I figure this Sunday we’ll see a bunch of Presidential endorsements, as it’s the day before early voting begins here. I don’t have any faith that Barack Obama will claim even one major paper recommendation in Texas, though I’m sure it’ll be amusing to see what justifications they come up with for touting John McCain and the ugly, repellent campaign he’s run, but that’s not my problem. While we wait for that, let’s take a look at what they should be writing, courtesy of the Washington Post.
Mr. Obama is a man of supple intelligence, with a nuanced grasp of complex issues and evident skill at conciliation and consensus-building. At home, we believe, he would respond to the economic crisis with a healthy respect for markets tempered by justified dismay over rising inequality and an understanding of the need for focused regulation. Abroad, the best evidence suggests that he would seek to maintain U.S. leadership and engagement, continue the fight against terrorists, and wage vigorous diplomacy on behalf of U.S. values and interests. Mr. Obama has the potential to become a great president. Given the enormous problems he would confront from his first day in office, and the damage wrought over the past eight years, we would settle for very good.
And here’s the Chicago Tribune:
On Nov. 4 we’re going to elect a president to lead us through a perilous time and restore in us a common sense of national purpose.
The strongest candidate to do that is Sen. Barack Obama. The Tribune is proud to endorse him today for president of the United States.
[…]
This endorsement makes some history for the Chicago Tribune. This is the first time the newspaper has endorsed the Democratic Party’s nominee for president.
Yes, you read that right – this is the first time they’ve endorsed the Democratic nominee. Surely that means that a Texas paper or two can follow suit, right? Well, here’s the Lufkin Daily News:
Today through Sunday, we’re making our endorsements for the 2008 election. Our endorsements are not partisan — we supported George Bush in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004. Our choices reflect whose policies and strengths we think, after careful consideration, will mean a better, stronger economy and way of life for Angelina County, Texas and the United States.
To that end, the choice for this year’s president is clear: Barack Obama, senator from Illinois.
His strength has been to appeal to a broad range of people, including the vital youth who are tomorrow’s leaders. After watching an inflexible president go overboard in a $700 billion bailout on loyalty for his nominee, Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, we think it’s time for a changing of the guard.
[…]
It’s the working class that are the backbone of this country, and we need someone to help us share the wealth while still encouraging a free market economy. We believe Obama has shown more interest in helping the middle class, and has proposed plans to make that happen.
Another consideration is that we should elect a president whose vice president would be ready to lead if, heaven forbid, the president were to die in office. We think Joe Biden’s experience overwhelms Sarah Palin’s limited appeal as a candidate who would instill confidence during a national crisis.
But just as a reminder that we’re still in Texas, here’s a reality check from the Amarillo Globe-News:
Barack Obama mirrors the tax-and-spend philosophies of liberal Democrats, which is not the type of change the nation needs.
John McCain has built a more conservative track record during his service in both the House and the Senate, with just the right mix of moderation, to lead the country in a positive direction.
It must be tough to hold onto the cherished old ideals these days. Who knows how much effort it must have taken to look past the outgoing two-term Republican President, who had a Republican House and Senate for much of his tenure, and the looming trillion dollar deficit he’s bequeathing us, while still believing that Democrats are fiscally irresponsible? You just have to admire their tenacity in keeping the faith.
Both links come via Evan Smith, who has managed to convince himself that the big five in Texas will all endorse Obama. Evan, I love you, man, but that’s just crazy talk. I’ll pay for all your purchases at Starbucks for a week if that prediction pans out. Hell, I’ll pay for Eileen’s, too. Not gonna happen.
Meanwhile, I forgot to note yesterday that the Chron made the easy calls of endorsing incumbent State Reps. Patricia Harless in HD126 and Senfronia Thompson in HD141. Both were expected, though in Harless’ case you have to wonder what changed, besides Chad Khan’s disappearing act as a candidate, since 2006. At least they accurately portrayed her record and positions, unlike some other Reps I could mention.
UPDATE: Sorry, Eileen. Didn’t even get a chance to work up a little suspense. Maybe next time.