Off the Kuff Rotating Header Image

UTSA football

The University of Texas-San Antonio will be getting itself a football team.

The University of Texas System Board of Regents today approved UTSA’s plan to add a football program.

The plan calls for UTSA to develop an $84 million athletic complex, to add a Football Championship Subdivision football program and to advance all sports teams to a Football Bowl Subdivision conference.

Under the plan, UTSA could hire a football coach or a program administrator by February.

UTSA would sign its first class of recruits in 2010, would sign another class in 2011 and then would kick off as an FCS team at the Alamodome in the fall of that year.

The school will need to raise $15 million in a capital campaign for the football program.

Another $62 million is needed to complete the athletic complex.

[…]

UTSA will fund the initiative through student fees, corporate and private support and other revenue streams that do not draw from the institutional academic budget.

In September 2007, UTSA students overwhelmingly supported a referendum to expand the athletics program and double the athletic fee over the next five to seven years.

I realize that college football is a hugely expensive undertaking, and that most schools spend millions more per year than they take in, but I think UTSA might be in a position to do a lot better than that, for one simple reason: They’ll have almost no competition in the area for bigtime sports. The only major league team is the NBA’s Spurs, and all of the other colleges in San Antonio are NAIA or Division III. Other than Austin and UT, the same is largely true in a fairly wide area around San Antonio, especially to the south and west. UTSA has a decent-sized alumni base, which is mostly local – the story says that “80 percent of the university’s 76,000 alumni continue to live in the immediate area” – and the marketing opportunities for a Roadrunners football team ought to be pretty lucrative, if they approach it aggressively and creatively enough. Keep an eye on this, they could come out of nowhere and be a consistent bowl attendee in a decade’s time or so, like the University of South Florida.

Currently, UTSA sports teams play in the Southland Conference. The Southland is affiliated with the FCS, formerly Division I-AA.

Eventually, after several years, UTSA hopes to join a conference in the FBS, formerly Division I-A.

The Big 12, with Texas and Texas A&M, plays in the FBS. But UTSA isn’t in talking about taking its teams to that level. Instead, Conference USA, the Sun Belt and the Western Athletic Conference are being mentioned as potential destinations.

C-USA is probably the best geographic fit, but let’s not put the cart before the horse. Ask me again about this in 2015 or so. Thanks to Stace for the tip.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

3 Comments

  1. RBearSAT says:

    Charles I agree that this will be interesting to watch unfold and that UTSA has a good chance making this work. There’s a lot of community support for this and it will finally put a team in the Alamodome long term. Here’s a letter to the editor of the Express-News today regarding the potential impact to Texas A&M. As if this is the only thing the Aggies have to worry about regarding football:

    As a former UTSA employee and an Aggie, I have mixed feelings about football coming to UTSA. With recent football disasters in Aggieland being largely the result of their inability to recruit top tier athletes, I predict that UTSA’s entry into major college football will only cause Aggie football recruiting problems to intensify in the future. It is likely that within 10 years, many top tier athletes, given the choice between spending four or five years in College Station or four or five years in San Antonio, will find that to be a no-brainer.

  2. Kent from Waco says:

    Agreed:

    Of all the non-football universities in the state, UTSA makes the most sense for football. Huge potential fan base with no competition. Stadium waiting to be used.

    Florida has already shown how schools can come from nowhere to football respectability with South Florida, Central Florida, and Florida Atlantic. And the fact that Oklahoma and Oklahoma St continue to have great teams shows how much surplus football talent we have in this state. Because those teams aren’t doing it with home-grown talent.

    As for the effects on A&M. I’m doubtful. Top recruits go to the schools that are most likely to launch them into the pros. Right now that means UT and OU. Oklahoma has no problem recruiting top talent to Norman which makes College Station look like a happening place.

    I’d love to see a UTSA football team. CUSA does make the most sense with the natural rivalries being Houston, Rice, SMU and UTEP

  3. Check out the student run, utsafootball.org for recruitment and schedule updates. GO RUNNERS!!!!