Off the Kuff Rotating Header Image

The Dynamo Stadium rebate plan

Well, this is interesting.

The city is poised to strike a 30-year deal giving back $3 million in projected sales tax to the Houston Dynamo as they prepare to construct their $60 million stadium.

City officials say the tax rebate always has been a part of the deal that kept the team from leaving Houston, one that will make the city and county owners of a new sports stadium for which they did not have to pay.

The rebate will amount to $3 million over 30 years, said Houston Chief Development Officer Andy Icken, a primary negotiator for the city on the deal.

“This was viewed as a trade-off to get this much public infusion for a stadium that, in the end, is getting donated to us,” Icken said. “We were never going to go into this unless there was a substantial private investment in the project.”

Icken said the deal mirrors sales tax rebates the city gave the Houston Texans when it negotiated over the future Reliant Stadium.

[…]

Icken denied that the rebate is a new element of the deal, pointing to a December memo he sent City Council members in which he said council would be asked to vote “to reimburse the team for a portion of sales and liquor taxes collected by the operations of the stadium.”

Councilman Mike Sullivan, who voted for the main elements of the deal struck last year between the city and Harris County, said he did not recall any discussion of such a rebate. “I think this evolved as negotiations have taken place with the city and the county, and we’re really just now seeing the changes,” he said.

First I’ve heard of it, too. It’s not really clear to me what this is about. It’s still the case that the Dynamo are spending the vast majority of the money to build the stadium, and it’s still the case that the deal is a good one overall, but the timing on this is lousy. The only thing I can say in its favor is that at least it came out before tomorrow’s Council vote.

Related Posts:

3 Comments

  1. Al Clarke says:

    Once again it appears that someone failed to share the facts before the fact. The Dynamo stadium now has a city price tag when initially I recall there being no cost for government to get the stadium built. This at least is seeing the light of day before City Council votes on the matter, but it sounds a lot like the drainage fee proposition. “Well the drainage fee assessment will cost the average homeowner no more than $5.00 a month” but that was before anyone took a pencil to the proposition and started factoring in exceptions to those entities that think they should be exempt. I would greatly appreciate greater transparency – that is the new buzz word in government today – when these deals and propositions are proposed. Let all taxpayers known what the real costs to them are or will be – monthly fees, tax rebates, and such – well before a vote. Less than a day or two notice on a $3 million tax rebate seems unreasonable, especially if this was a part of the deal from the beginning as now being stated. Something does not sound quite correct. It is my hope that City Council tables the issue and they look into what was negotiated and when before considering how to proceed on the Dynamo stadium issue. This may still be a good deal but more needs to be known about the deal and the actual costs since there are indeed costs that were unknown, unexplained or lacking in detail initially.

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by offthekuff and Kendra, Rebate Discounts. Rebate Discounts said: The Dynamo Stadium rebate plan – Off the Kuff http://bit.ly/eOwv94 […]

  3. […] the rebate deal didn’t cause any particular heartburn on Council, so either they had some idea it was coming […]

Bookmark and Share