There are other words I could have used as well.
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller is ordering his employees to dress “in a manner consistent with their biological gender,” the latest move by the state’s Republican leaders against transgender people.
Miller issued the requirement as part of a “dress code and grooming policy” that is dated April 13. The Texas Tribune obtained a copy of the policy, which was first reported Monday by The Texas Observer.
The two-page policy applies to all employees for the agency that Miller leads, the Texas Department of Agriculture, as well as interns and contract employees. If anyone violates the policy, they will be asked to go home and change. If problems persist, the memo says, employees can face “remedies up to and including termination.”
Brian Klosterboer, an attorney with the ACLU of Texas, said this dress code provision violates Title VII — which bans employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity — as well as the First Amendment’s right to free expression and the Equal Protection Clause.
“State agencies should be focused on doing their jobs and not discriminating against their own employees and trying to make political statements through their agency regulations,” he said. “There is no important governmental interest that this can meet.”
[…]
Ricardo Martinez, CEO of LGBTQ advocacy group Equality Texas, said the vague language is trying to enforce gender stereotypes.
“Are women no longer allowed to wear suits? Can men wear necklaces?” Martinez said. “While this policy was clearly designed to target transgender employees, it will have a negative impact on everyone. Any policy that is designed to target a specific group degrades the whole department. Texans deserve better.”
The policy is obviously discriminatory towards trans, non-binary, and gender non-conforming people, as well as being oblivious to the fact that intersex people exist. It’s also insulting to cisgender people. The language in the policy, which you can see at the end of that Observer story, is embarrassingly condescending. Even without the bizarre focus on people’s genitals, it’s never a good look to not treat adults like adults. While Sid does graciously allow the ladies to wear pants, any time you’re talking about skirt length and cleavage amounts, you’re getting into some fraught – and very, very sexist, because we all know the enforcement of this is going to fall most heavily on the women – territory. If there isn’t a lawsuit filed within a week, I’ll be surprised. The Current has more.