This just sounds ugly.
U.S. Rep. Al Green asked a federal judge Friday to find that he never discriminated against an ex-employee he claims is trying to shake him down for $1.8 million.
The employee’s lawyer countered that Green forced the woman to have sex and filed the lawsuit because he doesn’t want to pay for his misdeeds.
Although Green and the former employee had a “romantic encounter” at her home in May 2007, Bill Miller, a spokesman for the congressman, said the claim of sexual assault, coming 18 months after the fact, is desperate and totally false.
Green’s lawsuit alleges that Lucinda Daniels, the former director of Green’s Houston office, has threatened to sue him for workplace discrimination if he doesn’t pay up. Green says the woman voluntarily resigned three months ago. Green also alleges the woman is a drug user who accidentally taped a conversation onto his voicemail while buying cocaine.
“He was being extorted. A deadline was given of today,” said Ben Hall, attorney for Green, a Democrat elected to Congress in 2004. “It’s a pure shakedown. If she has a case, the place to do it is at the courthouse.”
Lawyer Chip Lewis, who represents Daniels, said she had been hoping to spare herself the embarrassment of going public and going to the police about the May 2007 incident. But Lewis said she will now make a sexual assault complaint and file a civil lawsuit against Green.
Lewis said it was Green’s lawyer, Hall, who asked to negotiate a settlement. But Hall denies that and, through political consultant Miller, says he can prove it was Daniels who approached Green for money.
Obviously, I have no idea who’s telling the truth, or more of the truth, here. I don’t envy the judge or judges who’ll be tasked with sorting it all out. Either Rep. Green is vigorously defending himself against a scurrilous accusation, or he’s about to make an already bad situation for himself a lot worse, in the fashion of Roger Clemens against Brian McNamee. If there’s sufficient merit to the sexual assault charge to bring an indictment against him, he should give serious thought to resigning. I hope that’s not the case.
I really have a hard time understanding how a woman, who the Houston chronicle reported is a lawyer by the way, could be forced into having sex. Arn’t lawyers supposed to be really smart? It could be just me, but to then ask her employer for like 2 million dollars 18 months later to keep quiet about the ordeal strikes me as a little less then genuine. I might even say it starting to sound a little contrived on her part…