Texas, said lawmakers plan to gather again to share data and “be on the same page” on the possible redrawing of the map.

“We assured each other, you need to bone up. We need to have a conversation. We need to think about what those impacts would be on the entire delegation,” Mr. Sessions said.

[…]

The maps that were drawn by the Republican Legislature in 2021, after the last census, are still being fought over, in forums including a trial that began last month in a federal court in El Paso.

But talk among Republicans of taking the task on again has been swirling around the Texas Capitol since the Legislature was in session earlier this year. The governor, the lieutenant governor and the attorney general have all discussed the possibility in recent weeks, according to a person familiar with the discussions.

In recent days, that talk has become more serious. It appeared to be driven in part by President Trump’s concern that the Republican Party could lose its slim majority in the House, derailing the second half of his term and empowering Democratic investigations of his administration.

[…]

Still, those pushing for the plan believe that Republicans could potentially pick up as many as four or five House seats in 2026, according to two of the people with knowledge of the discussions.

To do that would involve pushing Republican voters from safe Republican districts into neighboring Democratic districts to make them more competitive. In a wave year for Democrats, that could endanger incumbent Republicans as well as Democrats.

“The only way you make the state more competitive congressionally is you do it at their expense,” State Representative Trey Martinez Fischer, a San Antonio Democrat, said of congressional Republicans. “I think the Republicans have already maximized their map, given the demographic changes in the state.”

[…]

Any attempt at a mid-decade redistricting would require the Texas Legislature to approve new maps. Since the Legislature is not in session again until 2027, Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, would have to call a special session.

“From my understanding, this would be in July,” said Ron Reynolds, a Texas House Democrat from the Houston area, saying his information had come indirectly from a Republican member of the Texas House. “This is something that they’re keeping very tight-lipped.”

Gotta say, I did not see this coming. On the assumption that the gains made by Republicans among Latino voters in South Texas last year were real and not transitory, it’s not hard to imagine tweaking things in a way to make CDs 28 (Henry Cuellar) and 34 (Vicente Gonzalez) at least red-leaning. To get to four or five new seats, well, here are the next three closest blue districts:

2022


Dist  Incumbent   Dem %   GOP %
===============================
CD16    Escobar  63.46%  36.54%
CD07   Fletcher  63.79%  36.21%
CD32     Allred  65.36%  34.64%

2024


Dist  Incumbent   Dem %   GOP %
===============================
CD16    Escobar  59.50%  40.43%
CD32    Johnson  60.45%  36.97%
CD07   Fletcher  61.28%  38.72%

Eight GOP Congressfolk has percentages lower than Rep. Escobar in 2022, with three under 60%. Another two had percentages lower than Allred. 2024 was a stronger year for Republicans, as only two GOP members had lower percentages that Fletcher’s 61.28%, though another nine were within three points of her. I’m sure there’s a map out there that could endanger one or more of those folks, at least in another decent Republican year. I can’t imagine what a hellish spaghetti bowl such a map might resemble, but that’s not an issue right now. But for sure, there would be some potentially very narrow margins for a number of Republican incumbents, especially if 2026 is a good Democratic year. You know the old saying about pigs and hogs, right?

Basically, all other considerations aside, this is an exercise in risk assessment. Going after just Cuellar and Gonzalez is the least risky action on paper, but some of the Republican votes you’d need to harvest are going to come from CDs 15 and 23, which were both under 60% for the GOP in 2022 (Tony Gonzales did better in 2024 against a lesser opponent), so the downside is there as well. Beyond that, I dunno. It’s all pretty wild to consider. I’m not surprised that the Congressfolks themselves are maybe not too thrilled about this.

If this happens, it would have to happen quickly. Candidates need to be recruited and money needs to be raised, not just for the new challengers but for some number of less-secure incumbents. This will also attract a lot more Democratic action and fundraising, in a year where Dems once again have statewide dreams. There’s also a non-zero chance that a court could order a halt to any new map-drawing until the ongoing redistricting litigation has concluded. I don’t think the Republicans are stupid to consider this – evil, sure, but not stupid – but it’s a big swing and could definitely come with a steep price. Never a dull moment around here. Via the Trib.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

HISD enters its AI slop era

Ugh.

The Harlem Renaissance produced a rich tapestry of poems, novels and paintings of Black life in the early 20th century, all expressing the artistry and brilliance of people whose equal citizenship and full humanity had long been denied.

Yet this February, when eighth graders in the Houston Independent School District sat down for a lesson about the movement’s significance, they were treated to a slideshow with zero images made by Harlem Renaissance artists.

Instead, students were shown two obviously AI-generated illustrations. Both depicted Black people with missing or monstrously distorted facial features, a tell-tale sign of “AI slop.”

Buildings pictured were inscribed with gibberish, including a misspelling of the word “Renaissance.”

And when students turned to a passage about poetry and literature in the Harlem Renaissance, they found more AI-generated illustrations in the margins — but no actual poems. With strictly-timed exercises forcing students to move swiftly through a set of multiple-choice questions like those they would see on end-of-year tests, there was little time for verse.

On May 8, the HISD Board of Managers approved the controversial curriculum that contains lessons like this one for use again next year. The rubber stamp was expected, given the Board’s unstinting support for the state-appointed superintendent Mike Miles and his New Education System (NES).

But this decision is only the latest of many reasons why we — as educators at Rice University and parents of HISD students — are so concerned about the district’s direction since its takeover by the Texas Education Agency in 2023.

[…]

Little is publicly available about the content of HISD’s centrally planned curriculum, aside from the district’s decision to hire a new “artificial intelligence” company called Prof Jim to help generate worksheets, slides and reading passages for use in Miles’s schools. HISD is the company’s first school-district client.

Most Houstonians therefore remain in the dark about the district’s materials, which are already part of the curricula at all but a handful of HISD campuses. In our experience, it’s not always clear where a given lesson has come from. Elements of our own children’s curriculum this year were culled from or generated by a variety of sources, including Canva, Edmentum, Khanmigo, voronoiapp.com and flocabulary.com. More sources are listed in the district’s AI guidebook.

HISD parents, though, can see what is going on. All school-year long, in online forums and community meetings, we have shared troubling findings from our students’ computers and backpacks: worksheets riddled with errors and lifeless lessons that stifle curiosity and emphasize standardized tests.

We commiserate about the lazy misspellings in district-provided PowerPoints (Brahmins, not Bhramins!), YouTube videos of questionable origin, and generally confounding discussion questions — with incorrect punctuation to boot: “What is the exclamation point(s) to something that surprised you.”

We try to laugh about our most absurd discoveries, like the worksheet on transportation technology that asked seventh graders to analyze a picture of an automobile mashed up with a chariot — pulled by an AI-generated horse with three hind legs.

Or the one for a third-grade “Art of Thinking” class that asks students to match prompts to a chatbot’s responses and then “identify how AI positively impacts critical thinking.”

Or the Harlem Renaissance slides without Harlem Renaissance art.

All of these examples come from students and parents we personally know, but we worry over the future for all of Houston’s children as alarm bells about HISD sound.

[…]

For-profit “educational technology” companies like Prof Jim are eager to turn the crisis of public disinvestment into a money-making opportunity. In a public talk last year, the company’s CEO and founder proudly claimed that, “We are now able to use AI to automatically create things like slide decks for teachers … You just push a button.” He predicted that within 10 years, robots would be good enough to enter physical classrooms and teach.

Hell no to that. This is from a long op-ed that ran in Sunday’s print edition. Among many other things, I feel confident saying we would not be in this position of having moronic AI content in our schools if we still had elected representation. When we finally do get that back, undoing or at least very strictly reviewing and revising this bullshit needs to be a top priority. I would argue that imposing this kind of curriculum, with its associated costs, is outside the bounds of Mike Miles’ mandate. But of course he’s never felt confined by any mandate, and he can simply wave away any unfortunate obstacles. It’s going to be such a big damn celebration when he finally slinks out of town.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The weather folks are doing their best

Hold space in your hearts for them, because our safety depends to some extent on their success.

With hurricane season underway and an above-normal activity forecast, some National Weather Service offices like Houston — where as many as 44% of positions are vacant — are operating with staff shortages, prompting concerns about their capacity to monitor future storms.

The shortages stem from federal cuts that slashed roughly 10% of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s workforce and triggered a wave of early retirements. While no staff members from the Houston/Galveston office were laid off, several hundred employees at NOAA, which hosts the National Weather Service, took a voluntary early retirement package.

Among those stepping down: Jeff Evans, longtime meteorologist-in-charge in Houston, who retired after 34 years with the NWS, 10 of those in Texas. He told KPRC Click2Houston that it was “an honor and a privilege” to serve Texas through countless disasters.

The Houston office has 11 vacancies — 44% of its regular staffing.

The NWS provides weather warnings for tornadoes, hurricanes, wildfires and floods, and produces river and hydrological outlooks and long-term climate change data. It serves as the forecast of record for many, including TV meteorologists, journalists and researchers, as well as emergency managers, who use it to plan for potential evacuations and rescue coordination during extreme weather events.

Mark Fox, who usually works at the Oklahoma office, has stepped in to help as acting meteorologist-in-charge in Houston. Despite the strain, Fox and other local meteorologists say they’re committed to delivering life-saving forecasts and supporting emergency preparedness.

“We can continue 24/7 with the staff that we have,” Fox said. “If we need to augment staff to kind of help out and give some people a break, we can do that. But the mission is going to be fulfilled.”

[…]

Since the start of the year, the National Weather Service has lost nearly 600 employees due to cuts ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency under the Trump administration. After backlash, earlier this month, 126 positions, including “mission-critical” ones, were approved for hire as exceptions to a federal hiring freeze. Erica Grow Cei, a National Weather Service spokesperson, said these were approved to “stabilize frontline operations” and added that the new hires will fill positions at field offices where there’s “the greatest operational need.”

The nearly 600 employees that NWS has lost in the last six months has been about the same amount the agency lost in the 15 years prior, according to Tom Fahy, the legislative director for the National Weather Service Employees Organization, a union that represents weather service employees.

Fahy called the quick exodus unprecedented, saying it “definitely disrupts the entire staffing requirements for the National Weather Service” in a way previous reductions did not.

Jeff Masters, former NOAA Hurricane Hunter and a meteorologist who writes about extreme weather for Yale Climate Connections, says most of those roles won’t be filled in time to help this hurricane season.

“This was done very inefficiently,” Masters said. “First, all of the probationary employees were fired, then incentives were given to get the most experienced managers out through early retirement. Now they’re trying to do some rehiring, and then it’s just not being done very efficiently.”

Masters said that the local offices have lost critical institutional knowledge and expertise.

Nationwide, reduced staffing has also meant fewer balloon launches, which are essential for collecting upper-atmosphere temperature, humidity and wind speed data critical to accurate storm modeling. A reduction in launches may lead to larger errors in hurricane tracking, says Masters.

Faced with these gaps, offices across the country are lending staff — either in person or virtually — to ensure continuous coverage during major weather events. Fahy said that this is what will keep Texas as whole “in very good shape and ready for hurricane season.”

“It’s kind of like binding hands and helping each other out wherever we can,” said Jason Johnson, hydrologist in charge at the NWS Fort Worth office. “We’ve expanded our training so meteorologists and hydrologists in other regions are ready to support us if needed.”

Despite the cuts, Johnson says Texas NWS offices remain focused on protecting lives and property.

“We’re not expecting any drop in the quality or quantity of information that we provide,” he said.

See here, here, and here for some background. I’m most of the way through watching The Pitt, that HBO show about overworked emergency room doctors and nurses, and the optimism expressed in this story by NWS folks about their ability to handle whatever comes at them despite the insane workload and insufficient managerial support sounds a lot like what the folks at the Pitt would say. I trust their abilities and I’m buoyed by their faith, but we all know they shouldn’t be in this position. When something goes wrong, and sooner or later it will, don’t go blaming them.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The beer and liquor difference on THC

My head is spinning.

As Gov. Greg Abbott weighs Texas’ proposed THC ban, one industry is working overtime to influence his decision: the alcohol lobby.

Amid plunging alcohol sales, some groups representing liquor stores are opposing the ban as they see THC beverages as an opportunity to draw in more business. Beer distributors, meanwhile, launched an ad campaign in recent weeks to promote the dangers of THC.

“The beer companies would prefer a ban because they’re losing market share to THC drinks,” said Cynthia Cabrera, chief strategy officer with the hemp company Hometown Hero. “Rather than just participate in the market, they would rather do what they’ve done for 100 years and make sure that there is no competition in the beer market.”

Abbott, who is the last hurdle in Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s campaign for a statewide THC ban, is already under a ferocious onslaught of public pressure to veto the bill from veterans’ groups, hemp industry leaders and even some prominent conservative commentators. He has until June 22 to decide.

The alcohol industry wasn’t particularly loud during the committee hearings or other public debate, but has sway at the Capitol and with the governor. Abbott’s campaign treasurer is John Nau, the CEO of Silver Eagle Distributors, one of the nation’s largest beer wholesalers. The company also carries some THC beverages, according to its website. Nau has donated nearly $1.5 million directly to Abbott’s campaign since 2020, according to campaign finance data. John Rydman, the president and an owner of the Houston-based liquor store chain Spec’s, gave the governor $185,000 in that time.

Both the liquor and beer lobbies also give regularly to House and Senate members.

Alcohol distributors have long opposed decriminalization of marijuana, fearing it could siphon off their customer base amid already-declining alcohol consumption trends.

But the arrival of hemp-derived THC beverages in the last year, accounting for a growing portion of sales at liquor stores, has changed the calculus for some.

National surveys show alcohol sales have declined in recent years across multiple categories like beer and spirits. Young adults are also less likely to report consuming alcohol than in prior decades. Meanwhile, cannabis and hemp products are becoming increasingly popular.

“Liquor stores are really viewing this as a growth lever,” said Jake Bullock, CEO of the THC drinks company Cann. “As younger folks, and the whole general population, are reevaluating its alcohol consumption more broadly, liquor stores see that, they understand it.”

For the last year, Cann has sold on shelves at Total Wine & More, which has 39 stores across Texas, and has proved “extraordinarily” popular, Bullock said, outselling some established categories like chardonnay in a recent quarter. Spec’s also added delta-8 infused seltzers to its 250 stores last year.

The Texas Package Stores Association, which represents liquor distributors, recently posted graphics on X advocating against a THC ban and arguing beverages should be sold through their existing regulatory channels.

[…]

Meanwhile, groups including the Wholesale Beer Distributors of Texas launched a “Safer Texas Alliance” project in recent weeks, producing videos and advertisements arguing in favor of a ban.

See here and here for some other reactions to the ban. The Texas Hemp Business Council has collected a lot of petition signatures in favor of a veto, but who knows what Greg Abbott will do. Money talks, of course, but he’s used to bigger numbers than that. I suppose at some level I’m not sure he wants to pick this fight with Dan Patrick. We’ll know in less than three weeks.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

A former Board Manager speaks

Who knows why he and three others were streeted. But we can speculate.

Adam Rivon, one of the four recently ousted members of the Houston ISD Board of Managers, won’t speculate on why he was suddenly removed from his role this week, though he said “people are intelligent and they can make their own assumptions.”

Texas Education Agency Commissioner Mike Morath unexpectedly removed Rivon, along with three other appointees, from their roles on the Board of Managers this week, and replaced them with four new board members. Morath also announced the extension of the state intervention of the district through June 1, 2027.

In an interview with the Chronicle, Rivon said the TEA told him they “wanted to bring in a new team,” but he wasn’t given any specific reasons why they decided to remove him from the appointed board after serving in the role since the state takeover of Texas’ largest school district in June 2023.

“I was a little shocked when I was told. I think that I’d be more than happy to serve four more years or two more years, or whatever number was right, but you have to learn to control what you’re controlling,” Rivon said. “Me being upset about a thing or trying to throw gas or what have you on the situation, I don’t think that helps the students.”

[…]

Rivon, along with the other replaced board members, have almost always approved proposals from state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles’ administration, although they have voted no in a few rare occasions. Rivon said he has no regrets and went to sleep after every board meeting feeling comfortable with every decision, including all of his “no” votes.

“There were times when I was like, ‘OK, I’m gonna be the only no vote on this thing. Should I really vote no, right? It doesn’t really change anything if I vote no,’” Rivon said. “It probably, politically, would have been better if I didn’t vote no, but … I wasn’t seeking political gain through my votes.”

Rivon was one of four board members to vote against the district’s $2.1 billion budget in a narrow 5-4 vote in June 2024 — one of the school board’s first public rebukes of Miles. Rivon said he voted against the budget due to concerns about a growing deficit and feeling like the district was trying to “plug” a budget hole through future property sales.

“It was important to me that what we communicated to the stakeholders, the community and to ourselves, that we maintain the integrity of our word, and I didn’t see that happening,” Rivon said. “I didn’t see effectively that budget achieving the outcomes that we wanted and staying within the bounds that we’ve set for ourselves, so that’s why I voted no.”

Rivon said he had entered into the budget process for the 2025-26 year with the expectation of voting yes on the budget. However, he said Miles’ reform program known as the New Education System is “costly,” and he was concerned about the projected fund balance declines and HISD’s ability to achieve its objectives going forward without more spending discipline.

The planned base funding per student in the 2025-26 year is $8,566 at NES schools compared to $6,133 at non-NES schools, which doesn’t include special education funding. Much of the difference is due to higher salaries for NES teachers and the addition of “learning coaches” and “teacher apprentices” in NES schools, according to the district.

“I don’t know what adjustments they’re going to make (at) this next meeting (or) if they’re going to make any adjustments at all, but based on what was on the page, I was not comfortable with the state of the budget,” Rivon said.

See here for the background. We have understood from the beginning that the Board can’t have oversight over Mike Miles if Mike Miles can get Board members removed by asking Mike Morath to remove them. We don’t know that is what happened here – like with so many other things related to this takeover, there’s zero transparency about the processes involved – but like I said, we can speculate. If Morath and Miles would like for there to be less speculation, they are free to provide more information.

And as long as we’re singing the greatest hits here, we see again that the secret to the success of the NES program is spending a bunch more money on those schools. You get better outcomes with more resources, who could have possibly seen that coming? And hey, while I strongly approve of spending more money on our public schools, that really only works in the long term if the Legislature does its part. Which it most definitely has not done, thanks in large part to Greg Abbott. If one of the legacies Mike Miles leaves is the district’s finances in shambles and a future Board needing to make drastic cuts to stave off financial ruin, that would be bad. Having a Board in place that can ask questions and vote No when it doesn’t get satisfactory answers would help avoid that situation. Too bad that’s not what we have.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The stakes of the Tesla robotaxi debut in Austin sure are higher now

Good luck, Elmo. You’re gonna need it.

Tesla’s long-awaited entry into the robotaxi market — expected later this month — is coming to Austin, Texas, which has emerged as a key battleground for self-driving technology.

CEO Elon Musk wrote in a post on X last week that the company has been testing Model Y vehicles with no safety drivers on board in the Texas capital for several days.

Tesla’s Austin robotaxi service will kick off with 10 vehicles and expand to thousands, moving into more cities if the launch goes well, Musk said in a May 20 interview with CNBC’s David Faber.

But while the market remains nascent, Tesla already faces a hefty amount of competition.

The electric vehicle maker is one of several companies using Austin as a testing ground and debut market for self-driving technology. They’re all taking advantage of Austin’s robotics and AI talent, tech-savvy residents, affordable housing relative to other technology hubs and a city layout with horizontal traffic lights and wide roads that makes it particularly conducive to mapping software.

But the biggest reason they love Texas may be the state’s robotaxi-friendly regulation.

Already in Austin are Alphabet’s Waymo, Amazon’s Zoox, Volkswagen subsidiary ADMT, and startup Avride.

Waymo began offering robotaxi rides in Austin with Uber in March. Zoox started testing there last year, while ADMT has been testing Volkswagen’s electric ID vehicles in the city since 2023. Avride is headquartered in Austin and is testing its autonomous vehicles and delivery robots in the Texas capital, with plans to offer a robotaxi service in the city at some point.

“The winners of the space are emerging, and it’s just a matter of scaling,” said Toby Snuggs, ​​head of sales and partnerships at Avride.

According to Uber, its Austin launch with Waymo has proved successful thus far. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi told investors in May that riders are choosing the robotaxis over regular cars, and the company is preparing to scale its Austin autonomous fleet to hundreds of vehicles in the coming months, ahead of a robotaxi expansion into Atlanta later this year.

“These approximately 100 vehicles are now busier than over 99% of all drivers in Austin in terms of completed trips per day,” Khosrowshahi told investors in May.

Avride, which spun out of former parent company Yandex last year, has delivery robots in a fleet of about a dozen Hyundai Ioniq 5 vehicles in downtown Austin. The company said it plans to expand its Austin fleet to 100 vehicles later this year and aims to begin offering robotaxi rides in Dallas with Uber in 2025.

Tesla primarily relies on camera-based systems and computer vision to navigate its vehicles rather than the Waymo model of using sophisticated sensors such as lidar and radar. Tesla’s “generalized” approach to robotaxis is more ambitious and less expensive than Waymo’s, Musk said during Tesla’s first-quarter earnings call with investors in April. Musk has been promising Tesla investors that a self-driving car is on the way for roughly a decade and has repeatedly missed self-imposed deadlines.

“There’s probably a lot of ways it can be done, but we’re the only ones that have done it,” Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana told CNBC’s Deirdre Bosa in May. “We’ve been doing it 24 hours a day for almost five years. And so to us, it’s really important to focus on safety … and then cost — not cost and then safety.”

“You have to be able to see at night, you have to be able to have this vision that’s better than humans,” Mawakana said.

See here for the previous update. Didn’t realize there were that many robotaxi pilots going on in Austin right now. That’s either super awesome or a massive pain in the ass, depending on one’s perspective.

This story was from before the epic war or words between Elmo and Trump on Thursday, in which among other things President Wannabe Autocrat threatened to cut Musk and Tesla off from federal contracts. That would put a crimp in Elmo’s bottom line, and as the crown jewel in his stock price-based empire is Tesla and Tesla ain’t doing so well lately, he really needs his self-driving tech to be a big hit. Which is why it would be such a shame if nobody in Austin chose to use his shitty business, wouldn’t it? Do not engage, do not engage, do not engage.

There’s a side story here that’s worth noting, and could be a big deal for this rollout.

Tesla is test-launching about 10 to 20 autonomous Model Y vehicles in some parts of Austin, with plans to expand to a thousand within a few months. The June robotaxi debut will be invite-only at launch, so if you’re not in with the richest man in the world you’ll have to wait your turn.

Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas visited Tesla’s Palo Alto office in California and learned that the robotaxis will be teleoperated with remote operators watching the vehicles through embedded cameras, to control it incase it gets stuck, Business Insider reports.

There will also be “audio inputs” to pick up siren sounds from emergency vehicles, a Tesla rep said in an April earnings call.

The robotaxis will rely on Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. Both have been linked to hundreds of nonfatal incidents, while Autopilot has been connected to 51 reported fatalities and FSD has been linked to at least two deaths as of October 2024, The Verge reports. In early May, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration raised questions about Tesla’s (FSD) technology to learn more about its development before its use in robotaxis.

More specifically, the NHTSA wanted to know how well the vehicles will operate in bad weather or reduced roadway visibility conditions such as sun glare, fog, dust, rain, and snow. NHTSA gave Tesla a June 19 deadline to submit this information.

The agency has been investigating crashes involving Teslas (FSD) feature for years, with two deaths having linked to the technology, according to the Verge. More recently, a Tesla vehicle using its latest FSD reportedly ran over a child-size mannequin crossing in front of a stopped school bus.

Tesla seems to be particularly worried about the public knowing some of the details about its safety record.

Tesla is trying to prevent the city of Austin, Texas, from releasing public records to Reuters involving the EV maker’s planned launch of self-driving robotaxis in the city this month.

The news agency in February requested communications between Tesla and Austin officials over the previous two years. The request followed CEO Elon Musk’s announcement in January that Tesla would launch fare-collecting robotaxis on Austin public streets.

Austin public-information officer Dan Davis told Reuters on April 1 that “third parties” had asked the city to withhold the records to protect their “privacy or property interests.” Austin officials on April 7 requested an opinion on the news agency’s request from the Texas Attorney General’s office, which handles public-records disputes.

On April 16, an attorney for Tesla wrote the AG objecting to the release of “confidential, proprietary, competitively sensitive commercial, and/or trade secret information” contained in emails between Tesla and Austin officials. The Tesla attorney wrote that providing the documents to Reuters would reveal “Tesla’s deployment procedure, process, status and strategy” and “irreparably harm Tesla.”

Tesla and the Texas Attorney General’s office did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.

Neal Falgoust, who oversees public records issues for Austin’s Law Department, said the city “takes no position on the confidential nature of the information at issue” but is required to seek the Attorney General’s opinion when “a third-party asserts that their information is proprietary and should not be released.”

[…]

In an April 23 response to Tesla’s letter, a Reuters lawyer wrote that Tesla’s intent to deploy the unproven technology on Texas roadways makes its plans “an issue of enormous importance to Texas and the public at large” and underscored the public’s right to know.

Falgoust, the Austin law department official, did not respond to questions about whether the public was entitled to information about Tesla’s driverless technology.

Texas state law requires the Attorney General’s office to decide within 45 business days, which would be next week.

I feel like Trump Bestie Elon Musk would get concierge service from the AG’s office on this request. But Trump Sworn Enemy/Bitter Ex Elon Musk, probably not so much. I can’t wait to see how this turns out. But whichever way this goes, all you need to know is not to use this service. Let Elmo flail. Let him deal with the consequences of his actions. Do not engage.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gina Ortiz Jones wins SA mayoral runoff

Good.

Gina Ortiz Jones

San Antonio’s next mayor will be Gina Ortiz Jones, a 44-year-old West Side native who rose from John Jay High School to the top ranks of the U.S. military on an ROTC scholarship.

Jones defeated Rolando Pablos, a close ally of Texas GOP leaders, 54.3% to 45.7% Saturday night in a high-profile, bitterly partisan runoff.

Thanks to new longer terms that voters approved in November, this year’s mayor and council winners will be the first to serve four-year terms before they must seek reelection.

The closely watched runoff came after Jones took a commanding 10-percentage-point lead in last month’s 27-candidate mayoral election, but weathered nearly $1 million in attacks from Pablos and his Republican allies.

At the Dakota East Side Ice House, a beaming Jones said she was proud of a campaign that treated people with dignity and respect.

She also said she was excited that San Antonio politics could deliver some positivity in an otherwise tumultuous news cycle.

“With everything happening around us at the federal level and at the state level, some of the most un-American things we have seen in a very, very long time, it’s very heartening to see where we are right now,” she said shortly after the early results came in.

When it became clear the results would hold, Jones returned to remark that “deep in the heart of Texas,” San Antonio voters had reminded the world that it’s a city built on “compassion.”

Chappell Roan’s “Pink Pony Club” blared over the speakers to the roughly 250 supporters celebrating with drinks on a hot spring evening.

At Pablos’ watch party, he said Jones’ overwhelming victory surprised him. The conservative Northside votes he was counting on to carry him didn’t wind up materializing.

“The fact is that San Antonio continues to be a blue city,” Pablos told reporters at the Drury Inn & Suites’ Old Spanish Ballroom near La Cantera. “This [race] became highly partisan, and today it showed.”

I was not following this very closely, partly because of the end of the legislative session, but in the last week or so there were concerns being expressed about Ortiz Jones underperforming, Pablos generating a bunch of excitement among Republican voters, and on and on. There was a lot of money being poured into the race, former Mayor Ron Nirenberg and many of the Democratic former Mayoral candidates declined to endorse in the runoff, Pablos is a Greg Abbott minion – the avalanche of takes that would have followed a Pablos victory would have swept us all into the Ship Channel. I found this reaction from one of the race-watchers to be particularly interesting.

Some 17% of San Antonio’s registered voters turned out for Saturday’s runoff, rivaling the turnout for the hotly contested 2021 matchup between Mayor Ron Nirenberg and Greg Brockhouse. The number far exceeded analysts’ expectations.

“Originally, it looked like Pablos did a good job getting people to turn out in early voting, but [Jones] actually won that by a lot — and she also won election-day voting,” UTSA political scientist Jon Taylor told the Current. “I’m truly surprised.”

Despite his close alignment to Abbott, who’s unpopular in San Antonio, Pablos portrayed himself not as a culture warrior but as a fiscal conservative focused on economic development, crime and poverty reduction.

“I will continue to serve this community with pride,” Pablos told supporters at his campaign watch party. “We want the best for this community and for our families.”

While Jones racked up a convincing victory, her campaign was anything but smooth sailing.

The candidate took heat for not speaking to the media following the May 3 general election, and the Pablos campaign raised allegations that she used her cell phone to cheat during a televised debate.

Although outside partisan money flowed into both races, Pablos had a considerable financial advantage and the backing of a deep-pocketed Abbott-tied PAC. The candidate and his allies used that funding for $1 million in ad buys, including a spate of negative spots about Jones.

However, in the end, the Jones campaign brought together a diverse, citywide coalition that erased the spending difference, UTSA’s Taylor said. During her watch party, Jones thanked a litany of progressive organizations ranging from the Texas Organizing Project to Vote Vets to San Antonio LGBTQ+ groups for getting out the vote.

“They had a really good mobilization effort, and they brought in a lot of organizations that are really good at getting people to the polls,” Taylor said.

What’s more, anger about the Trump administration’s increasingly extreme immigration policies, combined with concerns about what some speculate is the homophobic killing of San Antonio actor Jonathan Joss, may have boosted Election Day turnout in Jones’ favor, Taylor speculated.

“Those issues came up late [and] I’m not sure they impacted all the voters, but it was definitely in the background,” he said. “I think ultimately, this a blue city, and we defaulted to a blue candidate for mayor.”

I for one would like to get a better understanding of why the early vote seemingly looked (*) much better for Pablos than it turned out to be. I’m willing to bet a reasonable number of the early voters have a primary voting history, so was there something off about the data or was it just misinterpreted? I don’t want to overinterpret anything, I just want to understand what the surprise was.

Be that as it may, congratulations to Mayor-elect Gina Ortiz Jones. I wish you all the best over the next four years. The Current has more.

(*) From that Downballot story:

The lone public poll of the runoff, released on Thursday by the Democratic firm Chism Strategies, simultaneously offered hope and flashed warning signs for Jones. The survey found Jones ahead 50-41, but among those who said they’d already voted, Jones was up just 49-47. Early voters, says the pollster, “were significantly more Republican” in the second round compared to the first, making it harder for Jones to make up ground on Election Day, when the electorate tends to lean to the right.

It’s very hard to poll low-turnout races, because it’s difficult to accurately model what the electorate looks like. This poll was actually quite accurate, as it would predict something like a 55-45 race, which is very close to the final result. It was on the “already voted” sample where it was less accurate; sample size probably had something to do with that. I’m sure that part of the result colored people’s perspectives on the early vote, whereas if it had just been “Ortiz Jones leads by nine in this one poll” it likely would have drawn a shrug. I’d put it down as yet another reason to limit how far one should go with a single poll result, especially on a smaller sample.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

You’ll get to vote on some unsustainable tax cuts this November

Get out your figurative credit card, we’re about to put a big charge on it for our future selves to pay.

Voters will be asked to approve property tax cuts for Texas homeowners and businesses in November.

If voters agree, homeowners will see increased breaks on the taxes they pay toward school districts, with those above the age of 65 or living with disabilities seeing even bigger cuts, if Texas voters approve them in November. Business owners will get help, too, on the taxes they pay on their inventory.

Gov. Greg Abbott, a champion of tax cuts, said Friday he plans to sign the deal, one more procedural step before the fall election. Abbott urged voters to approve the increases.

“Never before has the Texas Legislature allocated more funds to provide property tax relief than they did this session,” Abbott said in a news release.

Texas lawmakers plan to put $51 billion toward cutting property tax cuts — maintaining ones enacted in previous years as well as enacting new ones — over the next two years. That’s a gargantuan figure, state budget analysts and some lawmakers worry will come back to haunt the state. Legislators tapped once-in-a-lifetime multibillion-dollar budget surpluses, the result of inflation and massive influxes of federal stimulus dollars during the COVID-19 pandemic, to pay for tax cuts in recent years.

Those federal dollars are all but spent. Though Texas’ economy is healthy, it has slowed. Uncertainty around the Trump administration’s back-and-forth tariff policies, lower levels of immigration, lower oil prices and federal spending cuts could make matters worse for the state’s economy, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas said in May.

The state budget, which lawmakers approve every two years, could take a hit as a result, said Shannon Halbrook, a fiscal policy expert at the left-leaning Every Texan. Tax cuts may not be on the chopping block, but other government services would be.

“I don’t think we’re going to have a lot of extra money lying around next time,” Halbrook said. “The conversation is not going to be, ‘how do we spend all this extra revenue?’ It’s going to be, ‘How do we deal with a really tight environment? What do we cut? How do we go from here?’”

Texans who own their home are slated to see a boost in the state’s homestead exemption, or the slice of a home’s value that can’t be taxed to pay for public schools. Lawmakers raised the exemption from $100,000 to $140,000.

The owner of a typical Texas home — valued at $302,000 last year, according to Zillow — would have saved about $490 on their school property taxes had the higher exemption been in place last year, a Tribune calculation shows. Those savings result from a combination of the increased homestead exemption and $2.6 billion in cuts to school tax rates in the state’s upcoming two-year budget.

That one I’ll vote for, I approve of raising the exemption as it provides more benefit for people on the lower end of the property scale. The rest I’ll vote against, they’re the ones that will really put our future revenue to the test. I have no illusion that my vote will be part of a majority – these will likely pass with more than 70% of the vote – but one does what one must. Good luck, and as many dope slaps as appropriate, to the future legislators who will be left wondering how we got into this predicament.

(Yes, I agree, handling tax rates via Constitution and referendum is dumb. Yes, I agree, our Constitution itself is a ridiculous overstuffed hodgepodge of things that don’t belong in a properly written Constitution. No, it’s never going to be reformed, I’m not going to waste time worrying about it.)

Posted in Election 2025, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s more than just FEMA

The 2025 hurricane season is underway. It won’t be just the storms that determine how bad it is.

FEMA leads the federal response when disaster strikes. It coordinates rescue efforts, provides temporary housing and medical help, and offers financial assistance to repair homes or elevate them above flood levels. Its goal is to ensure that survivors have a safe place to stay and the means to rebuild.

Harris County is one of the state’s most disaster-prone areas and depends increasingly on FEMA resources. After Hurricane Beryl last July, more than 650,000 Harris County residents applied for FEMA aid, the most in over 20 years.

But federal disaster assistance does not stop with FEMA.

HUD offers grants to help local governments buy out flooded homes and rebuild in safer locations. Farmers and ranchers can seek emergency loans from the Department of Agriculture to replace lost crops and repair equipment. The Army Corps of Engineers may be called on to strengthen levees, clear debris from bayous and fix clogged drainage ditches.

The Department of Education provides recovery grants to help reopen classrooms when school buildings are damaged. The Small Business Administration offers low-interest loans to homeowners, renters and small businesses so they can begin repairs shortly after an extreme weather event.

Other federal agencies go beyond immediate relief and help communities like Houston prepare for disasters and improve long-term resilience.

The Environmental Protection Agency provides research grants and technical support to manage stormwater. The National Weather Service issues forecasts and flood warnings so residents can evacuate in time. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration funds studies on coastal erosion and sea-level rise, giving local planners data to predict the impact of future disasters.

These programs are crucial to tackling chronic flooding, water quality issues and other enduring environmental threats, according to Matthew Tejada, senior vice president of environmental health at the Natural Resources Defense Council. He previously led Air Alliance Houston, a local environmental advocacy group.

“They are some of the toughest challenges we face in the United States. They impact people’s health. They foreshorten their lives. They minimize their economic prosperity. That has impacts for our entire society,” Tejada said. “These are problems that are not going away.”

We’ve discussed this before. We may or may not feel the effect here, but someone will somewhere – it’s a matter of when and not if. The chaotic and disorganized response to Hurricane Katrina twenty years ago contributed to the steep decline in then-President Bush’s popularity and led the way to some major political change. I have no idea what could happen this time. It might not be anything, if this winds up being a not-so-bad hurricane year or if there’s enough of a visible response to hide everything else. But there will be suffering and long-term damage, and we won’t know what it is until it happens. Hope for the best, because it could be really bad.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Weekend link dump for June 8

“To put it simply, Elon Musk’s brief time in Washington made American life worse, with actions that will continue to reveal the true extent of their immense damage for years to come.”

“Exclusive State Department records show: As the Trump administration abandons its humanitarian commitments, diplomats are reporting that the cuts have led to violence and instability while undermining anti-terrorism initiatives.”

“As I said, I’d love it if Musk failed. But he didn’t. He accomplished a ton. He ran an anti-constitutional blitzkrieg through the federal government, did massive harm, violated a slew of criminal laws. And he only tired of his antics when the reputational harm to his companies became steep enough to really endanger them. He’s a destructive crook who needs to be held accountable for his actions. And that’s exactly what this press roll-out, along with gauzy interviews, is all about thwarting.”

“Hundreds of ‘DEI’ books are back at the Naval Academy. An alum and a bookshop fought their removal.”

“Call Centers Replaced Many Doctors’ Receptionists. Now, AI Is Coming for Call Centers.”

“The Trump administration is making the country less safe for domestic violence victims”.

“As American cities have grown in size and population and gotten hotter, they — not the federal government — have become crucibles for climate action: Cities are electrifying their public transportation, forcing builders to make structures more energy efficient, and encouraging rooftop solar. Together with ambitious state governments, hundreds of cities large and small are pursuing climate action plans — documents that lay out how they will reduce emissions and adapt to extreme weather — with or without support from the feds.”

“Shari Redstone better change her tune, or she, her board, and her corporate officers may go to prison on bribery charges in 2029.” Or even sooner than that.

Let them fight.

“Support for the law firms that didn’t make deals has been growing inside the offices of corporate executives. At least 11 big companies are moving work away from law firms that settled with the administration or are giving—or intend to give—more business to firms that have been targeted but refused to strike deals, according to general counsels at those companies and other people familiar with those decisions.”

From the “they can dish it out but they sure can’t take it” department.

RIP, Valerie Mahaffey, Emmy-winning actor who was on a ton of shows including more recently on Young Sheldon and Dead to Me.

RIP, Jonathan Joss, actor known for King of the Hill and Parks and Recreation.

“One of the constants in the evolution of the openly gay athlete in the major North American men’s professional sports leagues — the NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL and MLS — is that everyone who comes out is providing a for-free blueprint for those who dare to be next.”

“The first is that even very positive technological revolutions (say, the Industrial Revolution) end up hurting a lot of people. Second, this revolution is coming to us under the guidance and ownership of tech billionaires who are increasingly wedded to and driven by predatory and illiberal ideologies. Both those facts make me think that we should approach every new AI development from a posture of skepticism, even if some or most may end up being positive. Trust but verify and all that.”

“We’ve overproduced [computer science] degrees without addressing how exploitative and gatekept the tech hiring pipeline has become. Entry-level roles are vanishing, unpaid internships are still rampant, and companies are offshoring or automating the very jobs these grads trained for.”

“The [Council for Christian Colleges & Universities] makes a lot of noise about defending its “religious freedom” but as Trump and Rubio explicitly restrict that freedom, they seem content to sit back and take it. OK, then.”

RIP, Betsy “Sockum” Jochum, last surviving original player from the All American Professional Girls Baseball League, who debuted with the 1943 South Bend Blue Sox. The AAGPBL Facebook page has more.

“[Former University of Michigan President Santa] Ono will no longer be a top educator at the biggest, most beloved schools we have. But if his former colleagues are paying attention, he has at least offered them one parting educational gift. Ono is proof that there is no length the leadership of the country’s crown-jewel universities can go to that will convince right-wing assailants to give them a soft landing. Ono played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.”

“The tale of how smart toilet startup Throne landed its seed round is so full of serendipities, one could almost believe it was orchestrated by the hand of Fortuna, Roman goddess of providence.” They’re in Austin, I found this link via the daily email from CityCast Austin. Lance Armstrong is an investor. It actually sounds useful, but OMFG.

RIP, Edmund White, prolific and pioneering gay author.

“I cannot think of anything like this level of politicization being formally introduced into the hiring process. Under the George W. Bush administration, it was a scandal when appointees in the Justice Department were caught scanning candidate CVs for civil servant positions to try to discern their political leanings. Now they will just ask them to explain how they can serve President Trump’s agenda. Within the space of a generation, backdoor politicization practices went from being a source of shame to a formal policy.”

“For decades, the FBI and the Justice Department have been the main enforcers of laws against political corruption and white-collar fraud in the United States. In four months, the Trump administration has dismantled key parts of that law enforcement infrastructure, creating what experts say is the ripest environment for corruption by public officials and business executives in a generation.”

RIP, Shigeo Nagashima, Japanese baseball icon known as “Mr. Pro Baseball” in Japan.

Everyone has a story. You ask them where they live, where they work and there’s usually something interesting. We’re writing human-interest stories with [Shohei] Ohtani as a cover.” That’s from an LA Times story about the Japanese sportswriters who track down and write stories about the fans who catch Ohtani home run balls.

RIP, Jim Marshall, Hall of Fame defensive lineman mostly for the Minnesota Vikings, one of the “Purple People Eaters”, held the NLF record for consecutive games played with 282.

“The US Institute of Peace Digs Out of Under DOGE’s Weed Stash and Tries to Rebuild”.

“Now, here’s a story you don’t see every day. London-based AI startup Builder.ai has filed for bankruptcy after it was discovered that its “AI” services were secretly operated by a team of 700 human employees in India, masquerading as AI chatbots.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

The THC ban and the Houston retail market

Wow.

PXL_20250605_164839719

The bright lights of Bahama Mama’s flagship store along Lower Westheimer turned on a year ago, welcoming passersby into a hemp shop unlike anything else in Houston. A red carpet rolled into a mirrored showroom stocked with nearly every type of legal hemp product and accessory imaginable. A Las Vegas-like mix of color, chrome and cannabis culture gave the 5,000-square-foot boutique an Instagram-ready vibe.

The bold design reflected Bahama Mama’s even bolder real estate strategy. Over the past five years, the company has filled more than 115,000 square feet across 85 stores in Texas, including more than 50 in Houston. CEO Greg Laird said the brand pays about $7 million in rent and $3 million in sales taxes annually in Texas.

All of that could disappear if Gov. Greg Abbott does not veto Senate Bill 3, which would ban hemp-derived THC and nearly all CBD products starting on Sept. 1. Although Bahama Mama holds a large stake in each store, they are jointly owned with the independent operators who personally invest in their shops.

“That’s 85 operators who could lose their livelihoods (across Texas),” Laird said, in addition to their 200 Houston-based employees.

Bahama Mama is just one of thousands of shops in Texas facing this potential wipeout. The hemp industry has ballooned into a sector with $5.5 billion in annual sales supporting about 53,000 jobs across 8,500 businesses, according to a recent Whitney Economics report.

In the Houston area, more than 1,500 businesses are licensed to sell hemp, according to a Chronicle analysis of Texas State Department of Health Services data. About 400 of those are smoke or vape shops that rely heavily on hemp products.

Most of those 400 stores could be forced to close if the ban takes effect, dumping between 600,000 and 815,000 square feet of retail space into the market. That equates to roughly the square footage of Toyota Center. While that is a tiny piece of Houston’s 446 million-square-foot retail space market, for the tenants who fill those spaces, the shutdown could be devastating.

The fallout will be felt most sharply by tenants and small business owners who may lose their stores, investments and life savings. Meanwhile, landlords will be left scrambling to backfill space or resolve lease disputes.

[…]

Most tenants can’t simply walk away. Many signed personal guarantees, allowing landlords to pursue personal assets if rent isn’t paid. That puts homes, savings and vehicles at risk.

Melanne Carpenter, co-owner of Serenity Organics in Missouri City, said her landlord leased to her in part because she had a corporate job and signed a personal guarantee. She and her husband took out a business loan, which they’re still repaying. Her $4,300 monthly rent is sustained by a loyal customer base of mostly suburban parents who use hemp for anxiety, insomnia and chronic pain.

Tucked in a strip center near Chick-Fil-A, Serenity Organics has a spa-like design. Nearly all wellness products, from tinctures to dog treats, contain trace amounts of THC. If SB 3 is signed, she’ll likely close Aug. 31.

Carpenter, who is also a retail real estate agent, expects a wave of defaults.

“You’re talking about a lot of empty space. It’s going to affect landlords, because they’re going to have vacant space, and they’re going to have it very, very quickly.”

The uncertainty comes just as she’s weighing whether to renew her lease. This time, she’s trying to negotiate an exit clause, something her original lease didn’t include.

Some tenants secured exit clauses allowing them to break leases if regulations change. But these clauses aren’t universal, especially if landlords used boilerplate language in the lease. And some tenants didn’t know to ask for an exit clause.

At the aggregate level, this is a small piece of the real estate market, which is currently in good shape and likely can withstand the hit. But that’s still a lot of people who are going to be unemployed or in the lurch financially as a result. You know what I think should happen next, whether Abbott does veto this bill or not. That’s primarily going to be on campaigns and candidates, but if you frequent one of those 400+ locations, you might mention to the owner and/or the employees who they can thank for their current situation.

Side note #1: I wonder how much of that $5.5 billion in annual sales is within Houston specifically. Whatever happens to the real estate, that could be a significant short-term blow to our sales tax revenue.

Side note #2: There are now two of these shops within walking distance of my house. I can’t say they add anything to the character of the neighborhood, but whatever, they’re there and they don’t seem to be a problem. I don’t think either of them has been there for much more than a year. The law that (inadvertently) allowed these shops to open was passed in 2019. I wonder what percentage of these places are more than, say, three years old.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Humble ISD candidate challenges her disqualification

This story isn’t over yet.

Meanwhile, former trustee-elect Brittnai Brown has challenged the notion stipulated in a lawsuit against her that she did not reside in Humble ISD for the required six months before the filing deadline to run for office.

The district found Brown was ineligible because she was not a registered voter in Humble ISD before the filing deadline, despite living in the area.

Brown said she updated her voter registration a few hours before filing for office, with the understanding that when she received a confirmation from the website that she had initiated her address change, that meant she had taken the appropriate measures.

“Verifying both residency and voter registration falls under the shared responsibility of the election administrator and the district. As a candidate, I followed all stated procedures and submitted documentation in good faith,” Brown said in an email to the Houston Chronicle.

It takes up to 30 days for voter registration to become valid after a person changes their address, meaning that Brown’s registration was not technically valid until one month after the filing deadline. She said she was not aware of this discrepancy. Humble ISD representatives had previously said that they had not previously encountered an issue with voter registration of candidates before.

“I chose to run because I believe in the power of education to transform lives. My goal in running for the school board was to ensure that every student regardless of background receives a quality education in a safe, supportive learning environment,” Brown said.

The candidate who filed the challenge against Brown’s candidacy, Tracy Shannon, had asked in her lawsuit to be named victor since she received the second highest number of votes, but district counsel said last month that the only legal recourse they could take in the wake of Brown’s ineligibility was to have the current trustee, Ken Kirchhofer, stay on until the board decides how to fill the vacant seat, either by appointment or by a special election.

Shannon said that she would await which option the board chose for filling the seat, and added that “this whole issue highlights some need to change the law to clarify that the election authority needs to have some responsibility to determine eligibility beyond looking at the application.”

See here for the background. The first half of that story was about a recount that I wasn’t interested in. I appreciate the explanation that candidate Brown provided, but it’s not clear to me that even if it’s accepted it would re-qualify her. The original story didn’t specify when Brown updated her registration but said it was likely around the time of the filing deadline, which is generally around ten weeks before the election. That’s still not enough time to meet the “registered to vote in Humble ISD six months before the election” rule. She may be saying she was living in Humble ISD before then and perhaps her voter registration just hadn’t been updated in a timely fashion to reflect that, but if that’s the case I would think she’d need to sue to challenge the six-month requirement for it to matter. I Am Not A Lawyer, etc etc etc, so who knows what comes next. The Humble board didn’t take it up in their June 3 meeting, but their next meeting is this Tuesday, and one way or another they have to decide what to do with that seat. I’ll keep an eye on it.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wisk gives a virtual demo

I’d want to see the real thing, but I suppose that wasn’t practical under the circumstances.

Saemi Poelma eagerly posed for a photo Tuesday inside a model autonomous air taxi, impressed by the possibility of a new way of traveling without a human pilot.

“This is something that we all imagined as kids,” Poelma said.

The sleek, self-flying aircraft drew a crowd of curious onlookers at the George R. Brown Convention Center. Wisk Aero, a California-based air mobility company, showcased the air taxi at the 2025 Xponential Conference. The company plans to establish the transit in the greater Houston area by the end of the decade.

Wisk signed a 12-month agreement with the Houston Airport System and the city of Sugar Land last year to support the strategic planning efforts needed to launch the new form of air transportation.

Wisk’s collaboration with Houston Airports and Sugar Land consisted of identifying and assessing potential locations for developing infrastructure for air taxi operations at George Bush Intercontinental Airport, William P. Hobby Airport, Ellington Airport and Sugar Land Regional Airport.

“I do believe that with this new technology in the aviation industry, people are going to be able to travel to farther places quicker, and it’ll also help alleviate some of that traffic,” said Elizabeth Rosenbaum, assistant city manager of the city of Sugar Land, who also attended the convention.

Wisk also plans to extend the agreements with both cities, according to Emilien Marchand, director of ecosystems partnerships.

[…]

The company revealed proposed flight pathways to the Houston Chronicle, showing six vertiport locations in the Houston area and nine routes.

Marchand said Wisk has been collaborating with the Houston Airports and the Federal Aviation Administration to determine the best places to land the aircraft without affecting commercial traffic.

“No routes have yet been approved by the FAA,” he said.

Wisk offered attendees a chance to wear virtual reality headsets to simulate riding in the aircraft traveling from the center to IAH. From the sky, attendees could see Daikin Park and the nearby Marriott Hotel in downtown Houston.

The virtual experience also showed examples of how the vertiport would look on top of the center or near the airport during landing or takeoff.

See here, here, and here for some background. Wisk is not the only eVTOL aiming to operate in Houston, but they were there providing their virtual rides, so they get the story. I don’t know how convincing a virtual reality demo ride is – I mean, you can take a VR ride on the Millennium Falcon at Disneyland – but it’ll have to do for now.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Measles update: There’s nowhere to go but down

What a depressing headline.

Amid a widespread decline in childhood measles vaccination rates since before the COVID-19 pandemic across the United States, a study published Monday found that coverage can vary substantially within a state.

Looking at county-level data in 33 states, researchers at Johns Hopkins University found that the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccination rate decreased from 93.92% in the 2017-2018 school year to 91.26% in the 2023-2024 school year. Other states were not included because they had missing vaccination data, the authors of the study said.

Of the 2,066 counties the study looked at, 78% saw a decline in vaccination rates. Only four of the 33 states — California, Connecticut, Maine and New York — saw an increase in the average county-level vaccination rate, the study found.

The data shows significant diversity in the levels of vaccination within and across states, which the authors of the study say could “help inform targeted vaccination strategies.”

[…]

The CDC has also reported state-level declines in vaccination coverage for kindergartners by school year, saying the rate among U.S. kindergartners has decreased from 95.2% during the 2019-2020 school year to 92.7% in the 2023-2024 school year.

It sure would be nice to have a federal government that had a strategy for improving vaccination rates, wouldn’t it? The one grimly optimistic thing I can think of to say here is that we have seen an uptick in measles vaxxes in Texas since this outbreak began. Nothing quite focuses the mind like the specter of actual risk. It may be a blip, but against that we’re almost certain to see more outbreaks like this, so maybe there will be more of the resulting boosts. Depressing, but it is what it is.

Pull up a chair, make yourself comfortable, and practice some deep breathing as you read this.

Sick children began showing up at Texas hospitals in January.

Dr. Leila Myrick was on call when the first child landed in Seminole’s emergency room, where she consulted a medical textbook to confirm measles, a disease she had never actually seen.

Myrick had moved her family from Atlanta to Seminole in 2020, drawn by the promise of small-town medicine in a city cut out of the desert, a conservative but diverse community where many of her patients were Mennonite and Latino. She had taken care of their families in the five years since — through Covid and baby deliveries and everything in between. A framed poster of Myrick cradling newborns hangs in the hallway outside her office.

Measles now threatened these children, and Myrick did what she could to persuade parents to vaccinate them. She gave interviews, answered calls on a local German-language radio show, stayed late at her clinic and worked weekends at the hospital.

But her message faced competition.

Children’s Health Defense, the country’s largest anti-vaccine nonprofit, has downplayed the danger of measles for decades, falsely calling it benign and beneficial to the immune system. Seminole’s outbreak didn’t deter the group, which wrongly suggested it had been caused by a local vaccination campaign and then floated other contradictory theories: that the vaccines were failing, shedding the measles virus, or perhaps working too well, leading somehow to a super virulent strain.

Myrick watched her neighbors repeat these distortions in a local Facebook group, “Seminole TX Residents NEED to KNOW,” sometimes naming her directly.

“Every doctor that pushes the jabs gets commission from the big Pharma,” one woman wrote.

In late February, the Gaines County library posted a flyer “kindly” asking that unvaccinated and measles-sick patrons not come in. By the evening, after an outcry in the comments, the library removed the post.

“I see a vulnerable population getting fed the wrong information and making decisions for their children’s health based on wrong information,” Myrick said. “And I feel helpless.”

Responsibility for managing the outbreak fell on Zach Holbrooks, executive director of the South Plains Public Health District.

Holbrooks grew up in Seminole and after stints in Lubbock and Austin moved back in 2008 to lead public health across four counties. Run on about $2 million in grants a year, the health department’s responsibilities are broad — vaccines and family planning, but also disaster response, fire protection, food safety, landfills, inspections, permits and more.

Holbrooks didn’t see measles coming, though he is quick to say he probably should have — vaccine exemptions in Gaines County had more than doubled in the last 10 years, and about 1 in 5 kindergarteners were now skipping the shots.

When the first cases were confirmed at the end of January, “my heart sank,” Holbrooks said.

The district kept only a couple of doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines on hand — enough for new families moving into the area, not to meet the sudden need of an outbreak. The two epidemiologists Holbrooks had on staff were immediately overwhelmed by case investigations. Holbrooks also didn’t have outreach materials in Low German or a relationship with the Mennonite community, which he now urgently needed a way into.

He turned to the state, which brought in nurses, testing supplies and vaccines. He set up a vaccine and testing clinic outside Seminole Hospital District; a spray-painted arrow on unfinished plywood signaled where to go.

Billie Dean, a nurse and site leader at the clinic, remembered one Mennonite woman who drove by every day in a compact gold car.

“We would see her pull in, and we were like, ‘Oh, she’s back,’” Dean said. Each day, they told her how many people had gotten vaccinated the day before, how none had come back with side effects. After two weeks, she rolled down her window and said she was ready. A few days later, she came back with her daughter and grandson.

Holbrooks printed flyers in English, Spanish and, with the assistance of a local author, Low German, to distribute at grocery stores, libraries, post offices and churches, and he gave updates on the local TV and radio stations.

Still, cases in the area ticked up, nearly doubling in a week to 80, a sure undercount, since officials knew many people weren’t being tested. In a letter published in February in The Mennonite Post, a German-language newspaper, a married Seminole couple reported “a lot of sick people here. Many have fever or diarrhea, vomiting or measles.”

Epidemiology deals in numbers. With measles, they go like this: With 1,000 cases, about 200 children will require hospitalization, 50 will develop pneumonia, and one to three will die.

The numbers caught up to Seminole on Feb. 26.

To invoke the old Mister Rogers maxim, there are a lot of helpers to see in this story. A lot of people in Gaines County and Lubbock and elsewhere did their level best to keep people healthy, answer their questions, get them and their kids vaccinated, and just generally beat back the avalanche of disinformation and bullshit from the professional deniers and bullshit peddlers. The article starts with a focus on one of them, so be prepared going in. And look, it’s easy for us to fall into non-empathetic ditches, in part because there are so many people involved in this story who will be on the express train to hell if such a place exists, but we can’t lose our own humanity. Look again at how many helpers there are in this saga. For all the darkness, there’s also plenty of light.

This is a good sign for the short-term future.

Measles is on a downward trend in the state, and the four people in Tarrant County who were infected appear to have not infected anyone else, Dr. Brian Byrd, director for Tarrant County Public Health, said during a recent meeting.

“The message is we’re trending in the right direction, however, we need to stay vigilant,” Byrd said at the June 2 Tarrant County Mayors’ Council meeting. “There are still pockets of unvaccinated people around Tarrant County.”

Measles symptoms appear one to three weeks after a person is exposed. Byrd said the 21-day window has passed since anyone was last exposed by the four people in Tarrant County who were infected. The four were family members.

“We don’t expect any cases stemming from those four cases,” Byrd said.

I’ve been keeping an eye on the known exposures in population centers as a possible vector for the case rate to go back up. So far it seems like the response from the local health officials has been enough to prevent that from happening. Kudos to them, let’s hope they can keep it up.

And let’s remember to do our part.

The Centers for Disease Control wants everyone with international travel plans to make sure they’re fully vaccinated against measles, a change that comes as outbreaks simmer all over North America.

A recent measles outbreak in Colorado was tied to a Turkish Airlines flight that landed in Denver. Canada and Mexico are wrestling with outbreaks, too, and now the CDC has stepped up its advice to international travelers: make sure you’re fully vaccinated or don’t go.

At least 1,088 measles infections have been reported in the U.S. so far this year — most connected to local outbreaks, including one in Texas that accounts for 742 of those cases. But CDC has also gotten 62 reports of air travelers contagious with measles while flying this year.

Each unvaccinated person on a plane with an infected traveler is at high risk for contracting the airborne virus and passing it to others, so the CDC wants travelers to confirm they’ve had both doses of the measles vaccine at least two weeks before they travel.

Travelling while unvaccinated is irresponsible. Travelling while actively sick is downright malevolent. Don’t be that guy.

We will end with some good news.

The Texas health department reported no new cases of measles on Friday, the first time the state has not recorded an increase since the outbreak began in February.

The state, which is the epicenter of the current measles outbreak, has a total of 742 confirmed cases as of Friday.

The number of new cases continues to decrease, from an average of about 12 per day around the peak to fewer than one case per day recently, Chris Van Deusen, director of media relations at the Texas health department, told Reuters in an email.

“The fact that (we) haven’t had any new hospitalizations reported in more than two weeks gives us confidence there are not major numbers of unreported cases still occurring out there,” said Van Deusen.

The United States is battling one of the worst outbreaks of the highly contagious airborne infection it has seen, with over 1,000 reported cases and three confirmed deaths.

Despite the slowing spread of the infection in Texas, the country continues to record weekly increases in measles cases elsewhere.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said a total of 1,168 confirmed measles cases were reported by 34 jurisdictions as of Thursday, an increase of 80 cases since its previous update last week.

Since 2000, the only time infections surpassed the 1,000 mark was in 2019, when the country reported 1,274 cases.

There have been 17 outbreaks, defined as three or more related cases, reported in 2025, the CDC said.

There were four cases in the Tuesday report, so four for the week, and a step down from the around-ten-per-week plateau we’d been at. If this is the new normal, then so much the better.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Add Rep. Talarico to the “thinking about running for Senate” list

Join the party, there’s plenty of room.

Rep. James Talarico

State Rep. James Talarico, a former schoolteacher who often goes viral on social media for his feisty exchanges with Republicans, told Hearst Newspapers he is considering a bid for the U.S. Senate in 2026.

“The legislative session just ended, and I am having conversations about how I can best serve, and that does include the Senate race,” said Talarico, an Austin Democrat.

The seat is currently held by longtime U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, who is facing a Republican primary challenge from Attorney General Ken Paxton.

No Democrats have officially declared for the race. But former U.S. Reps. Colin Allred and Beto O’Rourke, who both unsuccessfully challenged U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, have also voiced interest in running.

Talarico, 36, joined the state Legislature in 2019 after flipping a Republican-held seat that stretches north from Austin. This session, he emerged as a forceful voice against Gov. Greg Abbott’s push for private school vouchers, frequently castigating the policy in floor debates and committee hearings as a “scam” pushed by West Texas billionaires to provide “welfare for the wealthy.”

He is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin, Harvard University and the Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary. As a pastor, Talarico frequently quotes scripture and invokes religious ideas to criticize policies like displaying the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms.

[…]

In addition to the U.S. Senate seat, governor, attorney general, lieutenant governor and the other statewide offices are on the ballot in 2026.

A U.S. Senate run would take significant capital; last year’s contest was the most expensive in the nation with more than $165 million in fundraising. Talarico’s state campaign account had $639,000 at the end of last year. Democrats said they are confident he could bring in national donors because of his ability to gain traction on social media.

Talarico’s legislative speeches are often clipped and posted on his official accounts. On TikTok he has 880,000 followers. In the last month alone, his videos have racked tens of millions of views, surpassing even national Democratic figures such as Pete Buttigieg, Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

“I’ve talked to him about running for governor all session long, but he’s told me he’s looking at Senate instead,” said state Rep. Gina Hinojosa, another Austin Democrat.

“I think that he’s good at taking the fight to Republicans,” she said. “There’s probably no more vulnerable Republican statewide candidate than Ken Paxton, and Talarico has shown that he’s very adept at challenging and taking on Republicans on their weaknesses.”

The list of people who are “thinking about” a Senate race is considerably longer than what is shown above. Like Rep. Hinojosa. I would have encouraged Rep. Talarico to consider running for Governor, but he’s going to do what he’s going to do. I believe at least one person from the “maybe Senate” list will eventually run for something else.

Dems do have a candidate for Lite Guv in State Rep. Vikki Goodwin. With the legislative session over and fundraising now open, we’re likely to hear more announcements of retirements, re-elections, and candidacies for various offices. Fundraising will of course be a big deal – as noted Talarico had $638K on hand as of January; he’ll need to step that way up, and he’s got some time to make an impression for the July report if he’s serious. (Rep. Goodwin has $150K on hand, and as she is in for Lite Guv, she will definitely need to get it going.) Talarico has been successful on social media and that will help him. The Current and Reform Austin have more.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A change in when we vote early

Very interesting.

Texas will no longer have a three-day gap between the end of early voting and Election Day under a bill passed by the Texas Legislature that is heading to Gov. Greg Abbott.

Currently, Texas ends in-person early voting on the Friday before Election Day and restarts voting on Tuesday morning at 7 a.m. for Election Day. But under the new changes, the gap is gone and Texas will essentially have one voting period that runs for 13 days.

“So this means once the voting starts — the same number of early vote days — it just doesn’t stop,” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said of the changes.

The bill by state Sen. Bob Hall, a North Texas Republican, had big support among Democrats too.

“What it means is we’ll now have two weekends of early voting instead of just the one,” said State Rep. John Bucy, a Williamson County Democrat.

Bucy said he’s always wary of changes to election laws, but in this case, voters are getting two full weekends of early voting.

It’s one of the few bipartisan election bills in recent years at the Capitol, where there’s been fierce battles over Republicans’ efforts to change voter registration rules, limit voting hours and change vote-by-mail rules all in the name of rooting out fraud.

If Abbott signs the bill into law, the change won’t go into effect until after the 2026 elections to give counties time to adjust to the new scheduling. They are expected to be in place for the next presidential election cycle in 2028.

The bill also changes how the state reports election results. No longer will state election officials report early vote results shortly after polls close on election night. Instead, those results will be included later when voting results from Election Day are also ready to be released.

The bill in question is SB2753, and the key passage is this:

SECTION 15. Sections 85.001(a) and (e), Election Code, are amended to read as follows:
(a) The period for early voting by personal appearance begins on the 12th [17th] day before election day, [and] continues through the [fourth] day before election day, and includes Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, except as otherwise provided by this section.

So if I’m interpreting this correctly, instead of early voting in person beginning three Mondays before Election Day (this is assuming a Tuesday election) and running through the Friday before, it will begin two Thursdays before and run through the Monday immediately before. If this were in effect this year, instead of early voting starting on Monday, October 20 and running through Friday, October 31, it would begin on Thursday, October 23 and run through Monday, November 3, with Election Day being on Tuesday, November 4. Still twelve days of early voting in person, just shifted forward by three days.

I think I like it. I agree with Rep. Bucy, it’s nice to have that second weekend included. There’s more to the bill than just this, and I’ll leave that to others to explore at this time. Senator Hall is, to put it mildly, not someone to trust in electoral matters, so I remain at least a little wary. But again, if my interpretation is correct, this sounds fine to me. Am I missing something? What do you think? Reform Austin has more.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas DREAM Act suddenly killed by activist judge

This is some bullshit.

Undocumented students in Texas are no longer eligible for in-state tuition after Texas agreed Wednesday with the federal government’s demand to stop the practice.

The abrupt end to Texas’ 24-year-old law came hours after the U.S. Department of Justice announced it was suing Texas over its policy of letting undocumented students qualify for lower tuition rates at public universities. Texas quickly asked the court to side with the feds and find that the law was unconstitutional and should be blocked, which U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor did.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton claimed credit for the outcome, saying in a statement Wednesday evening that “ending this discriminatory and un-American provision is a major victory for Texas,” echoing the argument made by Trump administration officials.

“Under federal law, schools cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to U.S. citizens,” U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement Wednesday. “The Justice Department will relentlessly fight to vindicate federal law and ensure that U.S. citizens are not treated like second-class citizens anywhere in the country.”

The Justice Department filed its lawsuit in the Wichita Falls division of the Northern District of Texas, where O’Connor hears all cases. O’Connor, appointed by President George W. Bush, has long been a favored judge for the Texas attorney general’s office and conservative litigants.

Texas began granting in-state tuition to undocumented students in 2001, becoming the first state to extend eligibility. A bill to end this practice advanced out of a Texas Senate committee for the first time in a decade this year but stalled before reaching the floor.

The measure, Senate Bill 1798, would have repealed the law, and also required students to cover the difference between in- and out-of-state tuition should their school determine they had been misclassified. It would have allowed universities to withhold their diploma if they don’t pay the difference within 30 days of being notified and if the diploma had not already been granted.

Republican Sen. Mayes Middleton of Galveston authored the legislation, which would have prohibited universities from using any money to provide undocumented students with scholarships, grants or financial aid. It would have also required universities to report students whom they believe had misrepresented their immigration status to the attorney general’s office and tied their funding to compliance with the law.

Responding to the filing Wednesday, Middleton wrote on social media that he welcomed the lawsuit and hoped the state would settle it with an agreement scrapping eligibility for undocumented migrants.

[…]

This issue has come before the courts before. In 2022, a district court ruled that federal law prevented the University of North Texas from offering undocumented immigrants an educational benefit that was not available to all U.S. citizens. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out that case on procedural grounds, but noted there likely were “valid preemption challenges to Texas’ scheme.” Trump administration lawyers repeatedly cited that finding throughout Wednesday’s filing.

“States like Texas have been in clear violation of federal law on this issue,” said Robert Henneke, executive director and general counsel at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, the conservative think tank that brought the 2022 lawsuit. “If anything, it’s surprising that this wasn’t brought earlier.

Don Graham, a co-founder of TheDream.US, the largest scholarship program for undocumented students, said these young people already face significant hurdles to get to college. They cannot access federal grants and loans, so legal action to rescind in-state tuition could prevent them from completing or enrolling in college altogether, he noted.

“It’ll mean that some of the brightest young students in the country, some of the most motivated, will be denied an opportunity for higher education,” Graham said. “And it’ll hurt the workforce, it’ll hurt the economy.”

Hundreds of Texas students who have been awarded a Dream.US scholarship went into nursing and education, professions that are struggling with shortages. Recent economic analysis from the American Immigration Council suggests rescinding in-state tuition for undocumented students in the state could cost Texas more than $460 million a year from lost wages and spending power.

The loss of thousands of students will also have an immediate financial impact on universities, according to available data. About 20,000 students using the law to enroll at Texas universities paid over $81 million in tuition and fees in 2021, according to a report from progressive nonprofit Every Texan. In the wake of the court’s ruling, advocates said stifling those enrollments would create cascading effects.

“This policy has been instrumental in providing access to higher education for all Texas students, regardless of immigration status, and dismantling it would not only harm these students but also undermine the economic and social fabric of our state,” said Judith Cruz, assistant director for the Houston region for EdTrust in Texas.

At least one organization, Immigrant Families and Students in the Fight, which goes by its Spanish acronym FIEL, released a statement saying it would challenge the court’s judgment. “Without in-state tuition, many students who have grown up in Texas, simply will not be able to afford three or four times the tuition other Texas students pay,” FIEL Executive Director Cesar Espinosa said. “This is not just.”

I want to note that the 2001 law passed with near-unanimous support in both chambers. It was not only uncontroversial, it was popular. Political support for such laws can certainly change over time, but it’s bizarre to me that it could have been illegal all this time. And that’s even before we get into this lightning-fast lawsuit-followed-by-immediate-settlement, which sure doesn’t seem like how the legal system usually acts. I may not be a lawyer, but Steve Vladeck is, and he calls bullshit, too.

Within a span of just over six hours, (1) the federal government sued Texas challenging a state law under which undocumented immigrants who reside in Texas are eligible for in-state tuition at Texas’s colleges and universities; (2) Texas agreed to “settle” the lawsuit by consenting to a judgment under which the state would be permanently enjoined from enforcing the law because it violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution (ostensibly because it is preempted by federal law); and (3) the consent judgment was approved by the district judge—Judge Reed O’Connor, who had a 100% chance of having this case assigned to him, since it was filed by the federal government in … the Wichita Falls Division of the Northern District of Texas.

There are at least three problems with what happened here. First, the Supreme Court has long made clear that Article III courts lack the power to adjudicate such transparently collusive lawsuits—because there is no true case or controversy when “both litigants desire precisely the same result.” Indeed, district courts are supposed to have an obligation, in such circumstances, to protect the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Not so much, here.

Second, even if there’s some way to satisfy Article III in this context, it’s Republicans who have spent much of the past decade railing against what they’ve described as “sue-and-settle,” where a federal agency defendant agrees to settle a lawsuit with a plaintiff on the (alleged) ground that the agency agrees with the plaintiff’s regulatory goals. Those cases (1) usually take longer than six hours; (2) tend to involve contexts in which the agency has a good-faith argument that it’s going to lose the lawsuit if it doesn’t settle; and (3) are typically brought by directly affected interest groups. In all three respects, this seems … worse. Indeed, part of what appears to have prompted yesterday’s activity was the fact that two bills intended to repeal the 2001 state law failed this week in the Texas Legislature. A collusive lawsuit by the United States against a state shouldn’t be a backdoor when the democratic process has already declined to intervene.

And third, of all of the courthouses in which the United States and Texas could’ve played this game, they singled-out Wichita Falls—one of the handful of “single-judge” divisions remaining in any federal district court in the country after the Judicial Conference’s March 2024 policy statement strongly discouraging the practice. Not only does that suggest a lack of confidence on the parties’ part that a randomly assigned judge would have endorsed these shenanigans, but it also drives home that, for all of the complaining by the current administration and its supporters about “judge shopping” by litigants challenging Trump policies, the only real judge shopping that’s currently going on is by the federal government.

It’s all a stain on the federal courts—one that, in this case, comes at the literal expense of as many as 20,000 Texans who have been living in the United States since they were children. Everyone involved in this sham proceeding ought to be ashamed of themselves—and, if given the chance, the Fifth Circuit shouldn’t let it stand. I’m not holding my breath.

The long list of things that the next Democratic government needs to deal with includes as a high priority killing off these judicial cheat codes for the likes of Ken Paxton and his cronies. That’s too far in the future to worry about right now. The thing to do now is appeal, however long a shot that is. I wish I had a better answer. The other thing to do is make this a part of the case against Trump on the grounds of limitless, unrelenting grift, corruption, and crime. The biggest problem there is that it’s so vast regular people have a hard time wrapping their minds around it. The best way to deal with that is to tell relatable stories about it, and boy is there no shortage of those. Daily Kos and Reform Austin have more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Whitmire’s budget passes

On to the next thing.

Mayor John Whitmire

The City Council approved Mayor John Whitmire’s nearly $7 billion budget on Wednesday after months of strenuous efforts to cut costs and streamline services as officials contended with the largest deficit in Houston’s history.

The nearly eight-hour, high-tension meeting included a protest from members of storm recovery nonprofit Northeast Action Collective that ended with the clearing of the council chambers by City Hall security officers.

Whitmire’s budget passed with a near-unanimous vote, with only Council Members Edward Pollard, Abbie Kamin and Tiffany D. Thomas voting in opposition. Pollard voted no over his worries about the city continuously spending more than it was bringing in, and Kamin voted no due to her concerns about the budget inadequately accounting for disaster response.

“Mayor, it’s not personal,” Kamin said. “I respect you. There’s a lot of hard work that has been put into this by city staff, and I hope that your administration will not seek retribution against the district and our residents.”

[…]

All 22 city departments were asked to reorganize and consolidate as they formed their respective budgets. Other efforts to save costs included implementing a hiring freeze and offering eligible employees an opportunity to retire.

More than 3,000 employees ended up retiring May 1. Houston’s Public Works Department saw the most cuts at 342 exits.

Among the largest contributors to this last year’s budget deficit was a denied Texas Supreme Court ruling that required the city to follow local law and spend hundreds of millions more on streets and drainage every year.

In an effort to stave off immediate financial impacts that would have added to the city’s deficit, Whitmire’s team negotiated an agreement with plaintiffs to phase in payments to the drainage fund over the next four years.

That settlement agreement came with pushback from advocacy groups, who argued that the city didn’t seek enough community feedback and had violated the will of the voters by negotiating a closed-door deal. The payment agreement was ultimately approved by a judge days before the budget sailed through council.

Members of Northeast Action Collective showed up to the council chambers in droves Wednesday clad in yellow shirts and held up large signs reading “YOUR BUDGET IS A SCAM” and “NO TO THE BUDGET!”

The group has been advocating against the city’s budget and say it under funds critical services like drainage and over funds public safety.

Collective members were vocal about their thoughts about the budget throughout Wednesday’s meeting, fluttering green and red sheets of paper for budget ideas they liked and didn’t like. They also held a news conference ahead of the meeting’s start outside City Hall.

Tension came to a head when City Hall security cleared the council chamber after an outburst among the group’s members as council members presented their budget amendments.

Whitmire told the council Wednesday the city has no plans to press charges against the group’s members for disrupting the meeting.

The department with the largest cut was the Department of Neighborhoods, which will be operating with around half the budget it had last year at around $7.4 million.

See here, here, here, and here for some background. Houston Public Media adds some details.

Council members offered 71 amendments to the budget. Fourteen of them were approved, including hiring additional animal enforcement officers, extra funding for kennel cleaning at the city’s animal shelter, drainage and ditch improvements, and the creation of an investment fund to address health benefits and life insurance for retired city employees.

Facing a more than $200 million deficit this year, Whitmire’s administration slashed about $75 million in spending from the city’s $3 billion general fund.

[…]

The vast majority of the proposed amendments fell short. In the most narrow defeat, council members declined to lower their own budgets by 2%. The proposal from Flickinger failed in a 12-5 vote. In the most narrow success, council member Mary Nan Huffman’s proposal to cap certain travel expenses passed in a 9-8 vote.

Huffman also authored a successful amendment to allocate more than $3 million to address drainage concerns at the local level across the 11 city council districts.

At the end of the current fiscal year, there will be about $380 million in the fund balance, according to the mayor’s finance department. The controller’s office expects about $354 million. They project a deficit for next year of $107 million to $134 million, which could leave as little as $31 million in wiggle room above the required savings threshold.

“The budget is, of course, not structurally balanced,” City Controller Chris Hollins told city council at the start of the meeting. “It contains a projected shortfall of over $100 million to be covered by spending down the city savings account to near our reserve threshold.”

“(Hollins) stated that instead of cutting spending or identifying sustainable revenue, the proposal is to draw down from the fund balance. That’s not true,” responded finance director Melissa Dubowski. She pointed to efforts to reduce bloated spending on contracts with external vendors, as well as an estimated $30 million in general fund savings after more than 1,000 municipal workers accepted early retirement buyouts in April at an upfront cost of $11 million.

“We certainly are drawing from fund balance to close the remaining budgetary gap,” Dubowski said, “but what he failed to mention is that this proposed budget actually is a decrease from the previous year.”

If the baseline financial situation continues, the finance department projects a more than $460 million budget deficit by the end of the decade — an untenable trend that would exhaust the fund balance.

I’ve not seen a city budget come close to failing, so this one’s passage is no surprise. All I know for sure is that it won’t be any easier next year. We have needed to raise revenue for a long time, and if there’s one thing to say about where we are now, it’s that we’ve done the cuts and efficiencies and consolidations. If now is not the time to alter or remove the stupid revenue cap and add a garbage fee, when will it ever be? The Press and Emily Hinds have more.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Rep. Jolanda Jones announces for CD18

Not a surprise.

Rep. Jolanda Jones

State Rep. Jolanda Jones, D-Houston, on Monday jumped into the race for the congressional seat left open by the death of U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner, the former Houston mayor.

“The simple fact is no one will fight harder to stop Republicans from taking away our social security, our public schools, our health care, our constitutional rights and more,” Jones said in a statement announcing her campaign.

“I am the only candidate in this race who has fought for our families in the Legislature, in the courtroom, on city council and on the school board,” said Jones, who was elected to the Texas House in 2022. “I helped shut down Houston’s corrupt crime lab, helped extend Medicaid coverage for new mothers and their babies and cut taxes for seniors and homeowners.”

[…]

In Congress, Jones said she would “fight to stop Trump cuts to healthcare and Medicaid, Social Security, education and veterans,” and work to expand healthcare coverage and affordability. She also emphasized bringing back the right to an abortion.

“I’ve been fighting my entire career for women’s rights, bodies, and voices, and will never stop working to restore abortion rights to make sure women — not politicians — make their own healthcare decisions,” said Jones, a criminal and family lawyer with her own practice.

The district is a Democratic stronghold, meaning the Democratic nominee is almost certain to win the election and could hold onto the seat for years.

Menefee was the first to launch his campaign, and has secured high-profile endorsements, including former U.S. Reps. Colin Allred and Beto O’Rourke, who both challenged U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz. Jackson Lee’s daughter, Erica Lee Carter, is serving as his campaign chair after briefly representing the district after her mother’s death.

Jones said she “deferred” her decision to run until the legislative session concluded this week so that she could focus on representing her constituents in the Texas House, where she served on the criminal jurisprudence, public health and redistricting committees. She was also the vice chair of the subcommittee on juvenile justice.

“I promised my constituents I would fight for them every day through the end of the legislative session — and I did exactly that,” she said.

Rep. Jones has been in the conversation for this race from the beginning. As I’ve said before, this is a free shot for State Reps like her and anyone else who might be considering it. Unlike Christian Menefee, and CM Letitia Plummer, who is still in the “thinking about it” camp, she doesn’t need to step down (unless she wins), and she doesn’t need to commit to one primary or another at this time. Waiting until the end of the session is the time-honored way to do it – not having to worry about a special session is a bonus – but it does put her behind on fundraising. She has till the end of the month to make up some ground for the Q2 report. I’ll be looking very closely at those.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tarrant county does mid-decade redistricting and gets sued over it

First there was this.

The Tarrant County Commissioners Court could get a bigger conservative majority next year under a new map passed Tuesday.

Republican Commissioners Manny Ramirez, Matt Krause and County Judge Tim O’Hare voted to adopt the map. Democratic Commissioners Alisa Simmons and Roderick Miles Jr. voted against it.

The map reshapes the two Democrat-controlled precincts and makes Precinct 2 more friendly to Republicans, according to past election data shared by the county.

This could make it harder for Simmons to be reelected to Precinct 2 in 2026.

“This appears to be a calculated attempt to strip representation from the very communities that we were elected to represent,” Simmons said at Tuesday’s meeting.

State Rep. Tony Tinderholt, R-Arlington, announced his candidacy for Precinct 2 almost immediately after the vote — the day after he announced his retirement from the Texas House.

“Throughout my career, I’ve fought to protect our values, ensure responsible government, and serve the people of Texas with integrity and commitment,” he said in a statement posted to X. “I’m running to bring that same leadership and experience to Tarrant County, and I humbly ask for your trust and your vote as we work together to strengthen our community and build a more prosperous Tarrant County.”

Simmons plans to run for reelection, she confirmed to KERA News in a text message.

The county released five potential redistricting maps at the beginning of May that were discussed at four public hearings throughout the county. On Friday, the county posted two more maps online, options six and seven. Krause moved to adopt option seven, and that’s the map that was approved.

“For the most part, I thought it maximized the partisan advantage to about as much as it could,” Krause told reporters after the meeting.

This is a long story and a long process that got us here, so read the rest and I’ll point to some other stories in a bit. Maximizing partisan advantage – or at least trying to – is a thing that redistricters do, and legally speaking they can do that. Normally this is done following the Census, but Tarrant County decided in 2021 that they didn’t need to redraw their Commissioner precincts, not even to rebalance population. Seems weird to me given that Tarrant is a growing county, but whatever. Doing it outside of the year following a Census is not the norm, but as far as I know there’s no clear law or precedent barring it. So here we are.

There are of course other possible ways in which this may be illegal, and so the next day we got this.

A group of Tarrant County residents have filed a federal lawsuit over the county’s new commissioners court precinct map, accusing the county of disenfranchising Black and Latino voters.

Commissioners voted 3-2 along party lines to adopt the new map Tuesday. It largely reshapes precincts 1 and 2, which are represented by Democrats. The court’s Republican majority has openly said the goal was to create another Republican precinct, and the new map does just that — redrawing Precinct 2 with more Republican voters.

Throughout the redistricting process, opponents have accused Republicans of racial gerrymandering. They said the new map — called Map 7 in the lawsuit — takes voters of color out of Precinct 2 and packs them into Precinct 1.

The Lone Star Project, a Democratic political action committee, shared the lawsuit in an emailed news release. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas confirmed the lawsuit had been filed.

“Map 7 surgically moves minority voters from District 2 to District 1 while just as carefully moving Anglo voters from District 1 to District 2,” the lawsuit states. “The resulting map —in a county in which the majority of residents are non-Anglo — has three Anglo-majority precincts and one majority-minority precinct.”

Republican commissioners have denied redistricting has anything to do with race. People who dislike the way maps are drawn use race as a tool to try to get them thrown out, Commissioner Matt Krause said at a public hearing in Hurst in May.

“The Supreme Court’s not gonna step in if it’s a partisan gerrymander,” he said. “That’s why you have to allege that racial component, because that’s the only way you can ever get into court to find relief, whether there’s any basis to it at all.”

The lawsuit was filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. Tarrant County, the commissioners court and County Judge Tim O’Hare are listed as defendants.

I mean, this is the turf over which Congressional and legislative redistricting have been fought in Texas for decades. SCOTUS, as we well know, has made that fight much harder to wage, much less win. That said, it is still possible to win such a suit. It’s just that it may take several years, and unless the new maps are enjoined in the meantime the redistricters will get to enjoy the spoils of their scheme, however it ends up. I strongly suspect that’s what will happen here.

In the meantime, the best case scenario for the Dems would be to win some countywide elections in Tarrant, and perhaps also the redrawn Precinct 2 seat. Tarrant had been trending blue – Beto famously carried the county in 2018, and Biden did as well in 2020 – but downballot Dems didn’t do as well those years, and the progress didn’t continue in 2022 and 2024. That said, Colin Allred carried Tarrant County in 2024, a fact I had not realized until I looked it up for this post. Trump won Tarrant by five and Tarrant’s controversial Sheriff won it by seven. In 2022, Greg Abbott won Tarrant by four points, Dan Patrick won it by two, and Tim O’Hare won it by six. Commissioner Simmons won her original precinct by three points. If 2026 is a good year, then knocking off O’Hare is in play. I don’t know enough about the new Precinct 2 to say, but it should at least be a goal.

So there you have it. There are links to earlier stories in this saga in that Fort Worth Report story, so check those out as well. It will not shock me if there’s a temporary restraining order put on the new map by a federal district court judge, which is then lifted by the Fifth Circuit. That’s a movie we’ve seen plenty of times before. I will keep an eye on it.

Posted in Legal matters, Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Why are we messing with pension reform?

I do not understand this.

Mayor John Whitmire

The Texas Legislature, with Mayor John Whitmire’s support, is on the cusp of rolling back reforms to Houston’s police and firefighter pensions, worrying experts who call the changes premature, ill-considered, even “stupid.”

The proposal comes just eight years after the Legislature passed sweeping reforms to Houston’s employee pensions, which at the time were underfunded by $8.2 billion. That enormous debt, two decades in the making, helped spur a financial crisis that led rating agencies to downgrade the city’s credit. Efforts to address the problem spanned three mayoral administrations.

House Bill 2688, which passed both chambers unanimously late last month and awaits Gov. Greg Abbott’s signature, leaves most reforms intact but reverses two key changes: It would again let police officers and firefighters retire after 20 years of service, regardless of their age. And it would make them eligible for a controversial program that lets employees retire on paper but keep working while the pension payments they would have received grow, with interest, in their individual accounts.

Past reforms closed this deferred retirement option plan, or DROP, to officers hired after 2004 and to firefighters hired after 2017. Those reforms also required workers to be older, work longer, or both, before earning full benefits.

Craig Mason, a retired actuary who worked as a pension consultant under multiple Houston mayors, was shocked to learn of this year’s legislation.

“They lowered the retirement age, which is an inducement to retire, and then they add DROP, which is an inducement to stay on. That’s stupid. It’s cross-purposes,” he said. “This is just mind-boggling to me. They’re going backwards.”

The bill’s supporters say the measure is a way to retain police and firefighters at a time when both departments’ headcounts are down. They also insist the measure is cost neutral, pointing to actuarial projections submitted by the pension funds and deemed “reasonable” by the state Pension Review Board.

“I wouldn’t have passed this legislation if it walked back the important reforms from 2017, or put taxpayers, the pension plans and the city at risk by creating new unfunded liability,” said state Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, who sponsored the bill in the Senate and also carried Houston’s 2017 pension reform bill.

Though the city did not take an official position on the measure, Whitmire, who as a state senator often carried bills the firefighters’ pension fund supported and served as a federal lobbyist for the fund in 1993, cheered the bill’s passage.

“It will assist us in recruiting and retaining firemen and policemen,” Whitmire said in an interview last week. “Our actuarial people say it’s cost-neutral. Sounds to me like a win-win.”

The mayor had hinted at the idea of reviving the DROP program for officers last fall. He also has given hefty raises to officers and firefighters since taking office last year, despite Houston’s long-running budget challenges. The deal settling a long-running pay dispute with the firefighters, in particular, worried ratings agencies.

[…]

Josh McGee, a former chairman of the state Pension Review Board who played a key role in the 2017 reforms, pushed back on this “Oh, it will pay for itself” attitude.

The DROP program was not restructured so that the money it produces for the pension funds could offset the cost of other retirement benefits, he said. It was done to ensure the program produces enough money in good years to offset its own cost in a downturn – since the city guarantees DROP accounts will earn 2.5% interest annually, regardless of market conditions.

Nor would it take a serious downturn to increase what the city owes its pension funds. The city must contribute more anytime the funds earn less than 7% over a 5-year period – that’s the core assumption on which all Houston pension math is based.

“It’s cost-neutral under this one actuarial note, but if they miss their 7% return by just a little bit it will not be cost neutral – it will have a significant, meaningful cost to the city,” McGee said. “It’s based on a risky assumption. That’s part of the practice that got pension plans into the trouble they’re in to begin with.”

John Diamond of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, who has researched public pensions, said the current DROP structure is “harder to take advantage of.”

“But there’s still a risk,” Diamond said. “And part of that risk is once they get all these people in, they’ll start expanding DROP benefits – they’ll start loosening the rules.”

Houston finance director Melissa Dubowski acknowledged the bill’s cost-neutral projections hold true only if the funds meet their 7% assumed rate of return in the market.

Still, she said HB 2688 does not increase the risk to taxpayers because the bill retained a provision of the 2017 reforms – dubbed the “corridor” – that would force the city and pension funds to negotiate benefit cuts if the city’s costs rise above a specified level.

Kelly Dowe, who served as Houston finance director during the 2017 reform push, said this view should not comfort taxpayers.

“The worry everyone had with the corridor is: What happens if you go out the top?” Dowe said. “The only remedy is the city and the pension funds must come to the table and agree. But there’s no mechanism for forcing agreement – and you’ll forgive me if I’m a little skeptical of what this administration would do if we go over the top of the corridor.”

I admit, I’m flummoxed by this. I can understand the desire to retain employees, though doing so by simultaneously allowing them to retire and also continue to work and thus enhance the value of their retirement seems like an awfully expensive benefit. And less than a decade after a multi-year, multi-session effort to reign in pension costs in the first place. It feels like we’re breaking out the ouija board and painting a new pentagram on the floor after finally getting a “no longer haunted” certificate from the exorcist. Like, what are we doing here?

Also, too, maybe we don’t need to hire a bunch more cops? Maybe we could do an efficiency study, like the one we just endured for the municipal workforce, and figure out how to better deploy our existing resources for cost savings and improved results? I know, that’s crazy talk, who could even imagine such a thing. Let’s just throw money at the problem, because nothing says “fiscal responsibility” and “we need to root out all the waste” like that. I’m sure it will all work out in the end. Reform Austin has more.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Abbott will be appointing a new Comptroller soon

Just a reminder. And that person will have a lot more influence than usual coming out of the gate.

Glenn Hegar

Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to choose a new state comptroller in the next few weeks, who will have an outsized role in the state’s rollout of private school vouchers.

The next comptroller is tasked with everything from marketing the program, which gives students around $10,500 a year to put toward private education, to running the lottery to determine who gets the funds.

Glenn Hegar is stepping down from the job this month after being named chancellor of the Texas A&M University System. Abbott can appoint his replacement, and with the legislative session wrapping up, his pick will avoid a Senate confirmation battle.

The stakes will be unusually high — for Abbott and his pick.

“Personnel is policy. Having the right people in the right place means you get the policy implemented in the way that you want,” said Brandon Rottinghaus, a political scientist at the University of Houston. “The controversy about vouchers is the potential for there to be a spiraling cost and for it to be applied in an unfair way. The governor has to put someone in place who will watch those numbers carefully.”

Abbott has yet to hint who he will choose to carry out his signature issue. The statewide position is up for election next year, and several Republicans are already campaigning for the job. They include Christi Craddick, chair of the Texas Railroad Commission, and Don Huffines, who served in the Texas Senate and ran unsuccessfully for governor in 2022.

[…]

Under the $1 billion statewide voucher program signed into law this spring, students will have access to state-funded education savings accounts they can put toward private school tuition, tutoring, books or homeschool costs.

The comptroller’s office will be provided $30 million and authorized to hire 28 new staffers to run the program.

The agency must write the applications for parents and set the deadlines, approve vendors, contract with marketing firms to promote the program around the state, collect data about participants and audit the spending to protect against fraud.

It also has to contract with up to five “educational assistance organizations” that will interact directly with parents to run the program. Those middlemen, which can be for-profit private companies, are authorized to collect up to 5% of the program funds as payment for their role — or $50 million total this biennium.

And timing is critical. The comptroller has to get the program up and running quickly, or risk creating a Catch-22 that could restrict access to families: Students need to be enrolled at a private school before they are eligible to receive funds under the program, but many won’t be able to attend the school unless they receive the funds.

With the vouchers set to take effect in the 2026-2027 school year, in order to gain admission in time, some students will need to start submitting applications to private schools as early as this fall.

See here for some background. There’s always the chance that the new Comptroller could screw this up in a variety of ways, which would be Such A Terrible Shame. There’s also a decent chance that some form of fiscal malfeasance will occur, as is always the case with more money and power than oversight and accountability. Since there will surely be a contested GOP primary for Comptroller regardless of who Abbott picks, those people will at least have some motive to keep a sharp eye on how it’s working. Root for the chaos, it’s the best opportunity we’ll have.

Posted in Election 2026, Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of June 2

The Texas Progressive Alliance is always happy to hear sine die as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Time to bury the 2025 Legislature

Good riddance.

Texas lawmakers gaveled out of their 140-day legislative session on Monday after passing a raft of conservative policies, from private school vouchers to tighter bail laws, that furthered the state’s march to the right.

The Legislature wrapped up without the same drama that defined the end of the last two sessions, when Democratic walkouts, a last-minute impeachment and unfinished priorities prompted overtime rounds of lawmaking.

This time, Gov. Greg Abbott checked off every item on his main to-do list. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the powerful hardline GOP Senate leader, accomplished the vast majority of his own priorities, working in concert with first-term House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, to send a laundry list of conservative bills to Abbott’s desk.

The GOP-controlled Legislature’s productive session left Democrats feeling dour with only scattered wins. They were able to block a handful of Republican priorities and they pushed several major bipartisan measures — from funding for public schools to water infrastructure — that made it across the finish line.

The main difference this time is that these things were accomplished without having to call a special session, where it’s easier to use time- and process-based obstacles to slow things down enough to make some other things fall off the calendar. There were, as we noted, some bad bills that died at the end of the session in that chaotic ramble, but there were plenty of bad bills that got ushered through. A number of them will draw litigation, and some of that will be successful; other lawsuits may just put it off for awhile. You know what I’m going to say next: The only way any of this changes is with a different cast of characters in charge. Indeed, that’s what the Republicans have managed to do over the past 20 or so years, with significant acceleration in recent elections. Maybe they will stretch that too far; maybe they already have. The time to work on that is now.

The article above covers a lot of the main items, but there’s a lot more, and the worst of it deserves more depth, so here’s a brief roundup on the main ways that the Lege made things worse:

Bill to give political appointees more oversight over Texas universities wins final passage
Texas will require public school classrooms to display Ten Commandments
Texas’ DEI ban on public schools heads to Gov. Greg Abbott for final sign-off
Texas will require state documents to reflect sex assigned at birth
Texas just defined man and woman. Here’s why that matters.
Bill requiring that Texas sheriffs work with federal immigration authorities heads to governor’s desk
Asian Texans for Justice Condemns Passage of SB 17 as Xenophobic Policy

That last one is about a new law that further restricts who can own property in Texas, mostly banning visa holders from countries including China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia from buying property other than a primary residence.

For more on what did pass, in all its ugliness, see:

Reform Austin
Bayou City Sludge
Lone Star Left
The Current

There’s plenty of material to work with in 2026. Get involved with a campaign or an organization and do your best.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Still on the “what will Greg Abbott do with the THC ban” question

He’s going to take his sweet time, that much is for sure.

Gov. Greg Abbott is facing intense political pressure over a bill that would ban products containing tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, as hemp industry leaders mount a full-court press urging the governor to veto the measure while Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and his allies urge Abbott to sign it into law.

The issue has sparked backlash from both sides of the aisle, including from conservatives ordinarily supportive of Patrick’s hardline agenda. An April statewide survey by the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin found that 55% of Republicans believe Texas’ marijuana and cannabis laws should be less strict or left as they are now, compared to 40% who said they should be stricter.

Less than one-third of voters of all political persuasions said the state should stiffen its THC laws. Yet, should he break out the veto pen, Abbott would likely incur the wrath of Patrick, the powerful Senate leader who made the ban one of his top priorities, calling THC-infused products — such as gummies, beverages and vapes — a “poison in our public.”

In a sign of the intense fallout since lawmakers approved the ban, Patrick called a news conference last week to renew his criticism of the hemp industry and the products they are pushing, which he said are designed to appeal to children.

[…]

Asked if he was calling the news conference over concerns about an Abbott veto, Patrick said he was “not worried about the governor.”

“I’m worried about the pressure on the media and the general public to try to keep this going in some way and bring it back,” Patrick said, adding, “I’m not going to speak for the governor. He will do what he is going to do. I have total confidence in the governor.”

Meanwhile, as the Legislature prepared to gavel out for the session on Monday, hemp industry leaders held their own news conference to call for Abbott to veto the bill — underscoring the competing pressures now facing the governor.

See here for some background. I’ll say again, Greg Abbott will do whatever Greg Abbott thinks is best for Greg Abbott. I lean towards him signing the bill (or at least, not vetoing it; he could just let it become law without his signature) because I don’t think he wants to get into a pissing contest with Patrick. I see that oft-quoted poli sci prof Cal Jillson agrees with me on that, so make of it what you will. I also don’t think Abbott fears Republican voter backlash – I think he thinks that he dictates to them, not the other way around. I say, let’s find out. The Barbed Wire has more.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Judge tells Ogg to zip it

I mean, come on.

A judge on Monday ordered former Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg to stop talking to the media about the men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray.

District Judge Josh Hill tightened a gag order issued to lawyers involved in the case to specifically muzzle Ogg, who last week appeared on Fox 26, where she revealed previously unreleased details about one of the suspects in the case. Ogg said that one of the men accused of Jocelyn’s rape and murder had previously been accused of sexual assault in Costa Rica.

Ogg did not respond to a request for comment.

Ogg’s statements roiled the criminal courthouse. A previous gag order issued by Hill prohibited lawyers from speaking about the details of anyone involved in the cases or opinions about their guilt.

Josh Reiss, general counsel for the Harris County District Attorney’s office, called Ogg’s statements “extraordinary, grossly inappropriate, [and an] abhorrent violation of the rules of professional conduct.”

The DA’s office is also filing a grievance about Ogg to the State Bar of Texas, Reiss said in court.

“We are as serious as a heart attack about this,” Reiss said.

Reiss said Ogg violated professional rules regarding confidential information and against potentially prejudicing a pending case, and engaged in conduct that “reflect adversely on the legal profession.”

Ogg became aware of the allegation about Franklin Peña while she was district attorney, according to a motion to revise the gag order filed by the DA’s office Monday morning.

Lawyers for Peña and Johan Jose Martinez Rangel, the men accused in Jocelyn’s killing, also asked Hill to hold Ogg in contempt of court and for DA Sean Teare office to appoint a special counsel to investigate Ogg.

Hill extended the gag order against Ogg specifically and said he would consider making other changes proposed by the DA’s office at a future hearing.

[…]

Hill issued his original order in September to tamp down on comments on the case being made in the media, which Peña and Martinez Rangel’s lawyers said could prejudice potential jurors in their future trials, and make it impossible for the men to get a fair trial.

The order applied to Ogg when she was the district attorney, and both prosecutors and defense attorneys said the order still applied to her since leaving office.

Ogg in the interview said she was revealing the details because she disagreed with decisions Teare’s office had been making, particularly when dropping cases. Ogg said she wanted the “public to get the final say.” Reiss called Ogg’s interview politically motivated.

“Who would have thought that the former district attorney of Harris County would just take it upon themselves to go on television and just leak confidential information because she disagreed with the current district attorney’s decision making and she believed the public had a right to know,” Reiss said.

I have said many times in this space that I Am Not A Lawyer. I say that because I will opine on various legal matters and I want to make it clear that I’m just a layman, with no training or special knowledge. That said, I am not completely ignorant on the law and related matters. It’s easy enough to look up state laws, and often a simple reading of them is clear enough. I have friends and relatives who are lawyers and judges, and I’ve talked to them about legal matters of interest. I’ve done a ton of reading – news, analysis, legal opinions, etc – in service of this blog and of my own interest. I’m very much not an expert, but I do know a few things.

And one of the things I know is that there are very often restrictions on what an insider can say in public about a criminal case, especially on the prosecution side. There are a variety of reasons for this, starting with and primarily because of the presumption of innocence. Just one loose statement about a piece of evidence that has been or could be ruled inadmissible, and you’ve got yourself a botched case at the least and possibly worse. If I know this – hell, if most people who have seen an episode or two of Law and Order know this – then surely any actual attorney knows this. And that’s before we take the previously existing gag order into consideration.

So yeah. I will not speculate on motives, or on what may happen in the event that a complaint is filed with the State Bar. We’ll see what happens next. In the meantime, silence is golden.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Two more years of Mike Miles

Worst Groundhog Day ever.

The state takeover of Houston ISD will continue for two more years before the Texas Education Agency announces the timeline for the transition back to elected board members overseeing the district.

TEA Commissioner Mike Morath said in a letter that HISD has made “tremendous” improvements in student academic performance during the first year of state intervention, as well as gains in finance, operations, special education compliance and school board governance.

However, he said the two-year extension of the state takeover through June 1, 2027, will allow HISD to build on its progress and “achieve lasting success for students” following the eventual transition to elected board oversight.

“If you think about the degree of systemic problems that existed in Houston for more than a decade, it is just proven two years is not quite enough time to see those systems completely turned around,” Morath said in an exclusive interview with the Chronicle.

Morath wrote that he would announce the timeline to transition back to elected board members on or around June 1, 2027. Once the transition back to elected oversight begins, the TEA will replace one-third of the appointed board with elected trustees every year until all nine elected trustees are seated.

State law required Morath to notify the appointed Board of Managers and elected trustees when the state takeover will end by June 1, 2025. It also allows him to extend the intervention for up to two years if he determined that “insufficient progress has been made toward improving the academic or financial performance of the district” after receiving local feedback.

[…]

State-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles’ initial contract with the Board of Managers ends Aug. 31, 2026, but he told the Chronicle last month that he plans to stay as the leader of the district throughout the takeover.

I suppose I expected this. If the results hadn’t been as good, that would be proof we need to do what we’ve been doing even harder, in the way that the justifications that used to be proffered for why we always need to spend more money on border enforcement would go: If illegal crossings go up, we need to step up our efforts and do more, while if they go down then what we’re doing is clearly working and we need to press onward. Lather, rinse, repeat. That said, now that we have touted all these gains, I’m just curious what happens if the gains level off. Would that be Mike Miles’ responsibility, or will the conclusion be that Miles has been failed by everyone around him? Have I mentioned lately that I’m happy my youngest kid is graduating this month? All the Dems in the Legislature criticize the move, and the Trib has more.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Morath replaces half the Board of Managers

For reasons.

The Texas Education Agency has removed and replaced four of the appointed members of Houston ISD’s Board of Managers two years into the state takeover.

TEA Commissioner Mike Morath wrote that he removed board Vice President Audrey Momanaee, Cassandra Auzenne Bandy, Rolando Martinez and Adam Rivon from their roles as of Sunday. The four new board members will be Edgar Colón, Martyn Goossen, Lauren Gore and Marcos Rosales.

The four departing members had served on the district’s nine-member appointed school board since the state takeover of Texas’ largest school district in June 2023. The TEA removed oversight of the district from nine elected trustees when Wheatley High School triggered a state law by failing to meet the state’s accountability standards for seven consecutive years.

“I have nothing but praise to offer to these amazing individuals, and I want to extend my sincerest appreciation for their dedicated service to Houston ISD,” Morath said in a Monday press release. “I am extremely grateful for the exemplary servant leadership displayed by these departing board members over the grueling first two years of this intervention.”

[…]

[Elected Trustee Dani] Hernandez said it’s concerning that HISD is going to be losing four board members that ask questions, bring a parent perspective and give the community more insight into what’s going on. She said they were the voice HISD community members had on the board, and now they’re gone.

“It takes a long time to figure out how to be a board member, and they’ve all already gone through the governance model, and the questions that they were asking were part of being a board member and were in line with good governance, which is part of the exit criteria for HISD and the takeover, so it’s concerning and not necessarily transparent either,” Hernandez said.

Morath said in an interview with the Chronicle that he was replacing the members for a “mix of factors.” He said the new board members would help ensure that the board has “an environment that is representative of Houstonians” and would allow HISD to build off the academic progress of the last two years.

“What continues to be important is that we select people to serve on the board of character and integrity that bring their individual life experience, perspectives (and) their views. … The new people that are coming on bring on new perspectives, and sometimes that can be advantageous to have new insights (or a) new lens on different issues,” Morath said.

[…]

The four replaced board members have nearly always joined the remaining board members to approve proposals from Miles’ administration since the beginning of the state takeover, except in a few rare, limited circumstances.

The appointed board’s first significant public rebuke of Miles occurred in June 2024, when members approved the district’s $2.1 billion budget in a narrow 5-4 vote. Rivon, Martinez and Auzenne Bandy all voted against the measure, along with Cruz Arnold, although none publicly said why they voted “no.”

In a largely symbolic 3-4 vote two weeks later, the board rejected a progress report from HISD where the district stated it had not made any significant changes to programming or school options without a research-based analysis.” Auzenne Bandy, Martinez and Rivon all voted to reject the report, as well as Garza Lindner.

HISD wrote in the report that it had made five changes to school options or programming, but they had all been done with an analysis. However, at the time, several board members appeared to dispute the district’s interpretation of whether it had conducted appropriate analysis, and they later voted to finalize stricter limits on when and how Miles could make changes.

Morath said the decision to replace the four board members was “not at all” related to any potential criticism of the superintendent or the current direction of the district. He said the change was made to ensure “that we have the best representatives from Houston that we can during the entire process.”

Well, yeah, but as the story notes the takeover law also allows Morath to hire and fire the Board of Managers, and there was no actual process followed here, just Morath going by vibes. It’s the opposite of transparency. I don’t care about any of the individuals involved – frankly, the Board is an indistinguishable mass to me – but in the absence of a clear and understandable process, we’re all left to guess what’s going on. And from where I sit, who knows what that was. The Press has more.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The THC ban and hemp farmers

Obviously bad for them.

Six years ago, Texas lawmakers opened a door to a new lifeline for farmers: growing hemp. Farmers invested time, money and land into growing the drought-resistant crop and developing the state’s budding hemp industry.

The same lawmakers are now slamming the door shut. All products containing tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, could soon be banned in Texas. As a result, farmers are bracing for impact as they wait to go out of business.

“We wouldn’t be in the hemp business in a million years if they hadn’t passed that bill,” said Ann Gauger, co-owner of Caprock Family Farms in Lubbock. “Now we’re one of the largest hemp producers in the U.S., and their ban is going to shut that down.”

The Texas hemp industry, in its current form, has effectively been handed a death sentence with the upcoming passage of Senate Bill 3, authored by Lubbock Republican Sen. Charles Perry. On Sunday, the Legislature sent the bill, which bans consumable hemp products that contain even trace amounts of THC, to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk. However, hemp can’t be produced without traces of THC, farmers say, regardless of the product.

The plant has been a target for lawmakers since the start of the legislative session, with the charge led by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. Patrick pulled out all the stops to make the ban pass, including with surprise visits to dispensaries in Austin and vows for a special session if it failed. Patrick and Perry say the hemp industry exploited a loophole in the bill that did not establish a threshold for hemp derivatives, other than delta-9 THC.

Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller has also walked back his opposition to an outright ban on THC, now aligning with Patrick’s position. He deleted a post on X where he called the THC ban a “sledgehammer” to farmers, and now Miller said the bill will not be detrimental to farmers. Miller said the hemp industry will thrive as it’s moving toward producing industrial hemp, a fiber type of hemp that does not contain THC. It could be used in construction materials, rope and more. He said they never intended to have THC available across Texas, and called it a dangerous situation.

“This just puts us back to where we started,” Miller told The Texas Tribune. “It’s going to be detrimental to a lot of businesses that have opened their business model on selling THC products. Those businesses will have to shut.”

In lawmakers’ pursuit of a ban, growers like Gauger were caught in the crosshairs. Gauger, who runs the business with her husband and two sons, felt ignored by most of the Legislaturestate leaders. Gauger says they did everything they could to get lawmakers to hear them over the last few months and testified to the House committee overseeing the bill. It did not work.

“Charles Perry says he has an open door policy. That is an absolute lie,” Gauger said. “We live in his district, and he will not see us. We’ve gone to his office in Austin, but he refuses to see us.”

Gauger said House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, and his team were the only ones to speak with the family. Kyle Bingham is another frustrated hemp grower in the South Plains that took a chance on growing the crop. Bingham, who is also president of the Texas Hemp Growers Association, called the bill overreaching and unenforceable. He also said lawmakers involved in writing the bill ignored farmers during the process. Bingham is one of Perry’s constituents.

“We were left out of this conversation,” Bingham said. “Yes, you can go to public hearings, but not having a lot of say and being stonewalled out of the initial bills was frustrating.”

[…]

Bingham said he’s now considering what to do in September when the bill is slated to go into effect. Any products he still has with THC will either have to be sold by then or he will be burning it. He’s going to focus more on cotton and wheat, even though he wanted hemp to be in their rotation of crops.

Gauger is expecting a downfall for the hemp industry across Texas. Just like growers have to consider the legal consequences, the same applies for retailers and grocery stores that sell consumable hemp products. This includes hemp hearts, hemp seed oil, and even some big brands — KIND bars have a line of granola bars that contain hemp seeds.

See here and here for the background. I’m going to say the same thing I’ve said to the consumers, retailers and now growers of these products: You should be mad at Dan Patrick, and you should take that anger out on Dan Patrick in next year’s election. He was very clear about what he intended to do, and in doing so he not only bulldozed any resistance from House Republicans, he also rolled over the likes of Sid Miller, who started out in support of hemp farmers but folded like a lawn chair when Patrick strong-armed him. (You should also be mad at Sid Miller, in case that’s not clear.) Will these folks remember to be mad next year? I don’t know. Would it help if statewide Democratic candidates, especially those running against Dan Patrick and Sid Miller talked to them, campaigned for and with them, and reminded them regularly why they should be mad? I think so. Now we just need that to happen.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

SCOTx gives Paxton another crack at Annunciation House

Ugh.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton can move forward with his efforts to gather records from El Paso’s Annunciation House to investigate his claims that the migrant shelter network was harboring undocumented immigrants, the Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday.

“We conclude that the trial court erred in its constitutional holdings. We likewise conclude that the court’s related injunctions, which prevent the attorney general from even filing a quo warranto action, were premature at best. Our primary holding is that the attorney general has the constitutional authority to file his proposed quo warranto action, which simply allows the usual litigation process to unfold,” the state’s highest civil court said in an 8-0 decision.

Quo warranto is a centuries old legal term, with roots in English common law, that requires a person or organization to show what authority they have for exercising a right or ability they hold. In this case, Paxton is challenging Annunciation House’s right to do business in Texas. The ruling noted that this is the first time in more than a century that the Texas Supreme Court ruled on a quo warranto proceeding.

Ruben Garcia, founder and executive director of Annunciation, told El Paso Matters Friday that the organization is looking at the full ruling and couldn’t comment until they have a complete understanding of all its implications.

The ruling contains some good news for Annunciation House, particularly on what constitutes the crime of harboring an undocumented immigrant.

“Annunciation House is certainly correct on one point, as the attorney general now agrees: that merely providing shelter to persons who happen to be migrants, regardless of their legal status, does not violate the alien-harboring statute,” the justices ruled.

But the court also found that the attorney general had shown “probable ground” to proceed with a quo warranto action to determine whether Annunciation House violated the state harboring statute.

El Paso Catholic Bishop Mark Seitz, who has supported Annunciation House in its battle with Paxton, in a statement to El Paso Matters said he was waiting for an interpretation of the ruling’s implications.

“Our preliminary understanding of today’s Texas Supreme Court decision is that it allows the court case to proceed in relation to the Attorney General’s investigation of Annunciation House. While this is disappointing, I have faith that justice will prevail and stand in solidarity with Annunciation House that works to faithfully uphold the Church’s mission to help the least amongst us.”

The court overturned a July 2024 ruling by 205th District Judge Francisco Dominguez of El Paso, who ruled that the “outrageous and intolerable actions” by the Attorney General’s Office were unlawful and relied on unconstitutional statutes. Paxton’s office appealed the decision directly to the Texas Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in January. 

Friday’s ruling sent the case back to Dominguez for further proceedings in line with the Supreme Court decision.

[…]

U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso, who has called Paxton’s actions politically motivated, said Annunciation House has provided humanitarian support for immigrants in coordination with Border Patrol for decades.

“It is shameful that embattled AG Ken Paxton abuses the resources and power of his office to bully those he doesn’t agree with,” Escobar said in a statement to El Paso Matters.

See here for the previous update. Rep. Escobar is absolutely right, and as a reminder Paxton has tried this same tactic against multiple other immigration-focused charities. At least one of those cases is going through the regular appeals process, so we could be getting more rulings soon. It is my hope that when this returns to Judge Dominguez’s court he throws it in the trash again. The Trib has more.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

From the “Time has no meaning” department

This is so stupid.

Texas lawmakers have disagreed for years over whether and how to abolish the unpopular semiannual clock change in the state, but a bill that is on its way to the governor will finally bring an end to that debate — if Congress also acts.

House Bill 1393 by Conroe Republican Rep. Will Metcalf would establish “Texas Time,” or permanent daylight saving time in the state, if federal lawmakers later allow states to do so.

“Right now, the federal government does not allow the states to make this change, so this is effectively a trigger bill,” said Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, who sponsored the bill in the upper chamber.

Under the federal Uniform Time Act of 1966, states may not currently adopt permanent daylight saving time, but they can opt out of time changes by sticking with standard time year-round. That’s how states like Arizona and Hawaii can keep from changing their clocks twice a year.

Texas joins 18 other states that have passed similar permanent daylight saving time measures, and there’s interest at the federal level in allowing the change.

Look, I’m a lifelong defender of the current system, but I’m not going to try to dissuade you if you hate the time changes. But if we are going to get away from that – maybe, someday, if federal law changes – can we at least agree that permanent standard time is what makes the most sense? Because right now what the Lege has done is move Texas out of Central time and into Eastern time. You do know that Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama are all in Central time, right? That means we could have a situation where you drive west from Florida and you go from Eastern time to Central time and then back again to Eastern time. Hell, if say Mississippi gets the bright idea to do what we just did, you could go Eastern-Central-Eastern-Central-Eastern, all in the space of a day’s drive.

And then there’s that small piece of Texas near and including El Paso that’s now on Mountain time. What happens to it? Does it move to Central time, or does it become like the rest of the state and join Eastern time. If the latter, then every border crossing into New Mexico is now a two-hour time change; if the former, it’s for crossings that emanate from places like Odessa and Lubbock and Abilene. And now going north into Oklahoma is also a time change. How does any of this make sense?

Like I said, maybe none of this ever happens. Or maybe, if we do insist on killing DST federally, the mandate is that we just stay in the standard time of the time zone we’re now in. That would at least be reasonable, even if I hated it. But this? This is chaos, and the reason why the world adopted standard time zones in the first place. Only in Texas, I swear to God. The Barbed Wire has more.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Rice seeks naming deal for Rice Stadium

I dunno about this.

Rice Stadium opened in 1950, once held a maximum capacity of 70,000, and has played host to a Super Bowl and presidential speech. It’s also one of the most direct and to the point names for any venue out there. But now, Rice University is looking to rename the 47,000-seat stadium, and is searching for partners.

Rice’s athletic department announced on Wednesday that it will work with Independent Sports and Entertainment to identify a potential naming rights partner for its stadium, which also hosts various concerts and other sporting events.

“We are excited to work with ISE as we seek a naming rights partner for Rice Stadium,” said Rice Vice President and Director of Athletics Tommy McClelland. “It is more important than ever that we continue to be creative and open-minded as we explore new ways to invest in our student-athletes and ensure that we are providing them with a best-in-class experience.”

Rice aims to improve its athletic performance, especially in football, as new head coach Scott Abell begins his first year. Furthermore, keeping pace with the competition is evidently important for Rice, as more schools invest in their athletic programs with resources for infrastructure, NIL funds, and personnel to strengthen their teams. With the new revenue-sharing model impacting college sports, securing naming rights appears to be a logical next step.

[…]

So, who will get naming rights for Rice Stadium? Toyota (Houston Rockets), NRG (Houston Texans), and Daikin (Houston Astros) currently adorn the venues of the city’s professional teams. Can I interest you in a Buc-ee’s Stadium for the Owls? How about H-E-B Stadium for a clash between Rice and Houston? Stadiums also do well with good nicknames, so maybe we could get Blue Bell Stadium and call it “The Bell?”

With the 2025 college football season starting in three months, fans should expect a deal to be finalized by August.

The jokes are flying among the Owl fans, too. I can live with this, as long as it’s not too janky and doesn’t involve any truly evil people or corporations (you can surely infer what I have in mind here). The one thing I am sure of is that the MOB will have something to say about it this fall. Come to the first game or two in September and see for yourself what that will be. Rice’s statement on the deal is here.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston, Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Weekend link dump for June 1

“Even Where Abortion Is Still Legal, Many Brick-and-Mortar Clinics Are Closing“.

“The options for paying tribute to the president, his kin, and the MAGA movement are now legion. There are even exciting new opportunities to protect your business by reaching a “settlement” with the leader of the free world. Or you can just hand over a 747 for him to use as Air Force One, as Qatar did. Best of all, these creative funding methods might not even be against the law—especially for Trump. (Thanks, SCOTUS!) So here’s your guide to participating in the brave new Trumpworld of executive enrichment.”

“A hacker who breached the communications service used by former Trump national security adviser Mike Waltz earlier this month intercepted messages from a broader swathe of American officials than has previously been reported, according to a Reuters review, potentially raising the stakes of a breach that has already drawn questions about data security in the Trump administration.”

Dear Tim Cook: This is why you don’t bend the knee. Learn something from the experience.

“This Is How ‘The Price Is Right’ Contestants Make It On To The Game Show”.

NPB’s Central League doesn’t have a designated hitter rule, one of the last professional holdouts against the DH. Will they eventually join their peers? (Note: Pitchers in the CL are batting .106 so far this season. So, you know, bad.)

“The tragedy of prevention goes like this: The most effective way to save lives (prevention) is the least noticeable, which leads us to undervaluing it in our individual choices, in what we celebrate, and in public policy, and that undervaluing of prevention leads to a great deal of needless death and suffering.”

“You’ve probably been busy the past three months going to work, paying bills, living your life. You probably haven’t been following every incremental development in the ongoing negotiations over the future format of the College Football Playoff beginning in 2026. So, allow me to catch you up.”

“But wastewater has run into a rather ironic conundrum: It has become valuable.”

RIP, Mara Corday, early Playboy model and actor best known for the classic 1950s creature feature Tarantula.

RIP, Peter David, novelist, comic book writer on “The Incredible Hulk” and others, screenwriter on Babylon 5 and others.

RIP, Charles Rangel, former longtime Democratic Congressman from New York.

“The point here is that everyone knows this. Everyone knows that this president abuses the powers of his office and is constantly threatening to abuse those powers further against anyone who doesn’t “eat the tariffs” or fire all the non-white professors or whatever cruel and capricious thing the misfiring synapses in his syphilitic brain come up with next.”

“New research shows that penguin guano in Antarctica is an important source of ammonia aerosol particles that help drive the formation and persistence of low clouds, which cool the climate by reflecting some incoming sunlight back to space.”

RIP, Ronnie Duggar, founding editor and longtime publisher of the Texas Observer.

“National Public Radio and three of its local stations sued President Donald Trump on Tuesday, arguing that his executive order cutting funding to the 246-station network violates their free speech and relies on an authority that he does not have.”

“It’s a pretty straightforward dynamic we’re probably all familiar with. In any social context if you make it hard to express criticism or anything but approved opinions you quickly have very little idea what people actually think. Because you’ve made it impossible for them to tell you. At the government level that’s very helpful for the people in power. But it also gives them less visibility into what people think, where public opinion actually is.”

RIP, José Griñán, longtime Houston news anchor who reported onsite at the Branch Davidian compound in 1995.

Here are the three new lead actors for the questionable HBO reboot of the Harry Potter series. I for one will not watch, but I will spectate. I hope these three kids have good support systems in place, because that’s going to be a bumpy ride.

RIP, Rick Derringer, guitarist, singer, songwriter, and producer whose hits include “Hang On Sloopy” and “Rock and Roll Hootchie Koo”.

RIP, Ed Gale, the actor who played Chucky in the “Child’s Play” movies, among many other roles.

“A breakthrough by a startup backed by two of the world’s biggest mining companies points to a different path to obtaining the metals needed for manufacturing next-generation energy and defense technologies: Microbes.”

“The Trump administration would be getting slapped down in court even if the president and his minions didn’t constantly announce their intent to violate the law. But their incessant chest thumping does make things go a lot faster.”

“But the thing about the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party being in charge is that leopards are eating people’s faces and that’s horrifying and bad. That means we have to save as many people from the leopards as we can — regardless of who they are. And tend to the wounded without condition.”

RIP, Harrison Ruffin Tyler, the last living grandson of John Tyler, the 10th President of the United States. John Tyler was born in 1790. I feel a little less old right now.

“7 of Elon Musk’s worst co-president moments as he exits White House”.

“As always, an unbreakable rule of any type of baseball analysis is, if Babe Ruth was the best at something, and now your name is ahead of his, then you’re doing something extremely right.”

RIP, Loretta Swit, two-time Emmy-winning actor best known as Major Margaret “Hot Lips” Houlihan on M*A*S*H.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

Yes, the omnibus voter suppression law suppressed voting by mail

Cause, meet effect.

Some county election officials across Texas say the number of people voting by mail has dropped since 2020, but they’re not sure why.

New research suggests that the recent overhaul of state election laws could explain some of the drop.

A study from the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School looked at Texas voters whose mail ballots or applications to vote by mail were rejected in the 2022 primary, after the state enacted new identification requirements for mail ballots, among other changes. Many of those voters, the study found, appear to have switched to other voting methods or, in some cases, stopped voting.

The study found that 30,000 voters in that primary — or 1 out of 7 voters who started the process to vote by mail — had either their application or ballot rejected, and that “roughly 90% of these individuals did not find another way to participate in the 2022 primary.”

The authors said their findings show the potentially lasting effects of restrictive voting policies on even the most engaged voters.

About 85% of voters whose applications or ballots were rejected had voted in general elections in 2016, 2018, and 2020, said co-author Kevin Morris, a senior research fellow and voting policy scholar with the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program.

“This is a group of people that are super highly engaged in the political process,” Morris told Votebeat. “They have a long history and habit of voting, so to see these effects among them is a big deal.”

The peer-reviewed study, co-authored with political scientists from Barnard College and Tennessee State University, is set to be published later this year in the Journal of Politics and was shared with Votebeat.

[…]

In 2021, state lawmakers tightened the restrictions as part of an election law overhaul called Senate Bill 1. The legislation required voters to write their driver’s license or personal identification number, or the last four digits of their Social Security number, on the mail ballot application or mail ballot envelope — whichever number they originally used to register. If the ID number was missing or didn’t match the number on file, the application or ballot could be rejected.

The March 2022 primary, the first statewide election after the legislation took effect, saw a dramatic increase in rejection rates: 12,000 absentee ballot applications and more than 24,000 mail ballots were rejected, amounting to a 12% rejection rate statewide, far higher than in previous years. In the 2020 presidential election, by comparison, the rejection rate was 1%.

Mail-voting applications and ballots of Asian, Latino, and Black Texans were rejected at much higher rates than those of white voters after the ID requirement was added, according to an earlier study by the Brennan Center.

For the more recent study, researchers obtained individual-level data on mail-voting ballot applications and mail ballots in the 2022 Texas primary from litigation documents and public-records requests to the Texas Secretary of State. They looked at the demographics and the voting history of the roughly 215,000 Texans who requested a mail ballot for that primary, and drilled down to the 30,000 voters who had either their application or ballot rejected.

More than 3,000 voters whose mail-voting applications were rejected voted in person instead in the 2022 primary.

Out of the more than 18,000 voters whose mail ballots were rejected, only 344 voted in person. The others did not ultimately vote in the primary.

The study said the rejections increased what it called the “cost of voting,” because voters had to “try to sort out why their mail ballot did not arrive, re-apply for an absentee ballot, and seek out details about where to vote in-person.”

“I can’t speak to any law other than SB 1,” Morris said, “but this does provide some evidence that the effect of being disenfranchised does make people even less likely to vote into the future.”

All of this sounds very familiar, and I’m glad someone did the work of pulling together the voter data and digging in to see what happened. This was always something that could be done, it just needed someone with the time and the resources to do it. The March 2022 primary was the low point, as most people were experiencing the new law for the first time and county election offices were seeing the effect. Since then, campaigns and parties and election offices have done a lot of outreach and education, and election offices have made design changes in the packages they send to voters to clarify what information is needed and where it goes, all of which have drastically reduced the rejection rate. But mail ballots being cast are still down, in part due to the poison Trump and Republicans have injected about them and in part because some people don’t like or trust using them any more. At every step of the way, over at least the past two decades, Republicans have worked to make it harder to vote. Voters and campaigns have adjusted again and again, but the cumulative effect keeps increasing. You know the drill – nothing will change until we change who we elect.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yes, the omnibus voter suppression law suppressed voting by mail