As the SEC welcomed Texas A&M as its 13th member, commissioner Mike Slive says they have no immediate plans to invite a 14th.
Slive said the SEC wasn’t looking to expand, but that A&M was too attractive of an option to ignore.
“We were very happy at 12,” Slive said. “When Texas A&M came to us and indicated their interest in joining the SEC, we said to ourselves: ‘That is a great institution, academically, athletically, culturally and in every way, and a real fit.’ So we decided even though we were content with 12, that we had the opportunity to have Texas A&M as part of the SEC was something that we just did not want to give up.”
Slive acknowledged that scheduling a 13-team league will be difficult but said it wouldn’t expand just to make things easier.
They won’t expand for 2012, but I cannot believe they won’t expand shortly thereafter to balance the conference. Thirteen is just an unwieldy number to deal with, and while making the scheduler’s life easier may not be a top priority, I’m sure it’s on the to do list. I also figure that the schools that will be in a seven team division will be thinking that their mates in the six team division have it easier than they do, and will want to rectify that. If they don’t add a 14th team by the start of the 2013 season, I’ll be surprised.
Meanwhile, there’s angst about the future of the UT-A&M game.
College football needs Texas-Texas A&M just like it needs rivalries like Ohio State-Michigan and Auburn-Alabama and Texas-OU and Lane Kiffin-NCAA. They’re as much a part of the fabric of college sporting life as Beano Cook, the Rose Bowl parade and Lee Corso’s costumes. Take ‘em away, and college football isn’t nearly as compelling.
And a lot of people are sad now that A&M’s gone to the SEC, and Texas-A&M is probably dead.
But John Sharp’s beyond sad. He’s borderline mad. Or he at least halfway sounded like it. Good for him.
“We want to make it abundantly clear we will play the game anywhere, any time,” the new Texas A&M chancellor told me Monday morning. “If that game dies, it will not be on us. That game is bigger than Texas and bigger than A&M. That game belongs to the people of Texas, and if it goes away, it’s not going to be on our watch.”
The Aggies are on record as saying they want to continue the series, come rain, shine or the Longhorn Network. A&M’s president and chancellor both say they want to play Texas every year.
[…]
Both sides are talking about how difficult it will be to fit in that game with conference schedules and all. Poppycock. Isn’t A&M in the third year of a 10-year series with Arkansas? Well, that will become an SEC game, which opens up a spot for Texas. Weren’t the Aggies and Longhorns supposed to play every year until the end of time or Joe Paterno’s next birthday? So now it’s a non-conference gig like all those pre-Big 12 Texas-OU shootouts in Dallas, no problem.
You see how easy it is.
Do not let pride and ego and raw emotion get in the way of the best thing in sports since the State Fair corny dog.
But DeLoss Dodds doesn’t sound as if he’ll budge either.
“As we have said before, scheduling them would be problematic,” the Texas athletic director said. “We have contracts for three non-conference games each year that run until 2018. We also don’t know what the configuration of the Big 12 will be.”
Then, DeLoss adds this for a zinger:
“We didn’t leave the conference. They did,” he said. “We’ll make a decision that’s best for Texas.”
The irony is that while A&M bolted for the SEC in large part to escape UT’s shadow, keeping this game probably means more to them at this point than it does to UT. The Longhorns still have a signature rivalry game with Oklahoma every year. They also now have an incentive, as do other schools in Texas, to minimize A&M’s presence within the state. I’m neither an Aggie nor a Longhorn, so the loss of this game would have no special meaning to me, but I do think that having severed conference ties with Texas, A&M is in no position to blame them for the end of this tradition if that happens. (For that matter, if either school actually cared about tradition, the Southwest Conference would still be a going concern.) The Aggies shouldn’t be surprised or offended that as they have moved on, so has UT.
Well, assuming the Legislature lets them move on, of course.
Texas has a long-standing tradition of creating odd laws to fit nearly every circumstance. Hell, we have an official song for our state flower. But one has to wonder if State Senator Tommy Williams (R-The Woodlands) may be taking things a bit too far with his proposal to draft legislation that would require the University of Texas and Texas A&M University to play an annual football game every Thanksgiving as they have for many years.
With A&M moving to the Southeastern Conference and the future of the Big 12 very much in doubt, Williams and State Rep. John Otto, who will sponsor the bill in the House, have decided this is a tradition that must be preserved and the best way to go about doing that is making it law.
We’re a long way out from the next legislative session, and for all we know neither Williams nor Otto may be in the next Lege, so to say this is all a bit premature is to understate. I’m not surprised someone has taken this up, but neither will I be surprised if it winds up going nowhere.
And finally, just because it’s such a weird story, we have the possibility of a merger between Conference USA and the Mountain West Conference.
A football-only federation – involving 22 to 24 schools – would offer C-USA and Mountain West a “strength in numbers” response to recent conference realignment.
“It’s an intriguing concept,” Rice athletic director Rick Greenspan said. “It’s one that is probably a bit unique in college athletics.”
A C-USA-Mountain West merger would involve the two leagues remaining separate. At the end of the season, the two champions would meet in a championship game with the hope the winner receives a BCS bid.
No timetable has been set for when a decision could be made. C-USA commissioner Britton Banowsky told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser on Monday that the possibility of a merger for 2012 is premature but “the following year is something that is possible.” The current BCS contract runs through January 2014.
I guess the idea is that the winner of this mega-conference championship game would be seen as BCS-worthy? Or maybe that they figure either the Big XII or the Big East will implode between now and then, and they would like to be first in line to fill that slot? Seems to me there’s a bit of an underpants gnomes problem here, but maybe they’ve put more thought into this than I’m giving them credit for. All things considered, it’s not the craziest thing I’ve heard this week.
Simple solution on the TX A&M – Texas football game for future years…..forget about it. That tradition is a casualty and is the cost of greed. TX is greedy due to their Longhorn Network and the near collapse of the Big 12 they fostered and TX A&M for their departure from the Big 12 despite their word to stay and work things out.
At least Nebraska and Colorado were upfront about their departure and provided some advance notice, and neither promised to stay and then bolt. Whatever happened to honoring your word……….”my word is my bond”. Hope no one suggests Aggies are an honorable clan because such has once again been demonstrated as false.
College football has demonstrated a period of greed that should be offensive to fans of the game. Sadly this realignment will continue and mega-leagues or super conferences will continue to evolve so the wealth can be shared between the few that already dominant the dollars in college football.
Good riddance TX A&M…………….Vanderbilt welcomes the Aggies and has hopes of not being the bottom feeder in the SEC now.
Aggies, Welcome to the SEC. Arkansas 42 Texas A&M 38. October 1, 2011.
Sounds like AM is worried about losing $$$ from the Texas-AM rivalry game more than anything.
AM will be the Iowa State of the SEC. Or maybe we should call AM “The Vanderbilt of Texas”.
Isn’t AM is 0-8 vs SEC teams since 1996? Boy, the allure of the SEC is going to wear off pretty quickly.