Though the data isn’t yet posted on individual members’ webpages, I have gotten a copy of the 2012 election results by State Rep district, for which there was much rejoicing. The first question of interest is how much the 2008 results resembled the 2012 results in each district. I went by vote percentages as reported – that is, including third-party candidates – and compared Mitt Romney’s 2012 percentage in each district to John McCain’s 2008 percentage, and Obama 2012 to Obama 2008. I did this by taking the ratio of the 2012 percentage to the 2008 percentage. Statewide, Romney was three percent better than McCain – i.e., the ratio of Romney’s percentage (57.16) to McCain’s (55.45) is 1.03 – and 2012 Obama (41.38) was five percent worse than 2008 Obama (43.68), for a ratio of 0.95. If the difference were uniformly distributed around the state, you would expect Romney to have a 1.03 ratio in every district, and 2012 Obama to have a 0.95 ratio. Obviously, that didn’t happen, so I was interested in the places where each candidate did the best compared to 2008. Here’s a look at them:
Dist McCain Obama Romney Obama R ratio D ratio
====================================================
108 53.86 44.88 58.97 39.30 1.09 0.88
047 53.85 44.75 58.03 39.31 1.08 0.88
055 60.67 38.13 65.29 32.99 1.08 0.87
134 52.46 46.48 56.37 41.72 1.07 0.90
017 56.54 41.93 60.56 37.15 1.07 0.89
045 51.66 46.72 55.17 41.82 1.07 0.90
136 51.81 45.92 55.06 41.22 1.06 0.90
023 51.35 47.77 54.56 44.24 1.06 0.93
064 56.98 41.84 60.28 37.32 1.06 0.89
114 52.36 46.57 55.21 43.47 1.05 0.93
048 37.53 60.77 39.55 56.84 1.05 0.94
052 51.93 46.18 54.69 42.40 1.05 0.92
012 59.77 39.38 62.59 36.18 1.05 0.92
093 57.57 41.60 60.19 38.25 1.05 0.92
There were a number of other districts in which Romney ran at least five percent better than McCain – remember, that’s 5%, not five percentage points – but I’m really only interested in the reasonably competitive ones. Rep. Craig Eiland is the only member of the House to win a district that was not carried by his party’s Presidential candidate; I’m pretty sure Sen. Wendy Davis can say the same thing for her chamber, but I don’t have those numbers just yet. The only other Democratic district represented above is Rep. Donna Howard’s HD48, though it wasn’t enough of a difference to be worrisome to her. That chart has a lot of good news for the Republicans, since it contains a number of their least-safe seats. Many of these seats will still be hotly contested in 2014 – where else are Democrats going to go to add to their delegation? – but the GOP starts out with a bigger cushion than they might have expected.
And here are the districts of interest that were more Democratic in 2012:
Dist McCain Obama Romney Obama R ratio D ratio
====================================================
145 41.99 57.13 38.27 60.25 0.91 1.05
144 51.04 47.95 47.86 50.76 0.94 1.06
034 46.63 52.58 44.23 54.62 0.95 1.04
149 43.84 55.52 41.79 57.08 0.95 1.03
119 40.30 58.59 38.51 60.15 0.96 1.03
125 40.69 58.14 39.51 58.99 0.97 1.03
135 60.56 38.71 58.82 39.85 0.97 1.03
132 59.68 39.59 58.90 39.75 0.99 1.00
118 43.86 55.10 43.33 55.22 0.99 1.00
105 52.69 46.14 52.11 46.46 0.99 1.01
113 53.00 46.05 52.51 46.30 0.99 1.01
107 52.25 46.71 51.81 46.87 0.99 1.00
Again, I excluded the non-competitive seats. As above, mostly good news for Dems and their least-safe members, Eiland excluded. In two HDs where Democratic challengers ousted Republican incumbents (HDs 34 and 117), plus the open HD144, Dems had an easier time of it than you would have thought. There’s also some hope for pickups in 2014 or beyond, mostly with the three Dallas County seats.
Looking ahead to 2014, here are your “swing” districts, for some value of the term “swing”.
Dist McCain Obama Romney Obama Hecht Petty
=====================================================
017 56.54 41.93 60.56 37.15 53.13 40.61
064 56.98 41.84 60.28 37.32 57.23 36.38
094 59.62 39.45 60.27 38.09 57.45 37.73
093 57.57 41.60 60.19 38.25 57.17 37.98
097 57.62 41.41 59.55 38.91 57.30 38.25
138 59.30 39.82 59.16 39.29 57.48 39.00
108 53.86 44.88 58.97 39.30 58.66 36.49
132 59.68 39.59 58.90 39.75 57.32 39.41
135 60.56 38.71 58.82 39.85 57.09 39.77
096 57.97 41.39 58.58 40.20 55.68 40.73
047 53.85 44.75 58.03 39.31 55.30 37.87
065 56.11 43.04 57.51 40.83 55.62 39.89
032 56.40 42.57 56.91 41.43 52.98 42.12
134 52.46 46.48 56.37 41.72 56.41 39.30
115 54.91 43.86 55.37 43.08 53.74 41.67
114 52.36 46.57 55.21 43.47 54.98 41.33
045 51.66 46.72 55.17 41.82 51.11 41.39
136 51.81 45.92 55.06 41.22 51.07 40.33
112 54.89 44.03 55.01 43.48 53.01 42.79
052 51.93 46.18 54.69 42.40 50.70 42.05
023 51.35 47.77 54.56 44.24 49.41 46.77
102 52.18 46.64 53.01 45.31 52.01 43.53
054 51.20 47.93 52.90 45.73 49.92 45.71
113 53.00 46.05 52.51 46.30 50.34 46.10
105 52.69 46.14 52.11 46.46 49.18 46.28
043 51.45 47.94 52.05 46.92 46.72 49.10
107 52.25 46.71 51.81 46.87 49.73 46.29
144 51.04 47.95 47.86 50.76 44.08 52.33
117 46.49 52.52 46.71 51.84 43.46 52.79
034 46.63 52.58 44.23 54.62 40.11 56.07
078 43.64 55.31 44.05 54.29 40.84 53.47
118 43.86 55.10 43.33 55.22 38.76 57.79
041 42.16 57.05 42.28 56.54 38.86 57.22
149 43.84 55.52 41.79 57.08 40.46 56.95
074 41.15 57.91 41.51 56.93 36.18 57.25
148 41.43 57.49 41.07 56.58 38.79 55.59
048 37.53 60.77 39.55 56.84 37.43 54.95
125 40.69 58.14 39.51 58.99 36.03 60.35
050 38.01 60.27 38.78 57.75 36.33 56.25
Again, note that no one but Eiland won in a hostile district. Turncoat Republican JM Lozano gets partial credit for Michelle Petty’s plurality vote in HD43, but that’s at least partly a function of the unusually high Libertarian vote in that race, which generally suppressed Nathan Hecht’s percentages. Note how much more Hecht diverges from Romney than Petty does from Obama to see what I mean. Without factoring possible turnout differences into account, Dems have maybe six viable flip opportunities – Lozano, four Dallas seats, and HD54 – while the GOP has one clear shot and two other good ones. That’s assuming no further changes to the map, which may or may not be a good bet. Beyond that, we’ll have to see what the march of demographic change looks like and whether there’s anything to all this talk about investing in Texas Democratic infrastructure.
Pingback: Eye on Williamson » TPA Blog Round Up
Pingback: Texas blog roundup for the week of February 18 – Off the Kuff
Pingback: Precinct analysis: Comparing 2012 and 2008, Senate and SBOE edition – Off the Kuff