Here’s an op-ed from the Statesman about one educator in West Texas who has had enough.
My hero this week is Graydon Hicks, Fort Davis superintendent of schools.
A West Texas publication published his open letter to Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick raking them over the coals for “the lack of positive legislative action for public schools in Texas” at the most recent session, which adjourned at the end of May without passing a school finance bill.
Hicks is a West Point graduate and an experienced school administrator. He is no-nonsense guy who does not mince words. After detailing the effect of shrinking state financial support for public schools on Fort Davis schools over the past 10 years — combined with an increasing number of unfunded mandates and requirements — Hicks wrote, “How much more do you want to harm our children?
“If your intent is to dissolve public education (and your actions are more than a clear signal of such), then simply go on the record with that statement and remove the state’s authority to further overburden us without financial support. Quit pontificating about bathrooms. Quit hiding your intentions behind righteous statements about school vouchers and choice.”
Hicks accompanied his letter with a chart showing the annually declining amount of state funding available to the Fort Davis school district and the increasing burden on local taxpayers since 2008. That year, state funding amounted to $3.9 million, or 68 percent of the school district’s budget. Local property taxes provided $1.8 million, or 32 percent. In 2017, the state will contribute $378,000 — about one-tenth of its 2008 commitment, or 15 percent of the total budget. Local taxes this year will provide $2.2 million, or 85 percent.
“The Fort Davis ISD has 226 students,” Hicks wrote. “It has no cafeteria, has no bus routes, has dropped our band program, has eliminated (or not filled) 15 staff positions, has cut stipends for extra-curricular activities, has frozen (or reduced) staff pay for one year, has cut extra-curricular programs, has no debt, and has increased our local tax rate to the maximum allowed by the law.
“We have nothing left to cut.”
I agree that Superintendent Hicks sounds like a fine fellow who is speaking truth to power. That said, I feel compelled to point out how Jeff Davis County (*), which is where Fort Davis ISD, voted in the last gubernatorial election:
Governor
Greg Abbott 623 60.54%
Wendy R. Davis 366 35.57%
Kathie Glass 31 3.01%
Brandon Parmer 9 0.87%
Lieutenant Governor
Dan Patrick 560 56.62%
Leticia Van de Putte 375 37.92%
Robert D. Butler 48 4.85%
Chandrakantha Courtney 6 0.61%
Hold that thought. Now here’s a similar story about the school funding woes in West Texas:
Educators were excited to hear Gov. Greg Abbott announce he would call lawmakers back to Austin for a special legislative session to consider $1,000 teacher pay raises.
But Donna Hale, superintendent at 200-student Miami ISD in rural Roberts County, is wondering where the money is going to come from. An unfunded mandate, she said, could throw a wrench into their already difficult budgeting process.
“That’s the last thing we really need – the state saying you’ve got to do this when they’re not offering any support for us,” said Hale, who already doubles as the district’s librarian and said she was considering taking over as principal to cut payroll costs.
A wind farm and a sea of oil and natural gas wells in Roberts County has been good to Miami ISD, giving the district a flush tax base to pay for teachers and buildings. But its $1 billion dollar tax roll was cut in half this last year amid tumbling oil and gas prices. A state aid provision that it has relied on in recent years to guard against economic downturns expires in September and will take more than a third of the district’s budget with it.
Many rural schools like Miami ISD, the only school district in the county, are facing a similar dilemma and pleading with the State Legislature to act. Lawmakers return to the Capitol next month for a legislative overtime period, but school finance reform has taken a back seat to bills regulating bathroom use and creating a school choice program.
Again, I sympathize, and again, I wonder how did Roberts County vote in 2014?
Governor
Greg Abbott 324 93.91%
Wendy R. Davis 15 4.35%
Kathie Glass 5 1.45%
Brandon Parmer 1 0.29%
Lieutenant Governor
Dan Patrick 320 93.29%
Leticia Van de Putte 12 3.50%
Robert D. Butler 10 2.92%
Chandrakantha Courtney 1 0.29%
I think you get where I’m going with this. Now, I will stipulate that in 2014, one might have been able to believe that Greg Abbott, who was touting an expansion of pre-K, and Dan Patrick, who had served as the Senate Education Committee chair and had passed some bipartisan bills during that time, could at least have been okay on education and school finance issues. Here in June of 2017, after a session that included the Senate refusing to consider HB21 and a special session that includes vouchers on the agenda, it’s really hard to believe that now. Further, both counties are represented in the Lege by pro-education members. Roberts County is served by Sen. Kel Seliger, who was the only Senate Republican to oppose the main voucher bill, and by Rep. Ken King, who was endorsed by Texas Parent PAC in the 2012 primary. Jeff Davis County has two Democrats, Sen. Jose Rodriguez and Rep. Cesar Blanco, in the Lege. Both were unopposed in 2016, and Blanco was unopposed in 2014, but in all three cases they drew a comparable number of votes to Republicans on the ballot. In addition, former Rep. Pete Gallego carried Jeff Davis County in 2010, even as Rick Perry and the rest of the Republicans were also winning it. The voters there do vote for pro-education candidates. Will they – and other counties like them – recognize in 2018 that “pro-education” does not describe Abbott or Patrick? I for one will have a lot more sympathy for their plight if they do.
(*) Yeah, I know.
Jeff Davis County is in Poncho Nevárez’ (D-Eagle Pass) district, not Cesar Blanco’s (D-El Paso), although Poncho is also pro-education.
As far as the county’s name, that was given by the Lege and was intended as a stick in the eye to local residents. The county was primarily settled by pro-Union Northerners after the Civil War.
I’ll add that Nevárez was unopposed in both years receiving 524 votes from the county in ’14 and 622 in ’16.
I’ll also add that another reason the Lege wanted to name the county after Jefferson Davis was because the old army fort at Fort Davis had a large number of African-American “Buffalo Soldiers” that gave the county census figures as high as being nearly one-third Black at times in the late 19th Century. Those were crazy-high numbers for any county outside of East Texas at the time.