RNC scales down Hispanic outreach efforts

Fine by me.

A Hispanic outreach center that the National Republican Committee opened on San Antonio’s Southeast Side in 2021 is among numerous minority outreach offices across the country that have been shuttered for the 2024 election cycle.

Democrats say the closures are a signal the GOP no longer cares about courting Hispanic voters, while Republicans say the investments in traditionally blue territory didn’t make sense in this year’s challenging national political landscape.

The now-shuttered Hispanic outreach center in the Highlands neighborhood, which served as a gathering point for congressional candidate Cassy Garcia in 2022, offers some evidence for both perspectives.

Its closure — part of an overall scaled-back presence in South Texas this election cycle — is in stark contrast to the optimistic message national Republicans were sending here just two years ago.

[…]

The RNC plans to maintain one South Texas Hispanic outreach center this year to support U.S. Rep. Monica De La Cruz in Texas’ 15th Congressional District — the only one of the 2022 targets Republicans successfully flipped last cycle.

Redistricting in 2021 turned that seat from slightly favoring Democrats to slightly favoring Republicans, but De La Cruz faces a potentially contentious rematch with Democrat Michelle Vallejo. National Democrats are targeting that race and putting big money into Latino voter outreach nationwide.

I suspect this is partly about prioritizing incumbent protection over seeking targets to flip, especially after neither CDs 28 nor 34 proved to be particularly reachable for them in the favorable-in-Texas environment of 2022, and one part the reality that the RNC now exists to funnel money to Donald Trump and his lawyers. Not a whole lot of money left for anything else after that. There may be some downstream effects in their efforts to hold onto State House districts like HD37 and HD118, and their effort to flip SD27, which again is all fine by me. This also doesn’t mean there won’t be money from other sources in these areas and doing this work, it just won’t be RNC money. I hope we look back on this as a bad decision by the GOP. The Current and Reform Austin have more.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on RNC scales down Hispanic outreach efforts

County leaders defend Uplift Harris

I appreciate the passion and intensity in this response, but overall it does not leave me feeling optimistic about the outcome.

Harris County leaders are defending their new guaranteed income program after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office sued to stop the initiative from going into effect, accusing the attorney general of targeting the Houston area while overlooking similar programs in San Antonio, Austin and El Paso.

At a news conference on Wednesday, Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo called the timing of the lawsuit “cruel” and “unscrupulous,” alleging Paxton’s office waited until recipients had been notified they had been selected for the program before filing the lawsuit.

Harris County approved its pilot program last June, which aims to send $500 monthly payments for 18 months to around 1,900 low-income households. Now, with recipients notified and the first payments scheduled for later this month, Paxton’s office has asked a Harris County district court judge to stop the checks from going out and rule that the program is unconstitutional under state law.

Commissioner Rodney Ellis said it was clear the state had become “too comfortable with using people as props,” and some of the county’s poorest residents could pay the price.

Though the $20.5 million Uplift Harris program is funded using a portion of the county’s federal pandemic recovery dollars, Paxton’s office is arguing the program violates a state law that prohibits the gift of public funds to any individual.

[…]

Paxton’s lawsuit is part of a broader movement to oppose the guaranteed income pilot programs that have emerged around the country in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. State lawmakers in Arizona, Iowa and Wisconsin have introduced legislation to prohibit programs that were implemented in Phoenix, Des Moines and Madison. Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, vetoed the bill last year on the grounds that he objected to the Legislature’s “continued efforts to arbitrarily restrict and preempt local government partners across our state.”

Paxton’s office also questioned the legality of the Uplift Harris selection process, according to the lawsuit filed Tuesday.

In the first stage of the process, some 6,000 eligible applicants were randomly selected from the over 82,000 applications received. Finally, around 1,900 participants were randomly selected from that group. To be eligible, applicants had to live below 200% of the federal poverty line and live in one of 10 high-poverty zip codes or participate in the ACCESS Harris County public health program.

The Attorney General’s office argued Uplift Harris violated state law because it used a “random lottery” to select participants, a method employed in numerous programs including the Houston Housing Authority’s public housing waitlist and the City of Austin’s rental assistance fund.

Though Menefee, Ellis and Hidalgo vowed to defend the program all the way to the Texas Supreme Court, they said Wednesday they doubted that the state’s top justices – all of whom are elected Republicans – would deliver a ruling that rises above partisan politics.

Menefee admitted he is “less than confident” that the county will receive fair treatment, particularly from Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine, who made headlines last week for remarks he made at a conservative event that included criticism of Harris County.

See here for the background. Devine is a genuine problem, but if the fix is indeed in then it almost doesn’t matter. Again, I don’t know enough about the law here to make an educated guess about anything, but we know Ken Paxton rarely has a strong legal argument when he files these lawsuits. He’s banking on the refs being on his side. Sometimes that doesn’t work for him. Maybe this is one of those times. At this point, I don’t know what else to say.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Some of those dropped HPD cases were connected to other cases

Shocking, I know.

Of the suspended sex crime incident reports submitted by the Houston Police Department to the Houston Forensic Science Center, nearly 100 came back with links to other cases, Chief Troy Finner said Monday evening.

[…]

In HPD’s initial review, 4,017 of those suspended incident reports had been identified as adult sex crimes, Finner wrote in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Finner wrote that the department had met with the forensic science center and the Harris County District Attorney’s Office to get a second level of review and address the way the agencies communicated regarding DNA related to both sex crime cases and other offenses.

A list of adult sex crime incident reports was provided by HPD to the forensic science center following a March 27 meeting, and of the 4,017 incident reports, 1,147 had sexual assault kits tested for DNA. Of that number, 76 of those matched with perpetrators in other offenses. Finner directed all cases regardless of offense title be sent to the forensic science center, and that resulted in another 20 matches to other cases, he wrote.

Finner said that investigators are reviewing those incident reports to follow up on investigations.

See here and here for some background. The review of the dropped cases is ongoing, so that number is likely to go up. This is hardly a surprise, any large number of randomly selected cases would include some number that are connected. In theory, these shouldn’t be “random” cases but ones that were deemed low probability to be solved and thus not worth the HPD resources needed to investigate them. If nothing else, this casts the decision to discard them like this in a more harsh light. We’ll see what that committee that the Mayor put together comes up with.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Some of those dropped HPD cases were connected to other cases

FEC complaint filed over Cruz’s podcasting gig

Go for it.

I hear Cancun is nice

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz is facing a formal campaign finance complaint over money sent from the company that syndicates his podcast to a political action committee supporting his reelection bid.

The complaint, filed Tuesday with the Federal Election Commission, alleges Cruz may have improperly directed radio distribution and marketing firm iHeartMedia to send over $630,000 to the Truth and Courage PAC, a group dedicated to Cruz’ reelection effort. The amount would exceed the $5,000 limit an officeholder is permitted to solicit for a super PAC.

End Citizens United and the Campaign Legal Center filed the complaint and are seeking a formal FEC investigation into the payments.

The terms of iHeartMedia’s payments are unclear. The company’s agreement with Cruz for distributing his podcast is not public. But the complaint asserts that Cruz could have violated campaign finance laws if he directed iHeartMedia to give to the super PAC by exceeding the solicitation limit.

The complaint also asserts the payments were improperly reported as “other receipts” rather than campaign contributions. “Other receipts” is generally reserved for interest or income on assets already owned by a PAC.

“By soliciting or directing $630,850.08 of iHeartMedia’s corporate funds to or on behalf of TCP in connection with his 2024 election, Cruz appears to have brazenly violated these federal campaign finance laws,” the complaint reads.

See here for the background. No one should get excited over the filing of an FEC complaint; the gridlocked-by-design nature of the FEC generally ensures that it can’t do much of anything, and even if it could the most likely outcome would be a modest fine. Still, this does accomplish the objective of extending the news cycle and giving the Allred campaign the chance to refer to the alleged violations in its advertising. There’s also an easy off ramp for Cruz if he wants to take it: Either tell iHeartMedia and his PAC to knock off the payments, or resign from the Senate and podcast full time, since that’s clearly something he actually cares about, unlike Senatoring. All problems should be this easy to solve. The Current has more.

Posted in Election 2024, Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of April 8

This Texas Progressive Alliance weekly roundup is best viewed through eclipse glasses.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of April 8

Interview with Austin Pooley

Austin Pooley

We continue with our interviews for the three now-elected At Large positions on the Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD) Board. The first person I heard from after I had posted about the HCAD announcement of the race and how to apply to be a candidate is today’s interview subject, Austin Pooley. Pooley, who is a 2012 graduate of Texas A&M with a degree in finance, worked for two years at HCAD after graduation, so naturally he was interested in this election. He worked as a Residential Appraiser during his time at HCAD, learning how to appraise property and navigating residents through the protest process. He currently works in the energy industry as an Energy Efficiency Program Manager, helping to weatherize homes for low-income customers. He is running for Position 2. Here’s what we talked about:

PREVIOUSLY:

Pelumi Adeleke

See here and here for what we know about these HCAD positions. I will have two more interviews next week. Early voting for this race and the SD15 special election runs from April 22-30.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Paxton sues over Uplift Harris

Whatever.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Harris County over Uplift Harris, its new guaranteed income pilot program, calling the effort to administer $500 monthly payments to low-income residents the “Harris Handout.”

Though participants have been selected and notified already, Paxton is aiming to stop what he argues is an “illegally implemented” program. He is asking the court to grant a temporary restraining order to prevent the program from being implemented and to declare that Uplift Harris is unconstitutional under state law.

Around 1,900 participants selected to receive the payments were notified last month, with the first checks expected to be sent out as early as April 24. The Uplift Harris program, which is federally funded using the county’s American Rescue Plan Act dollars, is designed to distribute the payments for 18 months.

But now, 10 months after the program was announced, Paxton’s office is challenging the initiative following an inquiry from Republican state Sen. Paul Bettencourt.

[…]

In January, Bettencourt asked Paxton’s office to weigh in on whether counties have the authority to carry out a guaranteed income program and if such an initiative would violate a state law that prohibits the gift of public funds to any individual.

[Harris County Attorney Christian] Menefee previously has argued that the program does not violate the clause because it accomplishes a legitimate public purpose and has sufficient controls in place to prove its purpose and measure its effectiveness.

However, Paxton’s office has reached a different conclusion, making the case that the program does not accomplish a public purpose and Harris County does not retain public control over the funds since recipients are given the money with “no strings attached.”

Harris County Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis on Tuesday called Uplift Harris a “transformational hand-up” rather than the “handout” Paxton described.

“This lawsuit from Ken Paxton reads more like a MAGA manifesto than a legal document,” Ellis said in a statement.

I have not written about Uplift Harris before now, so follow the links in the excerpt to learn more. I don’t have an informed opinion about the legal merits of this case, but suffice it to say that there’s never a reason to take Ken Paxton’s word for anything. All that really matters is whether there’s a court he can get to that’s wired to give him what he wants. This paragraph from the Trib story makes me think that at the least this isn’t a clear winner for him:

Harris County is the latest Texas locality to experiment with guaranteed income programs, following efforts in Austin, San Antonio and El Paso County. Local officials across the country turned to such efforts in recent years to help needy families weather high housing and food costs and bounce back from the pandemic’s economic fallout. Beneficiaries of a guaranteed income pilot program in Austin, which ended last year, received $1,000 a month and mostly used that money to help them stay housed as the city faced exorbitant increases in home prices and rents, an Urban Institute survey found.

While there are obviously differences in what cities can do versus what counties can do, the fact that none of these other programs – including as noted one in El Paso County, which would be equivalent to Harris’ – had drawn this level of scrutiny is worth pondering. Maybe Bettencourt didn’t care until it happened here, I don’t know, and yet it still took him the better part of a year to question it. It’s hard not to smell the political motives in this, is what I’m saying. Houston Landing has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

The STAAR test will be graded by AI this year

Surely something like this was inevitable.

Students sitting for their STAAR exams this week will be part of a new method of evaluating Texas schools: Their written answers on the state’s standardized tests will be graded automatically by computers.

The Texas Education Agency is rolling out an “automated scoring engine” for open-ended questions on the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness for reading, writing, science and social studies. The technology, which uses natural language processing technology like artificial intelligence chatbots such as GPT-4, will save the state agency about $15-20 million per year that it would otherwise have spent on hiring human scorers through a third-party contractor.

The change comes after the STAAR test, which measures students’ understanding of state-mandated core curriculum, was redesigned in 2023. The test now includes fewer multiple choice questions and more open-ended questions — known as constructed response items. After the redesign, there are six to seven times more constructed response items.

“We wanted to keep as many constructed open ended responses as we can, but they take an incredible amount of time to score,” said Jose Rios, director of student assessment at the Texas Education Agency.

In 2023, Rios said TEA hired about 6,000 temporary scorers, but this year, it will need under 2,000.

To develop the scoring system, the TEA gathered 3,000 responses that went through two rounds of human scoring. From this field sample, the automated scoring engine learns the characteristics of responses, and it is programmed to assign the same scores a human would have given.

This spring, as students complete their tests, the computer will first grade all the constructed responses. Then, a quarter of the responses will be rescored by humans.

When the computer has “low confidence” in the score it assigned, those responses will be automatically reassigned to a human. The same thing will happen when the computer encounters a type of response that its programming does not recognize, such as one using lots of slang or words in a language other than English.

“We have always had very robust quality control processes with humans,” said Chris Rozunick, division director for assessment development at the Texas Education Agency. With a computer system, the quality control looks similar.

Every day, Rozunick and other testing administrators will review a summary of results to check that they match what is expected. In addition to “low confidence” scores and responses that do not fit in the computer’s programming, a random sample of responses will also be automatically handed off to humans to check the computer’s work.

TEA officials have been resistant to the suggestion that the scoring engine is artificial intelligence. It may use similar technology to chatbots such as GPT-4 or Google’s Gemini, but the agency has stressed that the process will have systematic oversight from humans. It won’t “learn” from one response to the next, but always defer to its original programming set up by the state.

“We are way far away from anything that’s autonomous or can think on its own,” Rozunick said.

But the plan has still generated worry among educators and parents in a world still weary of the influence of machine learning, automation and AI.

You can read on for a listing of those concerns, which are about what you’d expect: This is too new and untested, it’s not fair to the kids or to the schools given the high stakes of the STAAR, it’s being sprung on us with no notice, AI isn’t good enough yet to tackle a task like this, and so on. There is a way to challenge the score you get, whether from automated grading or a human reviewer; it costs $50 to request a re-grade and the fee is later waived if the score goes up as a result, but I didn’t see anything to suggest that those who can’t afford the fee up front can get the same consideration. It’s nice that this will save a few bucks, but at a time when the state is sitting on $30 billion in surplus and no new funds were allocated to public schools because Greg Abbott kept that all hostage to his voucher dreams, any talk of savings has a bitter tinge.

As I said, I think we could all see this sort of thing coming. Humans aren’t infallible as graders either, and surely this will take less time to perform. Maybe it will get to a point where the process is seen as more objective and thus fairer, or at least less likely to be affected by random factors. Whenever this was to be done for the first time, the same complaints were likely to be raised. I fully expect there to be problems, some of which will seem unbelievable and ridiculous, but I also expect that over time, probably less time than we think, it will improve to the point where few people will think the old way was better. I still wouldn’t want my kid to be one of the beta testers for this, and I fully sympathize with the fears expressed by teachers, administrators, and everyone else. I hope it’s done reasonably well and I hope the TEA responds quickly and compassionately to the problems that will arise. And we still need to elect a better government because everything that’s been happening with public education lately – among many other things – is just screwed up and we deserve so much better.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

So what’s Mayor Whitmire’s deal with Vision Zero?

The Chron editorial board thinks he won’t be some destroyer of non-automotive transit. I’ll remain politely skeptical for now.

Mayor John Whitmire

John Whitmire insists he supports Vision Zero, the city’s action plan to make Houston streets safer. The ultimate goal is zero people losing their lives in car crashes by 2030. Zero pedestrians killed just crossing a street. Zero new ghost bikes haunting curbs across town where cyclists died nearby.

Some are questioning Whitmire’s commitment to street safety after a few recent moves, including the removal of concrete medians recently installed along Houston Avenue and his ordering a review of bike lanes and other features of the new 11th Street redesign in the Heights.

[…]

For his part, Whitmire sees the 11th Street project as something that started with a simple request for a safe crossing at the busy Nicholson Street intersection and morphed into an elaborate design. The result, he says, is a rush-hour bottleneck so severe that fire officials have told him they’ll have to avoid 11th Street entirely. Whitmire said similar concerns on Houston Avenue prompted him to remove the controversial medians: a Metro bus had previously gotten stuck there and a nearby fire station complained the medians made it more difficult for their trucks to turn.

“All I’m saying is use some common sense,” Whitmire told us. “As long as there’s 2.3 million people in the city, you’re gonna have traffic. Houston Avenue is an artery to get up on the freeway.”

He noted that Houston is unlike major American cities organized around transit such as New York. Our city is bisected by several major freeways, which ferry Houstonians to neighborhoods that sprawl endlessly in all directions.

He’s right. Houston is also the nation’s second-fastest growing metropolitan region, with more than 7 million people, according to census data. We could add another 3 million residents by 2040. If everybody brings their cars, streets and freeways will be even more clogged. We need alternatives.

Complacency is not an option. Neither is haste. Scrapping the careful planning of the Turner administration would be a mistake. While advocates were, at times, frustrated by the slow pace of redesign projects under Turner, he deserves credit for encouraging a data-driven approach that included mapping out every high-injury corridor all over the city. That map should be his starting point. It shows that 9% of Houston streets account for nearly 60% of traffic deaths and serious injuries.

We came away from our interview with the mayor persuaded that he intends to keep some version of Turner’s Vision Zero Action Plan. We believe he wants to stop the deaths and injuries and we admire his vision of doing it equitably, making sure, for instance, that more neglected neighborhoods get 3-foot sidewalks before others get 10-foot sidewalks.

Whitmire understandably wants to put his stamp on transportation policy, but we urge him to put Houstonians’ safety before any political considerations or disagreements with strident advocates. A mayor as committed to public safety as Whitmire should take an all-of-the-above approach to street safety that includes traffic enforcement and street redesigns that slow drivers down. In 2023 alone, there were 323 traffic fatalities in Houston. Most were motorists, followed by pedestrians and cyclists. That figure is actually a marginal improvement, eight fewer fatalities than in 2022.

Whitmire told us he would release a comprehensive plan within a few months. The theme will be “options.” That includes modernizing Metro to include ride share programs and more efficient bus routes; installing and raising crosswalks all over the city; improving mobility for motorists; and beefing up traffic enforcement.

Part of the reason why I remain skeptical is because I do drive along West 11th and it’s just not that bad. It’s also a lot easier to cross or make a left onto 11th from one of the side roads now that there are two lanes of moderate speed traffic instead of four lanes of cars going 40 or more coming at you. I’m also squinting at what he’s saying about Metro – what exactly does he see ride share services offering and at what price? We just did a massive redesign of the bus network a few years ago, it’s a hell of a lot more sensible now and the high-frequency routes carry lots of riders, what does he think is missing? Basically, as with some other things we could mention here, the problem is a lack of information about what the plans are.

Texas Monthly has a post up now about how Whitmire is a “20th century Mayor for a 21st century Houston”, and that’s going to live in my brain for a long time. I hope it turns out to be an overbid and not a prophecy. But if it turns out to be the latter, that’s a pretty compelling starting point to a campaign for whoever might challenge the Mayor in 2027.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Several Dem legislators want to investigate HISD

We’ll see if this goes anywhere.

Several Houston-area Democratic legislators are calling for a formal hearing to address “potential violations of state law” in Houston ISD in the aftermath of the Texas Education Agency stripping elected leaders from the school district.

The lawmakers asked in a letter sent Friday that the House Committee on Public Education host a hearing to address reports of “unqualified, non-degree holding teachers” working in classrooms and a lack of accommodations for students with disabilities. They also requested independent research proving the benefits of state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles’ New Education System.

The request comes after the state takeover of HISD in March 2023 and the Texas Education Agency’s appointment of the Superintendent and nine members of the Board of Managers. Due to the takeover, the nine lawmakers who signed the letter said it is “imperative that the state assume full responsibility for HISD students and hold the board of managers accountable”

“As their duly elected State Representatives, we must hold a hearing to learn more about these concerning reports and efforts to subvert state laws and requirements,” the letter states.

Reps. Christina Morales, Ann Johnson, Jarvis Johnson, Penny Morales Shaw, Mary Ann Perez, Jon Rosentahl, Shawn Thierry, Hubert Vo and Gene Wu all signed the letter, which was addressed to Speaker of the Texas House Dade Phelan and the House education committee. Phelan and TEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter.

“Teacher reports and parent concerns are uncovering troubling developments at our schools,” Morales wrote in a statement. “The community can no longer vote on who represents us on the school board, so we as the state representatives must hold the appointed board accountable.”

In a response to the letter, HISD said it was going to stay focused on “the critical work of serving students and families,” and it had already seen positive impacts for kids after implementing reforms.

“HISD has invited dozens of elected and community leaders into our schools to see the work happening first-hand,” the district wrote. “We are pleased to share our progress with any other leaders who want to better understand what’s happening in the schools.”

[…]

According to the letter, the district has circumvented the law requiring teachers to obtain a bachelor’s degree, a certification and other requirements to work in a classroom by assigning certified teachers as the teacher of record for more than one classroom.

“These efforts are not only detrimental to the continued learning and development of our students, but also a violation of state law,” lawmakers said.

The Democratic lawmakers also said the district has shared plans with teachers and administrators to address a teacher shortage by hiring community college students as teacher apprentices and learning coaches.

I appreciate what they’re doing here. I note that all they can do is ask for something to happen; they don’t have the power right now to do anything directly themselves. They can’t even use the time-honored tactic of applying pressure on the HISD Board members because oops, none of them are elected and the only accountability they have is to the TEA itself. Maybe there’s a lawsuit that could be filed over some of those allegations, I have no idea. But this is what happens when the people lose their voice. And what happens next, which likely will be nothing because what incentive does Dade Phelan or whoever would bring in some independent researchers have to do anything, is what we get.

Posted in School days, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Several Dem legislators want to investigate HISD

The Find Out PAC

I thought I had written about this before but I hadn’t, so here it is.

Texas’ Supreme Court has taken center stage in interpreting the state’s abortion laws in cases that have garnered national attention. And a new Democratic political effort targets three justices who they say “fucked around” — and will “find out.”

Gina Ortiz Jones, a two-time Democratic congressional candidate and former under-secretary in the U.S. Air Force, launched the Find Out PAC to target Republican Justices Jimmy Blacklock, John Devine and Jane Bland, who are up for reelection in November.

Jones launched the PAC after the Texas Supreme Court’s high-profile ruling in December in the case of Kate Cox, the first adult in decades to petition a court to obtain an abortion. The Supreme Court blocked Cox, a Dallas-area mother of two, from getting an abortion in the state after her fetus was diagnosed with full trisomy 18, a chromosomal abnormality that is almost always fatal before birth or soon after. The pregnancy also posed severe risks to Cox’s health.

“The Kate Cox factor could change everything,” Jones said.

[…]

The Find Out PAC’s goal, Jones said, is to direct voter anger over the state’s abortion bans to the state Supreme Court, whose nine justices are all Republicans.

“These justices, who we’re calling Jimmy, John and Jane, are deeply embedded in this far-right movement to strip rights from Texans and Americans,” said Democratic State Rep. James Talarico, a supporter of the effort. “They’re starting with reproductive rights, but they’re not going to stop there.”

The Find Out PAC and its supporters, which include multiple state and federal office holders, aim to elevate the public’s consciousness about the court, whose justices are elected to six-year terms and run under the banners of political parties.

“​​So much of this is opaque. So much of this is deliberately confusing to try to prevent folks from participating in the political process,” Talarico said. “And so our goal here is to educate and empower voters across our state to take back their freedoms.”

Jones doesn’t shy away from provocative and profane language in promoting her message.

“We’re going to talk about this issue in a way some people are not comfortable with,” Jones said. “It’s a big opportunity for us.”

You can see their launch video here. I’ve seen my share of PACs and other organizations come and go, with varying levels of success. I have hope for this one – Gina Ortiz Jones raised a bunch of money when she ran for Congress, and there’s just so much to run on in this environment – but in the end it’s the result that matters. I’ll be looking for their finance report in July as a starting point.

I certainly hope to see a coherent attack on the Republicans’ extreme positions on abortion and IVF, for which they currently have no good answer, but that’s not something I’m used to seeing. It’s usually every candidate for themselves. A PAC like this can at least provide some consistency to a message as well as a platform for launching attacks, if they can raise the money for it. The Supreme Court put themselves in this position thanks to the Cox case, and the best response is to make them all fear for their electoral future, starting with the three Justices on this year’s ballot. We know what the recent history of statewide Democratic campaigns is. There’s still no other way forward.

And while this PAC targets all three of the Justices on the ballot, it’s clear that one of them is worse than the others.

Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine is facing new questions about his impartiality after a clip went viral this week in which he implied that Democrats plan to cheat against presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump in the 2024 election.

“Do you really think the Democrats are going to roll over and let Trump be president again?” Devine asked in a keynote speech at the Texas Tea Party Republican Women’s 2023 Christmas event. “You think they’re just going to go away, all of a sudden find Jesus and [there will] be an honest election? I don’t think so.”

Devine is a former anti-abortion activist who claims that church-state separation is a myth and, as a state district judge in Harris County in the 1990s, fought to have a copy of the Ten Commandments posted in his courtroom. In his successful 2012 campaign for the Texas Supreme Court, he claimed to have been arrested 37 times at anti-abortion protests in the 1980s, and has since been a reliable ally of conservative, Christian voters in the state. Devine narrowly survived a GOP primary challenge last month that centered around his ethics, and now faces state district court Judge Christine Vinh Weems, a Democrat, in the November general election.

Devine’s comments on the 2024 election were heavily criticized by users on X, formerly Twitter, after a Texas Tribune reporter shared an excerpt of his speech on Thursday. Many users took issue with Devine’s comments, which they said raised doubts about whether he could neutrally rule on an issue that might appear before the Texas Supreme Court in the coming months or years.

Devine is an ethical quagmire in addition to being a complete nutjob. It’s a matter of making sure enough people know about him and recognize the need to boot him from the bench. Raising some money to inform them would help.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Once again seeking Comets 2.0

I would of course love to see this happen, but if it ever does it likely won’t be in the near future.

Travis Scott was struck by basketball motivation in the middle of the night — crack of the morning? — and let the world know what was on his mind.

“It’s 3:30 a.m. and I feel like Houston can bring back the Houston Comets. I’m gonna go for it!!!!,” the rapper who grew up in Missouri City posted to Twitter on Friday.

Scott, who was sitting courtside to watch Iowa’s Caitlin Clark break Pete Maravich’s NCAA scoring record last month, is far from the first Houston sports fan to have such an idea. Tampa Bay Bucs receiver Mike Evans, who was a child in Galveston when the Comets won the WNBA’s first four championships from 1997-2000, made a similar social media post in 2022, writing, “Bring the Houston Comets back. I love the WNBA.”

If only it were all so simple.

A WNBA expansion team hasn’t begun play since the Atlanta Dream joined the league in 2008, just six months before the Comets were disbanded in December 2008.

However, a surge in popularity has led the WNBA to expand again, officially awarding the Golden State Warriors a team that will begin play in San Francisco’s Chase Center in 2025. The expectation is that the league will add another franchise to give it an even 14 teams. However, Houston has never been mentioned as a candidate by league executives.

See here for the last time this came up. Multiple other cities have been cited as the next expansion possibility; I have no idea why Houston is overlooked. For that matter, I have no idea why the WNBA is being so conservative about expansion, at this moment when women’s basketball is as popular as it’s ever been. Sure seems like now is the time to capitalize on that and make a real investment in the league. And when you do, remember that the history of the WNBA can’t be told without the city of Houston.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Interview with Pelumi Adeleke

Pelumi Adeleke

I hope by now you are aware of the May 4 election for three At Large positions on the Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD) Board. These positions have existed before as appointments but thanks to the constitutional amendment about property taxes that was approved last year, three of those positions will be elected going forward, with the initial elections this May. I will have interviews with four of the candidates vying for these offices in Harris County, including at least one for each of the three slots. We begin today with Pelumi Adeleke, who is running for Position 3. She has been a business owner with an MBA and a masters in accounting who now works in business development for Amazon Web Services. She has received the endorsement of the Texas Gulf Coast Area Labor Federation in the race. Here’s the interview:

See here and here for what we know about these HCAD positions. I will have another interview on Wednesday and then two more next week. Early voting for this race and the SD15 special election runs from April 22-30, so it starts two weeks from today.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

“Reverse redlining”

Very interesting.

A novel legal argument is at the heart of a federal lawsuit against the sprawling Colony Ridge housing development in Liberty County that could prove a test case for similar claims around the country, experts say.

The lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in December is one of two initiated against Colony Ridge that claim the developers misled property buyers.

The federal government’s case may pose a more serious threat to Colony Ridge than the action brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in March because of its argument that the developers use language barriers as a tool to deceive customers and aim that deception at a protected class of people.

“In this case, it was very clear that they were targeting and identifying immigrants that come from specific countries and speak specific languages, so it shows an intent to target a particular group,” said Nicole Cabañez, a Skadden Fellow at the National Consumer Law Center who studies market access for those with limited English proficiency.

The federal government is attempting to interpret federal laws for housing and credit access to prove a theory of “reverse redlining” that argues Colony Ridge is harming a protected group by offering credit under unfavorable terms.

The two, separate lawsuits represent the best opportunity for restitution for the former Colony Ridge residents who say they were duped into buying property at sky-high interest rates that have caused thousands to default on their loans, experts say.

On their face, the lawsuits are similar. Both were filed in federal court. Both accuse the developers of lying to consumers about the land they were buying. Both spell out a business model built around flipping foreclosed lots of land at a profit for Colony Ridge, and both seek restitution for victims.

Lying to consumers about a product is illegal, no matter who is being lied to. But there are additional penalties written into the law against targeting people based on their race or national origin, Cabañez said.

Details about Colony Ridge’s business model and marketing scheme included in both lawsuits have convinced Cabañez the federal government’s additional argument is a “slam dunk.”

Colony Ridge marketing material frequently featured flags from Latin American nations, encouraging potential customers to “achieve the American dream here” in Spanish-language advertisements.

“You can’t get clearer on national origin than flags,” Cabañez said.

By accusing the developers of violating the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, which the state lawsuit does not do, the federal government hopes to prove discrimination against Spanish speakers is baked into Colony Ridge’s business model.

See here, here, and here for some background. As noted, this is a new argument, so it remains to be seen how it will play out in court. Which will likely take years, as that’s usually the speed at which federal lawsuits move. If this one proves successful, we’ll likely see the feds use it in other places. Read the rest to find out more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Wife of Harris County Justice of the Peace arrested on murder charge

Wow.

A woman who is accused of fatally shooting her nephew following a fight in northwest Harris County made her first court appearance early Saturday morning, according to documents.

Mei Wolfe, 48, is facing a murder charge after a deputies said an ongoing feud with her nephew led to her shooting him inside her home on Thursday night.

ABC13 learned the woman is the wife of Harris County Justice of the Peace Bob Wolfe.

The situation unfolded in the 24300 block of Tesino River Circle before 9:30 p.m.

The Harris County Sheriff’s Office says Wolfe’s recent college graduate nephew was staying with her after a few months of traveling.

Officials said the two got into an altercation after Mei felt that the victim overstayed his welcome. That is when Mei grabbed a pistol and fired a shot at one point, according to deputies.

Investigator said Wolfe’s husband, Bob, called 911 before unsuccessfully trying to stop the altercation and removing the weapon from his wife’s hand.

Wolfe’s nephew was pronounced dead at the scene. He was identified as 40-year-old James Wolfe II.

A judge granted Wolfe’s bond at $100,000. She was ordered not to have firearms and will have to surrender her passport if she bonds out.

The embedded video and the earlier report about her arrest have more details. This is first and foremost a personal and family tragedy for everyone involved so I will refrain from further comment at this time. As this could also have political implications down the line, I’m noting it for the record.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Wife of Harris County Justice of the Peace arrested on murder charge

Weekend link dump for April 7

“Twitter, now X, was once a useful site for breaking news. The Baltimore bridge collapse shows those days are long gone.”

“In Simpsons terms, the important thing about “Hi-diddly-ho, neighbor!” is not the “Hi-diddly-ho,” but the “neighbor.” That’s the difference between MAGA evangelicals and Ned Flanders. Ned views and greets everyone he encounters as his neighbor. MAGA evangelicals very much do not.”

“[Last] Tuesday, the Chinese government lodged a formal complaint against the United States government with the World Trade Organization, claiming the Inflation Reduction Act—signed by President Joe Biden in 2022—inappropriately excludes electric cars with Chinese components from the law’s tax credit program. Biden should be thrilled.”

“[Redacted], a professional demagogue, calling for responsibility in discourse is, as they say, a little bit rich.”

“But what some may see as a heartwarming tale of bridging political divides or a gallant effort to humanize election workers at the micro level, the Panera lunch is also reflective of a broader, grim reality for election workers: that they must continue trying to gain public trust and make themselves appear human to those who are still, four years later, wholly convinced that they are stealing elections from Donald Trump.”

“The argument in the mifepristone case was a potent reminder of why conservatives have gravitated to conscience claims—and demonstrated the hidden harms that these claims can inflict on other Americans.”

“The emotional harm alleged here is that unless these doctors approve of the specific circumstances of the ER visit, they violate not only their own medical preference but also their religious convictions. But they will never truly know enough about the sins of their patients to be able to shield themselves against being a link in a chain of subjective lifelong sin.”

A behind-the-scenes look at being a clerk for federal Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed jurist currently making a hash of the confidential documents case.

“The truth is that Donald Trump undermined faith in our elections in his false bid to retain the presidency. He sparked an insurrection intended to overthrow our government and keep himself in power. No president in our history has done worse.”

“The Heritage Foundation, the right-wing think tank organizing the plan for a conservative overhaul of the federal government known as Project 2025, recently published another blog critical of in vitro fertilization procedures, this one with a list of specific policy recommendations for limiting access to the reproductive method.”

“Four years ago today, I walked into the apocalypse.”

How to find an asshole. See here for more.

“Companies that rent portable toilets in Central Texas said they have experienced historic demand for their products as folks plan eclipse parties on ranches, in parks and even in backyards.”

RIP, Vontae Davis, former NFL cornerback.

So much grift, so many suckers.

RIP, Chance Perdomo, actor known for Gen V and Chilling Adventures of Sabrina.

RIP, Joe Flaherty, writer and performer on the groundbreaking sketch comedy show SCTV and actor best known for Freaks and Geeks.

RIP, pat Molak, co-founder of San Antonio mainstay restaurant Josephine Street and legendary music venue Gruene Hall.

“As it turns out, taking a photo of the 2024 solar eclipse could damage your iPhone’s camera hardware.”

“The Biden administration put the finishing touches Thursday on a plan to restrict presidents from unilaterally nixing civil service protections from large swaths of the federal workforce, as former President Donald Trump renews his vow to uproot a perceived “deep state” if he is returned to the White House.”

“On Wednesday, the IEEE Computer Society announced to members that, after April 1, it would no longer accept papers that include a frequently used image of a 1972 Playboy model named Lena Forsén. The so-called “Lenna image,” (Forsén added an extra “n” to her name in her Playboy appearance to aid pronunciation) has been used in image processing research since 1973 and has attracted criticism for making some women feel unwelcome in the field.”

“No such candidates emerged, so the responsible course of action is for us to stand down.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekend link dump for April 7

The Paxton prosecutors’ personal dispute

I’m just going to leave this here.

A crook any way you look

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton never would have been sent to prison if his fraud case had gone to trial, the prosecutors now say.

In the week since Paxton, a Republican, cut a deal to have his charges dropped and upcoming trial canceled, the two special prosecutors have traded barbs over how each handled the case. They’ve questioned each other’s choices, motives and even whether they’ve always been truthful with each other.

From indictment to deal, the case lasted nine years. The prosecutors entered the case as partners, longtime colleagues, even friends, and leave it as adversaries.

The one thing they do agree on: Neither thinks Paxton was going to end up behind bars.

During a Friday interview on WFAA, lead prosecutor Brian Wice was asked if prison was ever a likelihood if the case had gone to trial.

“The answer to your question is two words: absolutely never,” Wice said.

“I never envisioned any scenario, any universe in which, by which, through which, that a judge or jury put Ken Paxton in prison based on either the third-degree felony failing to register as an investment adviser rep, or, for that matter, the first-degree felony securities fraud cases,” he added.

In an interview with The Texas Newsroom, Wice’s former co-counsel agreed.

“That’s probably the one true thing that Brian [Wice] said,” said Kent Schaffer, who resigned from the prosecution in February after he and Wice split over how to handle the case.

[…]

Wice said he’d received a slew of hate messages from people who wanted to see Paxton answer to a jury. They questioned why a deal would be cut the month before Paxton was scheduled to go to trial — especially since the case had dragged on for as long as it did.

Schaffer, who was not part of the final negotiations, said it was “kind of stupid” that Paxton will do his community service in Collin County, where the attorney general has a home and practiced law for years. He believes Paxton will get more favorable treatment there.

“Anybody with an IQ over 60 understands Paxton’s never going to do one hour of community service,” Schaffer told The Texas Newsroom.

Cogdell said Paxton will “absolutely” comply with the terms of the deal.

Schaffer tried to cut a different deal with Paxton’s defense team before he stepped off the case. But Wice scuttled it, he said.

Then, on Feb. 16, the day Schaffer resigned from the case, Wice publicly criticized Schaffer’s deal as tantamount to giving Paxton “a cocktail, a hot meal and a breath mint” because he said it did not include restitution for the accusers.

Schaffer said his deal would have included restitution if Wice hadn’t cut off talks. Clapping back at his former partner, he told The Texas Newsroom that Wice’s deal is like giving Paxton “a cocktail and a hot meal and a backrub.”

He said Wice is unfairly criticizing his work on the case now to throw off scrutiny: “At this point, he’s just looking for somebody to get all the negative attention off him.”

In three pages of comments provided to The Texas Newsroom, Wice said Schaffer was the one unfairly criticizing him.

See here and here for some background. I don’t have much interest in litigating this – I have no idea who’s “right” and “wrong” in this Wice/Schaffer dispute – so I will just say two things. One is that Ken Paxton and his buddies did an awful lot to sabotage this case from the beginning, with the way that Collin County Commissioners Court refused to pay the special prosecutors being at the top of that list. In retrospect, it probably would have been for the best if this case could have been given to another county’s District Attorney for handling, as that would have largely settled the cost matter and left it up to people whose only job is to do prosecutions and didn’t have to worry about being properly compensated for it. And two, Ken Paxton is one lucky goddamn son of a bitch. A whole constellation of factors had to line up just right for him to end up without even having to plead guilty to something to get off like that, and they did. There’s a very small list of people who deserved that less than he did. If you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go light about a hundred candles for that grand jury in San Antonio.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Paxton prosecutors’ personal dispute

Still waiting on details for paying the firefighters

A lot of the same stuff we’ve heard before here, but a little bit more details.

Mayor John Whitmire

Houston Mayor John Whitmire detailed his last three months as the fourth-largest city’s top boss and outlined some of his ongoing projects in a one-on-one conversation with former Harris County Judge Ed Emmett Wednesday night.

Some of those plans include seeking voter approval to raise the property tax revenue cap and using his political experience to “mend” government relationships among local and state officials, which he addressed at an event with the Baker Institute for Public Policy.

Here are some important takeaways from the discussion:

The city is considering multiple ways to halt its anticipated economic shortfalls and pay for massive deals with some of its first responders. Whitmire believes all options are up for discussion. “We’re going to put everything on the table,” Whitmire said when asked how Houston plans to pay for the projected $1.3 billion firefighter deal. “We are the only major city in the state that doesn’t have a garbage fee,” he added.

In addition to a possible garbage fee, Whitmire plans to ask voters to increase their property taxes, a potential hike the city hasn’t seen in nearly two decades. “I will ask the public to make an exception for public safety on the revenue cap,” he said. “It would be $15 a month to have the response time for fire and police that I think a safe city needs. We’re a great city but we’ve got to protect our investment and go forward.”

[…]

While the city faces a potential $200 million budget hole, Whitmire suggested combining city and county department services to save some money, which could result in layoffs. It’s still unclear how the project would be implemented, but he said he’s open to the idea.

“We got two library systems and two parks, and I could go on and on,” Whitmire said. “We got 85 law enforcement agencies in Harris County. They don’t even talk to each other. They can’t talk to each other and help each other on the radio.”

There’s more in this earlier Chron story. The Houston Landing went into some detail about the pushback Mayor Whitmire has been getting from Council. The main new information here is the number specified for a property tax rate hike, though how much that might raise and how that would work with both the city and state revenue caps is unclear to me. Consolidating services with Harris County is an ongoing project – certainly the library is a ripe target for that given the recent goings on. It does take two to tango, and as much as the Mayor likes to talk about improving relations with the state government, he shouldn’t lose sight of the relationship we have with our county government. Some of the commissioners are fond of bicycles. I’m just saying.

Anyway. It’s my understanding that members of Council still haven’t seen the deal details, which one assumes they will need to do in order to vote on it. We still don’t know what a bond issue to fund the back pay looks like. I at least don’t know what happens if we do have a vote and it ends in failure. There’s still a lot to do, and there’s still a budget to write and pass. On we go.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 28 Comments

More Census changes coming

This seems like a good idea.

On the next U.S. census and future federal government forms, the list of checkboxes for a person’s race and ethnicity is officially getting longer.

The Biden administration has approved proposals for a new response option for “Middle Eastern or North African” and a “Hispanic or Latino” box that appears under a reformatted question that asks: “What is your race and/or ethnicity?”

Going forward, participants in federal surveys will be presented with at least seven “race and/or ethnicity” categories, along with instructions that say: “Select all that apply.”

After years of research and discussion by federal officials for a complicated review process that goes back to 2014, the decision was announced Thursday in a Federal Register notice, which was made available for public inspection before its official publication.

Officials at the White House’s Office of Management and Budget revived these Obama-era proposals after they were shelved by the Trump administration. Supporters of these changes say they could help the racial and ethnic data used to redraw maps of voting districts, enforce civil rights protections and guide policymaking and research better reflect people’s identities today.

[…]

OMB’s decision to change its statistical standards on race and ethnicity for the first time in more than a quarter-century also marks a major shift in the U.S. government’s definition of “White,” which no longer includes people who identify with Middle Eastern or North African groups such as Egyptian, Iranian, Iraqi, Israeli, Jordanian, Kurdish, Lebanese, Moroccan, Palestinian, Syrian and Yemeni.

That move sets up “Middle Eastern or North African” as the first completely new racial or ethnic category to be required on federal government forms since officials first issued in 1977 standards on racial and ethnic data that the Census Bureau and other federal agencies must follow.

For more than three decades, advocates for Arab Americans and other MENA groups have campaigned for their own checkbox on the U.S. census and other government forms, and recent research suggests that many people of MENA descent do not see themselves as white, a category that the federal government previously considered to include people with “origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.”

Studies by the bureau show that the government’s previous standards have also been out of step with many Latinos. Those standards required asking about a person’s Hispanic or Latino identity — which the federal government considers to be an ethnicity that can be any race — before asking about their racial identity.

Combining a question about Hispanic origins with a question about race into one question, while allowing people to check as many boxes as they want, is likely to lower the share of Latinos who mark the “Some other race” category on census forms, the bureau’s research from 2015 suggests.

Recent research, however, suggests it’s not clear how someone who identifies as Afro Latino is likely to respond to a combined race-ethnicity question. According to the Federal Register notice, about half of participants in a recent study for OMB selected only the “Hispanic or Latino” box when presented with a combined question after previously selecting both the Latino and Black categories.

This new question format, along with the addition of a “Middle Eastern or North African” box, could also decrease the number of people who mark the “White” box.

The point here is to get better Census data that more accurately reflects our current reality. There are nuances and there will still be some confusion and unclarity about how to answer the new questions, but I believe it’s worth the effort. It’s already the case that private enterprises like Amazon have their own data that’s at least as good as what the Census collects. Whether the Census can get its hands on that is likely to be another bitterly fought partisan issue, with Republicans doing everything they can to block it. If we have another Republican president in place for the next Census, who knows what kind of shenanigans we’ll see. That’s a worry for a later date. For now, this is where the Census would like to go.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on More Census changes coming

Hey look, it’s a story about the HCAD elections

About damn time.

A question you are unlikely to hear at any bar, diner or dinner table over the next month: Who are you voting for the county appraisal district board?

Few area residents are aware of the election, even though many of them voted to approve it only a few months ago.

In Harris County, the first-time election, scheduled May 4, has drawn 13 candidates seeking three seats on the nine-member Harris County Appraisal District board.

Voters will be asked to select governing members of the agency that determines annual property values used by local taxing entities to set their property tax rates and budgets. Appraisal district boards have the ability to hire and fire the county’s chief appraiser, the person in charge of carrying out property appraisals.

Last November’s state Proposition 4 set a temporary maximum on appraised property values and increased the homestead exemption, a tax break homeowners can place on their primary residence, from $40,000 to $100,000. The measure was overwhelmingly approved by 83 percent of voters.

Along with changes to the tax code, the final line of the proposition created four-year terms for three appraisal board positions in the 50 Texas counties with a population larger than 75,000. Previously, all nine members were appointed by local taxing entities represented by the district.

The changes to appraisal boards in the Houston region also apply to Liberty, Montgomery, Galveston, Brazoria and Fort Bend counties.

[…]

Terms for the elected board members will begin July 1 and last until July 31, 2026.

Election day will be held on a Saturday, coinciding only with the Texas Senate District 15 special election to fill the final eight months of Mayor John Whitmire’s vacated term.

The elections are being held quickly after November’s constitutional amendment so board members are in place before property tax season begins in the fall, [Sen. Paul] Bettencourt said. The May election day also serves to ensure the positions are nonpartisan and do not require a primary, further removing the process from political back-and-forth, the senator said.

Going forward, appraisal district board elections will be held in November.

[…]

The races are being held at significant cost to the appraisal district.

The May election is being administered by the Harris County Clerk’s office, but state law requires the appraisal district to cover the $4.1 million cost estimated by county officials. No estimate was available for a potential July runoff, according to the clerk’s office.

Election costs on crowded November ballots generally are spread among the political entities holding races, according to the clerk’s office.

State Rep. Mano DeAyala, R-Houston, argued the springtime election offers voters the opportunity to better familiarize themselves with the positions and candidates without other races competing for their attention.

“It’s a subject matter every voter should want to be informed about because it affects a vast majority … directly,” DeAyala said. “I think the voters are going to get engaged. I think the voters are going to get informed.”

The novelty and low attention on the elections has some suspicious of further meddling in Harris County’s affairs by the Texas Legislature.

“Everybody is kind of scratching their heads at this,” said Jay Malone, political director for the Gulf Coast Area Labor Federation. “Ultimately, the way we have to think about this is in the broader context of the attacks by the legislature on local control.”

Low voter turnout is likely, but the timing is necessary to allow new board members to get to work, state Rep. Shawn Thierry, D-Houston, wrote in a statement.

“It enhances the democratic nature of the appraisal process,” Thierry wrote. “By expanding the representation on the board, we ensure a diversity of perspectives and interests are considered, leading to more fair and equitable outcomes.”

The labor federation has endorsed Blueford-Daniels, Noriega and Adeleke in their respective elections.

Malone said the federation is supporting the trio because of their experience working for or with taxing entities. He said it was crucial to avoid electing someone who could support the board naming an ant-tax chief appraiser.

“Millions of dollars are being spent for an outcome that is really unclear,” Malone said. “We can speculate on the motivations, but in the context of the last two sessions where we saw all this legislation pass to defund schools and school services … we know there could be a risk to our really important revenue streams.”

That’s the first real story I’ve seen since January when we first learned about this new election. If you look at the list of candidates who filed for the races and compare it to those listed on that sample ballot the story links to, you’ll notice that two people have withdrawn, Era Ford and Melody Ellis. With at least three candidates in each race, we’re very likely to get at least one runoff, which will be in July.

I have done interviews with three of these candidates and I have a fourth one in the works; I’ll run them over the next two weeks. These are weird races because there’s not that much that appraisal district boards and their members actually do, at least in terms of things they can make promises about on a campaign trail. I think Jay Malone has the right idea here, so be sure to listen to the interviews I’ve done and make sure you get out and vote in this election, for which early voting begins on April 22 and runs through April 30. As noted in the story, the SD15 special election, now featuring just Molly Cook and Jarvis Johnson, is also on May 4, with the same early voting schedule. Turnout will be very light. Make your voice heard.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

“Extremely active” hurricane season coming

Be prepared.

The emergence of a La Niña weather pattern and warmer tropical waters could lead to an “extremely active” 2024 hurricane season, according to researchers at Colorado State University who issued their first hurricane season outlook of the year on Thursday. Colorado State’s outlook marks the first widely recognized hurricane forecast of the season and comes out more than a month before the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issues their seasonal outlook.

Colorado State University’s annual hurricane outlook, which is considered an authority in hurricane forecasts, has been published every April since 1995. This year’s hurricane outlook has the highest number of hurricanes ever projected in April, said Philip Klotzbach, a meteorologist and Atlantic basin seasonal forecast specialist at Colorado State.

“The team cites record warm tropical and eastern subtropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures as a primary factor for their prediction of 11 hurricanes this year,” researchers said in a statement.

Here’s how the numbers look and why this season is expected to be so active.

The number of named systems, which includes tropical storms, is forecast to be 23. Of that number, 11 are expected to become hurricanes and 5 of those could become major hurricanes, which are Category 3 or stronger. Major hurricanes bring wind speeds of at least 111 mph and often lead to the most costly damage.

This forecast is quite a bit higher than what the 30-year average from 1991 to 2020 shows. The projected number of named storms is nearly 9 more than average, with the number of expected hurricanes being roughly four more than average.

We’ve already had a couple of other forecasts saying similar things. The folks at Colorado State had a good track record, so their outlook is always anticipated. The main takeaway from this is not that you need to panic but that you should be prepared, in all the ways you should normally be prepared. We’ll deal with what comes as best we can. The Eyewall has more.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on “Extremely active” hurricane season coming

HISD discouraging STAAR test prep

Why must Mike Miles fold, spindle, and mutilate my brain like this?

As Houston ISD students prepare to take the STAAR in less than two weeks, appointed Superintendent Mike Miles is instructing schools to avoid direct test preparation, instead telling principals to have their teachers focus on daily lessons as usual.

The directive is a departure from the norm at many HISD schools, according to multiple district teachers and administrators, who say the weeks leading up to the exam usually included reviews of key concepts, mock tests and sometimes even “STAAR Olympics,” which included educational games to make test prep more engaging.

Miles laid out his instructions last Wednesday in his weekly email to principals, the information in which applies to all schools in HISD “unless specifically called out.”

“Neither the STAAR exams nor the NWEA and EOY assessments should be overemphasized for teachers and students,” Miles wrote in the email, which was obtained by the Houston Chronicle. “Teachers should focus on the curriculum and the quality of instruction. Students should focus on the (Demonstrations of Learning) and learning the objective for the day every day.”

“Direct instruction and a reasonable amount of (differentiated instruction) spent reviewing key concepts is OK. However, there should be little test prep — whereby students take a series of assessments to prepare for STAAR or NWEA,” he wrote.

Erin Baumgartner, the director of the Houston Education Research Consortium at Rice University’s Kinder Institute for Urban Research, said that the legacy of No Child Left Behind, the federal legislation signed in 2002 that required states to implement standardized tests, has made test prep standard practice at schools nationwide.

While mock exams and other strategies can help familiarize students with the format and presentation of a standardized test, she said, there is no evidence that explicit test prep necessarily leads to greater outcomes on the assessment itself.

“If test prep isn’t something that necessarily is shown to work, then it shouldn’t matter too much whether schools are doing a lot of it or not, but it’s become the norm,” Baumgartner said.

[…]

Some teachers and administrators expressed frustration with the directive and fear it could unfairly impact their evaluations, arguing it limits their ability to prepare students for a unique assessment they only take once a year. Even staunch opponents of standardized testing, such as Community Voices for Public Education co-founder Ruth Kravetz, said the lack of direct preparation could harm students and schools, given the high stakes associated with the results.

Kravetz, a former HISD teacher and administrator, said that the online-only format of the recently redesigned STAAR makes it necessary to familiarize students with the assessment before its administered, pointing to a Houston Public Media report that revealed 46% of fourth graders scored a zero out of 10 on the writing portion of the STAAR in 2023, the first year the new test was implemented.

“I can’t believe I have to argue for letting students review so they don’t go in cold. The fix is in at the front end and the back end, and that’s not the way we’re supposed to treat schoolchildren,” Kravetz said.

I’m no fan of the STAAR either, certainly not on the emphasis placed on it. But the fact remains that HISD was put into this cursed takeover status because of insufficient STAAR scores, and HISD will remain in this cursed takeover status until its STAAR scores improve to a particular level, and as such it sure seems weird to take such a seemingly indifferent attitude towards them, at least for this year. The STAAR also provides the first apples-to-apples comparison for the before-Miles and after-Miles era, so one way to interpret this is that HISD is just trying to lower expectations ahead of that. When you don’t trust the source, it’s easy to find nefarious motives in their actions.

Margaret Downing at the Press sums it all up nicely.

There is considerable irony in all this.

For years HISD parents and teachers justifiably complained that there was too much emphasis on the STAAR both in execution and test prep. Critics said students should be learning what they need to learn in classes designed to cover the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills criteria. This extra time spent preparing for one test is nothing more than gaming the systems with “strategies” and taking kids away from what they should be learning, they charged.

Well now they got — in part — what many of them asked for with a Superintendent who echoes those views. And a lot of them don’t like it. Their anxiety levels are rising and conspiracy theories have reached new levels: Is this being done so scores will tank and then the next year HISD Superintendent Mike Miles can show a dramatic improvement or call for more resources? Is this a way to get rid of more unwanted teachers? Is this a way to close down schools because no parent wants their child at a school with low test scores and with a drop in population those campuses will have to close, won’t they?

“No one likes teaching to the test but it’s those test scores that got our district in the situation it is and the scores are what will get us out. Is this intentional tanking?” one teacher asked.

Previously, passing the STAAR was a grade promotion requirement for students in grades 5 and 8 but the Texas Education Agency, saying it wanted to relieve pressure, dropped that part in 2023.

The pressure is still on for teachers, though. A big part of their annual assessment is based on how their students do on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness which began in the 2011-12 school year. Poor assessments can lead to not getting the school assignments they want or in worst cases, not having their contracts renewed.

The anxieties and rumors are probably part and parcel of not only a lack of trust of Miles and his academic and administrative policies in some quarters, but of an increasing wariness on the part of many teachers to share their true feelings with their administrators.

That we did too much STAAR prep before and that we are doing too little now can both be true. An administration that cared about its stakeholders and worked to build trust in the community could reasonably explain its change in strategy and what we should expect from it. That is not what we have here. As with everything Mike Miles has done, I feel I am forced to hope that he knows what he’s doing despite my strong misgivings. We’ll know in a few months how it turned out.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

That “Prop A committee”

I mentioned the establishment of a Proposition A committee yesterday, so let’s take a closer look at it.

CM Ed Pollard

Tensions flared at Houston City Council on Wednesday, as Mayor John Whitmire and council members clashed over the application of a new charter amendment that allows members to add items to council meeting agendas.

Last November, Houston voters passed Proposition A, an amendment that allows any three council members to come together and add an item to a council agenda, marking a sharp shift from the “strong mayor” system that dominated Houston politics for years.

[…]

Since Whitmire has taken office, his administration has created a Proposition A Committee that serves as a platform to review proposals that members want to bring forward.

The city charter does not require a council member to go through the committee in order to add an item to the agenda, but a lack of council feedback on a Wednesday agenda item sparked a heated debate at City Hall about Proposition A and Whitmire’s committee structure.

Council Member Edward Pollard presented an ordinance change that would make it easier for council members to add speed bumps in their neighborhoods. The agenda item was cosigned by Council Members Carolyn Evans-Shabazz, Fred Flickinger, Tarsha Jackson and Tiffany D. Thomas.

Whitmire told council at the start of the discussion that while he supported Proposition A, he thought Pollard could have approached the issue in a way that encouraged feedback from other council members, the public and first responders.

He stressed that he thought the item should go through the Proposition A Committee, and said that council members needed to consider the “unintended consequences” of the items they tried to add.

“I just think it would be better if you allowed a public hearing and let your colleagues that are not familiar with the process that you’re trying to correct play a role,” Whitmire said.

Pollard argued that his approach was in line with what voters approved in November and running proposals through committee was not a necessary step.

“That charter change was not meant for committee hearings,” Pollard said. “It was meant for council members to bring any item that is lawful to the agenda at any designated date. That is what it says.”

A city attorney told the council that while items did not need to be heard by the committee before being placed on the agenda, they were subject to the same rules as other agenda items once they were added. Whitmire argued that was the precise reason he believed the committee was necessary.

Since the speed bump item had not been discussed in committee, Whitmire said it required his office and the city’s legal department to rewrite it so that it was legally compliant.

As noted, this was in yesterday’s post, with a link to a Houston Landing story that covered a lot of this ground. As you know, I was very much a skeptic of this proposition when it was first announced – I thought three was too few Council members to trigger the agenda item, better to have more like six to make it harder to pull shenanigans with it – but over time I came to accept it as a worthwhile idea.

I was also a little skeptical when I first saw that the speed hump proposition had been referred to this committee, which I thought could be its own kind of speed hump, designed to at least slow down these proposed ordinances, if not deter them outright. On further reflection, I thought that was an overreaction – this isn’t the Legislature, I don’t think there are a plethora of ways to bottle up bills in the committee process. That said, it could certainly be a way of altering the initial proposals, perhaps to a form the Council members who brought it forward would find objectionable.

I take the Mayor’s point that the City Attorney should have some ability to review proposed ordinances to ensure they’re legally kosher, and there’s value in taking some time to vet and discuss them before a final vote. Where this will get contentious is if an ordinance put forward via the Prop A mechanism gets truly slow-walked or derailed; it’s not hard to imagine a lawsuit resulting from that. We’ll see how this plays out in practice, but for now I’ll take the Mayor at his word. I’m OK with the existence and use of this committee. And I await the outcome of that speed hump proposal.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Migrants’ lawsuit against company that flew them to Martha’s Vineyard can proceed

Of interest.

A federal judge in Boston has ruled that migrants flown from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard in 2022 can proceed with a lawsuit against the Florida company that took them there.

The judge also dismissed claims against Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other officials named in the suit.

Three migrants from Venezuela, along with an immigrant rights group, filed the lawsuit. They say that Florida’s governor, others in his administration and an air transport company conspired to mislead them and deprive them of their civil rights when they recruited and flew them to Martha’s Vineyard in 2022.

In their lawsuit, the migrants, identified as Yanet, Pablo and Jesus say they were told they were going to Massachusetts, but didn’t know their final destination was Martha’s Vineyard until shortly before landing.

The plaintiffs say a videographer hired by the DeSantis administration recorded them arriving and boarding vans. But apart from the videographer and van drivers, the plaintiffs say no one else in Martha’s Vineyard had any advance notice of their arrival.

In her order, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs says the case can proceed against the air transport company, Vertol. Judge Burroughs dismissed claims against Gov. DeSantis and other members of his administration out of jurisdictional concerns, but did so “without prejudice.” That means the legal team representing the migrants can seek to bring DeSantis and others back into the case as it goes forward.

In the 77-page filing, Judge Burroughs had harsh words for those involved in the scheme. “Vertol and the other Defendants here were not legitimately enforcing any immigration laws,” she wrote, adding, “the Court sees no legitimate purpose for rounding up highly vulnerable individuals on false pretenses and publicly injecting them into a divisive national debate.”

See here for some background. The Bexar County Sheriff later filed some charges relating to this but I don’t recall ever seeing the details about that; my guess it was mostly small-potatoes stuff. The city of Los Angeles took steps to sue Greg Abbott over the buses sent there, but again I haven’t seen much in the news about it since then. While it would be nice to haul the likes of Abbott and DeSantis into court over stull like this, successfully suing the bus companies and airlines that do their dirty work is almost as good, as if it costs them a big judgment to get involved, they’ll stop doing it. I suspect we have a long way to go with this one, so be patient. The Current has more.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Migrants’ lawsuit against company that flew them to Martha’s Vineyard can proceed

Dispatches from Dallas, April 5 edition

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth, it’s a grab bag with a lot of topics, including: cybersecurity; avian flu; scary anti-abortion GOP types; Tarrant County commissioners up to their usual shenanigans; immigration news; heat islands in Dallas; another theory about the Dallas City Council’s Project X; South Dallas news about Fair Park and the Forest Theater; the bling of a World Series ring; and baby Jameela the gorilla finds a foster mom at last.

This week’s post was brought to you by the ambient modern classical music of Nils Frahm, which is good accompaniment to writing.

This week we have something of a grab bag, so let’s dive into it:

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Dispatches from Dallas, April 5 edition

The Fifth Circuit has its merits hearing on SB4

This is the big one.

A federal appeals court heard arguments Wednesday from Texas and the federal government about whether it should continue blocking a new Texas law that would let state police arrest migrants suspected of entering the U.S. illegally.

The three-judge panel from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans now has to rule on the appeal of a lower court’s injunction that stopped Senate Bill 4 from going into effect. The same panel decided to keep SB 4 on hold a week ago until it could rule on whether the law is constitutional.

The Biden administration and civil rights organizations sued Texas to stop the law, claiming SB 4 is unconstitutional because it interferes with federal immigration laws. The law’s proponents have argued that the law simply mirrors federal law, which they claim is not being enforced by federal authorities.

Texas Solicitor General Aaron Lloyd Nielson told the appellate panel on Wednesday morning that the law was crafted in a way that “goes up to the line of Supreme Court precedent,” and conceded it may have crossed that line.

[…]

Nielsen said Wednesday that under the law, Texas “doesn’t deport anybody.” He said police would take migrants to a port of entry, which are controlled by the federal government.

“Texas takes them to a port of entry and the United States then decides what to do,” Nielsen said. “That’s critical about this … it’s portrayed as Texas is ourself just like flying people off to some other place and that’s not accurate.”

Mexican officials have said they won’t accept repatriations from Texas. Mexico has agreements with the federal government detailing which migrants it will accept after they’re deported by U.S. immigration officials.

Biden administration lawyer Daniel Bentele Hahs Tenny pointed to a part SB 4 that requires a person to be returned to the country from which they entered the U.S.

“They now say, I guess, that you don’t actually have to do that, that maybe you just go to the port of entry and that’s good enough,” Tenny said.

See here and here for the most recent updates. The arguments here aren’t substantially different than those made in the hearing over whether to keep the temporary block in place. The main difference is that the state of Texas seems to have accepted that it’s not going to get a clear victory, so they’re trying to encourage the court to keep at least some of the law in place. Which could happen – I have no idea what the odds are of that, or how much of the law we could be talking about, but this is the Fifth Circuit and they do have a long history of giving Ken Paxton what he wants. The real question is how long it takes them to hand down their opinion. CNN and TPR have more.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Fifth Circuit has its merits hearing on SB4

More on Rep. Nehls’ ethics investigation

Again, could be something, could be nothing.

Rep. Troy Nehls

U.S. Rep. Troy Nehls said he is cooperating with a House ethics committee “matter” that he says is related to his campaign finances.

After the House Ethics Committee last week acknowledged they were looking into an undisclosed issue involving Nehls, the Fort Bend County Republican quickly offered to assist them.

“My campaign has complied with every Federal Election Commission (FEC) law, and my books are open,” Nehls said.

[…]

In December 2023, the FEC flagged Nehls’ campaign report for inaccurate fundraising totals. In October, he reported raising nearly $365,000 and spending $216,000. After the FEC inquiry, he submitted an amended report in January showing he had actually raised $484,000 and spent about $314,000.

Those campaign fundraising totals have since grown to $525,274 raised and $353,000 spent, according to his latest report filed in February. He had about $588,000 in his campaign account heading into the March primary elections.

See here for the background. This is all consistent with there being a clerical error or some other readily fixable situation. It’s also possible this goes quite a bit deeper. We won’t know until we hear from the committee, which as noted will be in May. I’ll keep an eye on it.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Extending parking meter hours downtown

I’m okay with this.

Houston City Council will vote to extend the time residents will have to pay city parking meters on Wednesday.

The current ordinance requires drivers who park in metered spots to pay between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday. The new ordinance would keep the start time at 7 a.m., but extend the period people will have to pay to 2 a.m.

The new change will not increase parking rates, if passed, but is expected to generate more revenue for the city, said Council Member Edward Pollard, who introduced the agenda item with Council Members Fred Flickinger and Tiffany Thomas.

“This is a way in which we can trickle on small amounts that will add up over time,” Pollard said.

City ordinance requires ParkHouston, which oversees parking meters in Houston, to keep a $2 million fund balance. Any revenue made that exceeds the fund balance goes into the city’s general fund, said Billy Rudolph, chief of staff of the city’s Administrative and Regulatory Affairs Department.

Before the pandemic, the city received approximately $10 million in ParkHouston revenue for the general fund, Rudolph said. Last year, the city received approximately $5 million.

Pollard believes that cash amount could double with the extension.

“The administration says that we’re broke,” Pollard said. “I don’t necessarily believe that, but I do believe that we are going to have to find ways to bring in more revenue.”

[…]

Mayor John Whitmire did not respond directly to questions of whether he would support the proposal, but he said that a robust discussion would likely follow at City Council this week.

“In this case, three Council Members are playing an active role by introducing an idea to help bring additional revenue to the city,” Whitmire wrote in a statement. “Such a privilege also comes with a duty to do more than present a good idea.”

Whitmire added that before this proposal could go forward, council members would have to get input from the public and weigh the potential unintended consequences of implementing the change.

While Pollard is optimistic about the potential change, business leaders who work downtown, where many of the city’s parking meters are located, are raising red flags.

Kris Larson, president and CEO of Downtown Houston, which operates as the umbrella group for the area’s development organizations, told the Chronicle he was first approached about the potential changes by the mayor’s office and Council Member Joaquin Martinez, who represents downtown – not by the three members of council who put the item on the agenda.

“What problem are we trying to solve with this change?” Larson asked. “Is this simply about revenue and trying to maximize the amount of revenue that the city can collect in the short term?”

Well, yes. That’s what it’s about. And it’s fine. Look, if you go downtown to see a show or watch an Astros game and you park on the street, you’re probably paying to park through 11 PM. If the hours in which you have to pay get extended to 2 AM, you might pay for a little extra time, like to 11:30 or midnight, but not that much more. The shows we see at the Hobby Center are usually out by 10:30 or so. Astros games start at 7 and thanks to the new rules are likely to be over by around 10. You might pad your time a bit to hedge against the risk of a ticket, but at worst it’ll cost you another two or three bucks. Most people will barely notice. I get why Downtown Houston doesn’t like this, but I think they’re blowing it way out of proportion.

And yes, we need the revenue. There are only so many options for increasing revenue, which is absolutely going to be needed to pay for the firefighter pay agreement. Hell, it was needed even before this settlement. I’m not a fan of CM Pollard, but I appreciate that he’s thinking outside the box here and putting forward some solutions, using Prop A to make sure they get heard to boot. I hope the Mayor doesn’t oppose this proposal.

UPDATE: The parking meter proposal was delayed for a week while another proposal to allow for more Council discretion in getting speed humps built in their neighborhoods was referred to a new “Proposition A” committee, which is a Mayor Whitmire creation. We’ll keep an eye on that.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Texas blog roundup for the week of April 1

It’s one, two, three strikes you’re out at the old Texas Progressive Alliance weekly roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of April 1

One more whiny election loser lawsuit

I know, we all thought we were done with these.

Nearly five months after Harris County’s November 2022 election results were upheld in court, another unsuccessful Republican judicial candidate laid out a similar set of facts before the same judge in the same downtown Houston courtroom on Monday, seeking a different outcome.

This time, the case hinges on whether the judge can be persuaded to order a new election in a race with a much narrower vote margin.

Tami Pierce, like another 20 GOP candidates for Harris County offices, filed a lawsuit challenging the results of the 2022 midterm elections, which were marred by a ballot paper shortage on election day that impaired voting at around 20 out of 782 polling locations.

Though Judge David Peeples, a visiting judge from Bexar County who has presided over the entire group of lawsuits, has previously upheld results in other races, this lawsuit for the 180th District Court seat could swing in the other direction because Pierce’s opponent, incumbent Democrat Judge DaSean Jones, defeated her by just 449 out of over 1 million votes cast.

Peeples ruled last November that while he found “many mistakes and violations of the Election Code,” there were not enough votes in doubt to justify ordering a new election in the 189th District Court race, which GOP candidate Erin Lunceford lost to Democrat Judge Tamika Craft by 2,743 votes.

Peeples upheld results in 15 cases for the same reasons, while another three candidates dropped their lawsuits before his ruling. Lunceford’s case is currently on appeal.

Pierce finally got her day in court on Monday – the last case to go before the judge despite having the closest margin. The case was separated from the others and set on a delayed track after Jones filed a motion that was meant to deter meritless lawsuits.

See here for the last update, which was the ruling in the previous batch of lawsuits. The plaintiff’s case in this one is more or less the same as before – I drafted this on Monday night but didn’t see any further updates on Tuesday – so it’s basically whether the judge thinks maybe this election could have been affected, if the same claims about “missing” votes are considered to be factual. If they are, I’ll note that loser Tami Pierce would still need to win about 58% of those missing votes in order to make up that 449-vote deficit; it’s just below 58% if we believe every one of those people would have voted in that race, and just above 58% if we assume an undervote rate of 3.5%, which is what it was for the other ballots in the 180th Civil District Court election.

Now, if you could name all 2,891 missing voters and determine where they lived and what their race and ethnicity and class and education and past voting histories were, you could imagine a pool of that size in an election that was otherwise almost uniformly Democratic that might have voted 58% or more for a Republican. But of course we can’t do that because (whoops!) the Republican plaintiffs and their lawyers and enablers were never able to find any actual voters who could credibly claim that the temporary loss of the printer at their voting location meant they were completely unable to vote at any time or any other location in Harris County. So given that, we have to ask what are the odds that a random group of 2,891 voters in Harris County would be 58% Republican. That question answers itself.

Does that make this a slam dunk for the defendant? Well no – if it were, surely the judge would have strongly entertained a motion to dismiss by now, to save us all the trouble. I don’t know what the judge will do – I thought he was a little histrionic in his original ruling, even if he got the answer correct – but this is the math. You tell me what the odds are.

Oh and by the way, while this was the closest race won by a Democrat, it wasn’t the closest race from the 2022 election. That would be the race for County Criminal Court #3, in which Democrat Porsha Brown lost to Republican Leslie Johnson by 267 votes, a bit more than half the margin in the contested Jones/Pierce race. But you haven’t ever heard of that race, because Porsha Brown didn’t file a whiny sore loser election lawsuit. She accepted the outcome of the election, as one does. Just so we’re clear about that.

UPDATE: And here’s the Chron story from day two, which reports that plaintiff Pierce is trying to get a bunch of people’s votes thrown out, which is a change in strategy from the original set of lawsuits. Still reprehensible, but at least it’s not a rerun.

Posted in Election 2022, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The judge-shopping will continue for the foreseeable future

We’re gonna have to make them stop.

The chief judge of the northern district of Texas, home to infamous Trump judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, has informed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that the district will not change its case assigning practices, in repudiation of a new anti-judge shopping policy.

“The district judges of the Northern District of Texas met on March 27, 2024, and discussed case assignment,” Chief Judge David Godbey wrote to Schumer in a letter dated March 29. “The consensus was not to make any change to our case assignment process at this time.”

It’s a brazen rejection of a recent policy change at the Judicial Conference, the policy-making body for the federal courts. Last month, the Conference announced that all cases seeking nationwide relief against a federal or state government action should go through a randomization process — necessary to stop right-wing litigants from planting anti-Biden administration cases with judges like Kacsmaryk, who gets virtually all of the cases filed in his division. His habitual granting of nationwide injunctions means that his rulings are not only nearly always a win for those litigants, but that they also block federal government action for the entire country.

Schumer wrote to the northern Texas chief soon after the Judicial Conference announced its policy change, posing a list of questions, including when the district would adopt the new policy.

In a Monday statement, the Senate majority leader called it “unfortunate” that Godbey wouldn’t end the “odious practice.”

“The Senate will consider legislative options that put an end to this misguided practice,” he added, though such efforts have lost steam before, and would almost certainly die in the Republican House.

See here for the background. There was concern at the time that there could be issues with enforcing this new process, and you can see why with this response. The question now is what can be done about it. The obvious-to-me answer is to codify this (and some other reforms about national injunctions and other matters) into the law, and include a provision that says any judge who violates these procedures is subject to sanctions up to and including removal from the bench. This can’t be left up to the impeachment process because there’s no way on God’s green earth that there will ever be a two-thirds majority to impeach a federal judge for acting like a blatant partisan. Also, too, appoint more judges that do respect the law and the fact that we live in a society. Needless to say, both of those remedies will require another Democratic triumvirate, one that does not rest on the likes of Manchin and Sinema. That ain’t gonna be easy, but it’s what we need to do. KERA has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The judge-shopping will continue for the foreseeable future

And the seas will rise

We’re so not ready for this.

Cities along the Gulf Coast are bracing for 10 to 12 inches of sea level rise by 2050, and data from a study in the journal Nature last week showed those risks will be exacerbated as urban areas sink to meet the sea.

Researchers from Virginia Tech, Brown University and other institutions mapped the impacts of sea level rise and coastal subsidence, or the sinking of land near the ocean, and found that land sinking would exacerbate sea level rise in some urban areas along the Gulf to a greater degree than other cities in the 32-municipality study.

The study projected that between 2020 and 2050, subsidence would account for about a fifth to a third of the new land below sea level in the urban areas analyzed on the Gulf Coast, compared to just over a tenth on the Atlantic coast and about 5% on the Pacific.

“As sea level rises and land subsides, the hazards associated with climate extremes (for example, hurricanes and storm surges), shoreline erosion and inundation of low-lying coastal areas grow,” the study said.

The authors identified each coastal city’s risk of storm damage using localized data on flooding and calculating how much each segment of land had been subsiding. Sinking ground is found most often in urban areas with clay-like soil where groundwater and oil extraction irreparably compact the earth.

“A lot of the coastal areas that we have around the U.S. are made up of young sediment, the latest geological materials to be deposited on land,” said Leonard Ohenhen, a coastal resilience expert at Virginia Tech and the study’s lead author. “They are easily compressible, and that… compaction leads to subsidence.”

His team’s paper also honed in on the potential costs of high tide flooding for five Texas cities: Port Arthur, Galveston, Texas City, Freeport and Corpus Christi.

The analysis found that across the five coastal Texas cities in the study, thousands more homes and tens of thousands more residents could be exposed by mid-century to flood devastation following the combination of sea level rise and sinking land.

You can read the paper here. The authors do say that we’re a lot better at disaster preparedness now, which will mitigate the overall impact, so we’ve got that going for us. Look, there is a lot being done to try to minimize the effects of climate change, and there is also a lot being done to resist those efforts. Maybe taking a few of the leaders of that wretched resistance and burying them up to their heads in the sand in places like Port Arthur and Galveston might help a bit. I’m just thinking out loud here.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on And the seas will rise

The SD15 special election is now a two candidate race

From Campos.

Rep. Jarvis Johnson

Commentary said this after the Democratic Party Primary about three and a half weeks ago:

“For what it is worth, according to the Texas Secretary of State website, Michelle Bonton, Molly Cook, State Rep. Jarvis Johnson, and Todd Litton were the only ones to file for the May 4 State Senate District 15 Special Election to fill the vacancy and serve out the rest of the term that ends on December 31 of this year. Looks like only Jarvis and Molly will be campaigning.”

I got my mail ballot for the May 4, 2024, election which includes the State Senate District 15 Special and the Harris Central Appraisal District Board of Directors races. See the featured photo. Only Molly Cook and State Rep. Jarvis Johnson are listed on the ballot for SD 15. I guess Michelle Bonton and Todd Litton had their names removed from the ballot. I think. Oh, well.

Molly Cook

I can confirm this. The SOS Candidate Lookup actually shows that five candidates had filed – the four mentioned by Campos plus Beto Cardenas, which comes as a surprise to me because he was not listed there before – but the three who aren’t Molly Cook or Jarvis Johnson all show a status of “Withdrew”. Not a big surprise that the people who know they will not be on the ballot in November have decided not to invest time and energy in the race to serve out the remainder of Mayor Whitmire’s term. It also means there won’t be a runoff for this, which I think we can all agree is a benefit.

It does leave in place the possibility that the winner of this race will not be the person getting sworn in next January. (Yes, I know, there’s a Republican on the November ballot too, but come on. He ain’t gonna win.) If we’d continued to have more than two candidates, the special election runoff would have been in June, and we would have known who the November candidate was. In that case, the person who had lost the primary runoff could have dropped out of the special election runoff and ensured uniformity of service. That it turned out this way isn’t a surprise given the elections calendar. At least either way we avoid a June runoff.

Well, we avoid a June runoff for this race. Remember that the HCAD elections will also be on May 4, and each of those three positions has more than two candidates in it. I can guarantee we will have at least one and probably all three of those races going into overtime in June. If you think this election is going to be sparsely attended, wait until the runoffs for those HCAD spots. That said, if they all boil down to a D versus R showing, we could see some actual money come in and maybe boost participation a bit. But believe me when I say, your vote in those HCAD races will count for a lot. Because so few other people will also be voting. It’s crazy, I know, but at least it’s only in May (and June) this one time.

I will have some interviews with HCAD candidates starting next week. Look for those so you can figure out who to support.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Influencer disclosures

I approve of this.

Texas’ top campaign finance watchdog gave initial approval last week to a proposal that would require social media users to disclose if they are being paid to share or create political advertisements.

The Texas Ethics Commission’s action comes just months after The Texas Tribune reported that a secretive and politically-connected company, called Influenceable LLC, paid internet influencers to defend Attorney General Ken Paxton ahead of his Senate impeachment trial.

The proposed rule could be finalized at the commission’s next meeting in June.

Commissioners did not mention Influenceable by name at their March 20 meeting. But the agency’s general counsel, James Tinley, noted that the rule change was in response to “at least one business” that paid social media users for undisclosed political messaging.

“It is not a hypothetical,” he said. “There is at least one business whose business model now is to do just that.”

In August, the Tribune reported on Influenceable’s attempts to sway public opinion ahead of the impeachment trial by paying Gen Z social media influencers — some with millions of online followers — to claim that Paxton was the victim of a witch hunt. They also flooded social media with posts that accused House Speaker Dade Phelan, a longtime Paxton foe who greenlit the House investigation, of being a drunk.

[…]

Influenceable’s tactics outraged some Republicans last summer. Rep. Tom Oliverson, R-Cypress, told the Tribune at the time that he was disgusted by the “manufactured outrage” and called for Influenceable to be investigated. Oliverson, who announced last week that he is running to be House speaker for the 2025 legislative session, also said he’d like lawmakers to address companies like Influenceable when they next meet. Since then — and amid a 2024 GOP primary that was rife with misinformation — other Republicans have also suggested reforming some of the state’s ethics and political advertising rules.

See here for some background. There’s a lot that ought to be done with campaign finance reform, much of which would certainly run afoul of SCOTUS as currently constituted. One thing that might be doable is exactly this, increasing the amount of transparency required for the money that freely and often very discreetly flows into the system. Maybe it wouldn’t do much to stop it, or to get people to see the puppetmasters when they become more visible, but it would do something. At the very least, the truly repugnant and rapacious forces behind all that cash mostly seem to not like having their names attached to any of it, so this could provide somewhat of a disincentive. I’m more than willing to try it and see. I’m a little surprised to see even this much support for this relatively modest reform, if only because like so much else it all traces back to the same handful of billionaire theocrats that run the modern Republican Party in Texas, but it’s there and I’ll take it. Now let’s see if this also translates to some action in the Lege next year. It would be nice to have at least one piece of legislation to anticipate with something other than dread and disgust.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment