Hydrogen hub Houston happens

Nice.

The Texas Gulf Coast has been selected by the Biden administration as a clean hydrogen hub, one of seven locations across the United States set to receive billions of dollars in federal funding and private investment to help develop a technology seen as critical to reducing the country’s greenhouse gas emissions.

The Gulf Coast hub, which would be centered in Houston, will receive up to $1.2 billion in federal funding and is expected to be the largest of the seven hubs in terms of clean hydrogen production. It will produce both blue hydrogen, made from natural gas with carbon emissions stored underground, and green hydrogen, made by running electricity from wind and solar farms through water — a process long used by NASA to power spaceships.

“We’re looking forward to working with our friends in Texas to show how much cost savings can be achieved by scaling the technology as much as possible,” a senior administration official said, on the condition of anonymity, as the plans were not yet public.

[…]

In March, the Department of Energy selected three Texas hydrogen proposals, including two in Houston, to submit applications for the funding.

The three included HyVelocity Hub, a group that included Exxon Mobil, the University of Texas at Austin, French gas supplier Air Liquide, California-based oil major Chevron, the nonprofit Center for Houston’s Future and GTI Energy, a research and development company based in the Chicago area; a consortium made up of the University of Houston, the Southern States Energy Board, the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Marathon Petroleum subsidiary MPLX and chemical companies INEOS and Linde; and a group led by the Port of Corpus Christi.

On Friday morning, HyVelocity announced their project had been selected and they would work to “leverage the world’s largest concentration of existing hydrogen production and end-use assets in Texas and Southwest Louisiana.”

The expectation within the administration is that clean hydrogen will allow the decarbonization of heavy industries such as cement and steel, along with long-haul trucks and cargo ships, sectors that are likely to prove difficult to power with renewable energy.

The decision follows a yearlong-plus effort by Texas politicians, business leaders and academic institutions to land one of the hubs, with hopes of developing the Gulf Coast into a center for clean hydrogen the same way it is for the refining of petroleum-based fuels.

See here for the background, here for the city’s press release, and here for more about HyVelocity Hub. Evan Mintz is forever banging the drum on Twitter for how Houston needs to be a leading force in the new energy industry as it has been in the fossil fuel industry. We have plenty of infrastructure and expertise, and frankly we need the economic engine to keep on humming so we don’t face the kind of decline many old manufacturing cities have had to deal with. This is a step in that direction.

To that end, I direct you to this interesting article about the particular vehicle that the Biden administration has chosen for this program.

The Biden administration announced on Friday that it would spend up to $7 billion to create seven new “hydrogen hubs” across the country. These hubs will house large-scale industrial facilities specializing in producing, moving, and using hydrogen, a potent gas that could play a range of roles in a climate-friendly economy. Hydrogen, which does not emit carbon pollution when burned, could decarbonize long-distance trucking, energy storage, chemical making, and heavy industry.

These hubs will, as my colleague Emily Pontecorvo writes, become important public-private laboratories for the use of clean hydrogen. They will complement tens of billions of dollars in tax credits that could soon support a clean hydrogen industry.

Although these hubs are a key part of the president’s climate strategy, they are not created by his signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act. They were funded, instead, by the bipartisan infrastructure law, which passed in December 2021.

That same legislation also spent $3.5 billion to create new direct air capture hubs, big regional facilities that will deploy technology capable of sucking carbon dioxide from the ambient air. In August, the Energy Department awarded the first of those hubs to Texas and Louisiana.

It matters that these two “hub”-based programs command some measure of bipartisan support. It signals, first, that these programs are likely to endure even if the GOP takes the White House next year. It shows, too, that Republicans in Congress — and especially in the Senate, where 19 Republicans voted for the infrastructure law — can back climate policy under some conditions. (Even if those conditions might involve having to negotiate with a Democratic president.)

It certainly helps, too, that hydrogen and direct air capture are two potentially climate-friendly industries where the fossil fuel industry could play the largest role. The chief executive of Occidental Petroleum, a fossil-fuel company that is building one of the first air-capture hubs, has even argued that carbon removal technology could allow the oil and gas industry to operate for decades to come.

But the bipartisan support for these programs reveal something else, too — a deeper change in how America’s leaders think about governing and growing the economy. Most coverage of the hubs has elided the fact that they’re called “hubs,” almost treating the word “hub” as a synonym for “big new economic thing.” But the hubs are called “hubs” for a reason; don’t snub the hubness of the hubs. The hubs are meant to do more than create new experimental industrial facilities at taxpayer expense. They are meant to seed specific industries in specific places, creating new centers of gravity that will allow new regional economies to form.

Read the rest, I had not considered this aspect of it at all. And if this is the idea, it bodes even better for Houston’s economic future.

Posted in Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Confederate statues finally removed from city’s art collection

Good riddance.

Statues of Christopher Columbus, Confederate officer Dick Dowling and an angel representing the “Spirit of the Confederacy” were officially removed from the city of Houston’s art collection Wednesday.

The statues were taken down from public display two to three years ago, but the city was still responsible for funding the upkeep of the artworks, Mayor Sylvester Turner said before a unanimous vote to remove the pieces. Wednesday’s vote represented the final step in the process to remove the art from the city’s inventory, he said. The process is called deaccessioning, and a number of museums across the country have done it in recent years to get rid of controversial artwork or in some cases to make money to buy new artwork.

The city created a task force to make recommendations about which statues to keep or take down after the 2017 violent nationalist rally in Charlottesville and national calls for the removal of Confederate monuments.

The task force recommended the removal of the Dick Dowling statue near Hermann Park and the “Spirit of the Confederacy” statue in Sam Houston park, but plans to remove the statues accelerated after the racial reckoning after the murder of George Floyd in June 2020.

The “Spirit of the Confederacy” statue was removed that month, and the Dowling statue was taken down a year later, according to the city.

A third statue was added to the list, however, after vandals painted the hands, head and neck of a Christopher Columbus sculpture red in June 2020. City officials removed the statue in Bell park that month, calling it a public safety hazard.

Two of the three statues have since been returned or donated. The statue of Columbus was given back to the artist, Joe Incrapera. The “Spirit of the Confederacy” statue was given to the Houston Museum of African American Culture, with help from the Houston Endowment.

See here for the last update that I have. The Dowling statue is still in a city warehouse, presumably until some other home can be found for it. This all seems like a fine outcome to me. These things can be somewhere else, where they can be properly contextualized. They don’t need to be in the city’s collection. All of this should have happened years ago, but better late than never.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston | Tagged , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Galveston County redistricting ruled illegal

Good news.

Commissioner Stephen Holmes

Galveston County Commissioners Court violated the Voting Rights Act when it approved a 2021 map that greatly limited voting power for Black and Latino voters in the county, a judge ruled Friday.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey V. Brown found that the map “denies Black and Latino voters the equal opportunity to participate in the political process and the opportunity to elect a representative of their choice to the commissioners court.” Brown was nominated by Donald Trump in 2019 to the U.S District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Commissoner’s court must file a revised redistricting plan by Oct. 20 to be adopted before the window to submit applications for the 2024 Galveston County Commissoner’s Court election opens on November 11. The deadline to file is December 11.

“We are thrilled with today’s decision – now, Black and Latino Galveston residents will once again have a fair shot to influence the decisions that shape their community,” Sarah Xiyi Chen, attorney for the Voting Rights Program at the Texas Civil Rights Project, said in a press release about the verdict.

[…]

Commissioner Stephen Holmes has represented Precinct 3 since 1999, which previously consisted of the county’s sole non-white voting majority – near 58 percent – and represented cities such as La Marque, Dickinson and parts of Texas City.

The newly adopted 2021 map shifted Precinct 3 to the northern border of the county and consists of predominantly white voters. Under this new map, minority voters made up less than a third of Precinct 3.

If the map were to stand, Holmes would most likely not be re-elected and Galveston Commissoner’s court would turn into a 5-0 Republican majority.

The consolidated lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Galveston branches of the NAACP and the local League of United Latin American Citizens, the U.S. Department of Justice and current and former county leadership.

This lawsuit was the first test of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 since the Supreme Court upheld it in June in regard to the redistricting of Alabama’s congressional maps. This section prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race or color.

Robert Quintero, president of the Galveston branch of LULAC, said challenging the maps was important to ensure a representative of color was able to stay on the court after the two-week trial in August.

“We would not have a representative that looked like one of us on the Commissioner’s court and had a vested interest in our community,” he said.

Quintero said his organization and other minority groups in the county weren’t given the opportunity to be included in the conversations about redistricting.

“Everybody wants inclusion unless they look like me,” he said.

Chen, the attorney for the Texas Civil Rights Project, said their hope is for a fair map to be in place before the candidate filing deadline in November.

See here for my previous entry, and here for some more information about the case. As of when I drafted this, it is not clear if the county will appeal, but I tend to assume they will. That would go to the Fifth Circuit – I believe, as this was not a Congressional redistricting case and it wasn’t handled by a three-judge panel – and we all know what that means, even with this ruling being handed down by a Trump-appointed judge. I’ll keep an eye on that. The Chron and the Trib have more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Galveston County redistricting ruled illegal

Cruise officially rolls out in Houston

The service is limited for now, but I suspect it will expand soon enough.

A driverless Cruise car sits in traffic on Austin Street in downtown Houston on Friday, Sept. 22, 2023. Photo: Jay R. Jordan/Axios

A driverless ride hailing service is launching operations Thursday in Houston, where residents in select locations can start catching autonomous rides at 9 p.m.

Cruise driverless cars will operate daily from 9 p.m.-6 a.m. in downtown, east downtown, Midtown, Montrose, Hyde Park and River Oaks, according to the company, which is a California-based subsidiary of General Motors.

“To give Houstonians a warm welcome, we’re offering $5 flat fares for all trips for a limited time,” Cruise spokeswoman Elizabeth Conway said Thursday.

Cruise’s driverless cars have driven more than 5 million miles in the U.S. and more than 1 million miles in Texas, offering select rides to Cruise employees in Houston since August.

The launch comes a few weeks after reports that the self-driving cars were causing a backup on a busy Montrose roadway triggered by malfunctioning traffic lights. In September, some of those autonomous cars caused another major traffic jam in Austin.

[…]

Cruise recalled all of its vehicles earlier this year for a software update in late March after one rear-ended a city bus in San Francisco. The crash caused no injuries and the autonomous car was traveling about 10 mph at the time, according to Cruise.

And while the service will offer quick rides, regulating those driverless vehicles could pose a challenge for city officials. A senate bill was written into law in 2017 that prohibits cities in Texas from regulating driverless vehicles.

Authority over autonomous vehicles is handled at the state level, said Jesse Bounds, director of innovation and performance in the Houston mayor’s office.

Conway said the company is in its early days of service, and the self-driving cars will pull over to the side of the road if they “don’t know what to do.”

See here for more on that Montrose incident. I’m curious why the service is so limited at this time, and also curious as to how they are defining “east downtown”. Just a guess, but the sensible answer to that is “whatever you want to call the area in between downtown and Montrose”, which might include places like Freedmen’s Town and Westmoreland, although I guess the latter is more “east Midtown”. Be that as it may, this is your chance to ride in a robotaxi for almost free. Anyone out there gonna try it? It’s on my to-do list eventually, but not till its geographic reach is a little broader. TechCrunch and InnovationMap have more.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Endorsement watch: Martinez in I, and wait, what?

The Chron made a perfectly fine endorsement.

Joaquin Martinez

It’s not easy to follow in the footsteps of outgoing Councilmember Robert Gallegos. As the lone Hispanic around the horseshoe, he has robustly represented his hometown and the most Hispanic district in Houston for nearly a decade.

Despite councilmembers’ relatively limited power, Gallegos made a name for himself on quality-of-life issues, advocating tirelessly to address stalled trains that so badly disrupt life on the End End and working to secure extra funding for garbage and recycling collection, as well as parks and green spaces.

Joaquin Martinez, 43, is best poised to pick up Gallegos’ baton. As Gallegos’ longtime staffer and director of community affairs, Martinez is more than qualified for the job. A political science graduate of University of Houston-Downtown, he spent his early career in youth programming and sharpened his community organizing skills at BakerRipley, one of Houston’s largest nonprofits. He’s also a board member of Arte Publico Press and the Tejano Center for Community Concerns.

Martinez has deep roots in District I. Growing up as one of 12 siblings in Eastwood, a historic East End neighborhood, he remembers, as a teen, craving the sort of hip coffee shops that now garner headlines such as the one in an upcycled shipping container near the Milby rail yard selling $10 THC-infused lattes few longtime residents can afford. Martinez is concerned about the skyrocketing property values, taxes and rent that are pricing out families he grew up with. His experience in Gallegos’ office has shown him repeatedly the importance of incorporating local input and empowering constituents to voice their concerns to developers, such as by securing Community Benefits Agreements. Martinez particularly wants to leverage federal and state dollars to help his renter-majority district have access to affordable, single-family homes and build generational wealth so they can stay in their neighborhood.

My interview with Joaquin Martinez is here. The Chron sings his praises at length, notes in passing that his solitary opponent is unserious and not worth considering, and strongly urges residents to vote for Martinez. All well and very good.

And then yesterday they gave us this, which, I dunno, maybe not?

Coming off a brutally hot summer in which Texas set 10 unofficial state records for electricity demand and issued nearly a dozen requests for energy conservation to keep the lights on, it would be reasonable to be a bit worried about the grid’s resiliency for the foreseeable future.

When ERCOT, the state’s grid manager, announced this month it would be seeking up to 3,000 megawatts of additional generation because there’s a 20 percent chance of a grid emergency this winter, it’s reasonable to be even more worried. That additional generation won’t come from any new power sources. ERCOT instead provided a list of mothballed natural gas and coal plants that could maybe, hopefully creak back to life to stave off disaster.

This is the new normal Texans are facing when it comes to power generation: living like we are always in a hurricane’s path, except instead of breathlessly tracking weather forecasts, we’re scanning ERCOT dashboards to see whether energy demand will outstrip supply. State legislators flailed during the legislative session over proposals to make the grid more reliable by building out many more gigawatts of generation. Fortunately, the worst ideas — such as an $18 billion plan backed by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick to build a fleet of state-owned natural gas plants — didn’t pass.

A compromise did, however, make it into state law with an accompanying constitutional amendment that voters will consider this coming election. Proposition 7 would create the Texas Energy Fund to subsidize low-interest loans for the “construction, maintenance, modernization and operation” of new power plants.

This fund, administered by the Public Utilities Commission, would set aside $7.2 billion of taxpayer money for power generators to apply for 3 percent interest loans. These loans could fund up to 60 percent of the construction for new “dispatchable generation” of at least 100 megawatts.

That term — “dispatchable” — is jargon for any power source that can be turned on or off quickly, or, according to the new law, “can be controlled primarily by forces under human control.” In other words, not wind or solar — renewable power sources that are clean, save consumers money and currently account for roughly one-third of the state’s electricity. “Electric storage facilities,” such as utility-scale batteries — which saved Texas from power outages more than once this summer by pumping megawatts into the grid when energy demand nearly exceeded supply — are also not eligible for the loans. What the backers of the energy fund really want to attract is more natural gas and coal — energy sources that pollute our air and whose emissions contribute to climate change.

There’s no way to sugarcoat it: this new law is a prime example of the state Legislature putting its thumb on the scale to tilt the energy market against renewable power, which has grown in Texas at a rapid pace. While subsidies helped get renewables going, at this point, it’s simple economics: building solar fields and wind turbines is cheap and investing in new natural gas plants is expensive.

Yet it’s also true that the rapid shift to renewables has made the state’s main grid more precarious at times. No, renewables were not to blame for the Winter Storm Uri power failure, but we still need power sources that can fill crucial periods of the day when grid conditions are tight: around sunrise in the winter months and on hot summer evenings when the sun sets and winds haven’t yet revved up.

Let’s take a second and pause to marvel at Dan Patrick pushing an $18 billion plan to “build a fleet of state-owned natural gas plants”. What’s that word for when the state owns the means of production? I’m sure it’ll come to me. I don’t care for this proposal and don’t intend to vote for it. You can read the Chron’s argument and make up your own mind. If this is the best the Lege can do to address these issues, well, it’s another reason why we need a better Lege.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

30 day 2023 campaign finance reports – Houston City Controller

Previously:
Mayor

Continuing with 30 day campaign finance reports, here they are for Houston City Controller candidates. The July reports for these candidates can be found here.


Candidate     Raised      Spent       Loan     On Hand
======================================================
Hollins      160,578    598,460          0     214,799
Martin       107,475     31,629          0     225,202
Sanchez       91,808     27,416    198,128      71,681
Nobles         8,150     98,752    112,000      69,663

As before, you can find all of the reports that I downloaded in this Google Drive folder. You can find all of the candidates in the Erik Manning spreadsheet. All hail Erik Manning.

The first thing to say is that at least in terms of money spent, One Of These Things Is Not Like The Others. Chris Hollins continues to leverage his big cash advantage from his time in the Mayor’s race. His report shows about $375K in advertising expenses. The report doesn’t specify what types of ads they were, but I’ve seen his stuff on the web and the socials, and I’ve gotten some mail from him. He can’t keep this up for too much longer, but I presume that what he spent will continue to pay for those ads at least through Election Day.

Two caveats about Hollins, at least at this juncture of the campaign. One is that he also spent a bunch of money on consulting fees, wages and salaries, and office rental/overhead. I didn’t bother to add it up, but that $375K for advertising leaves over $220K for other expenses, and it was clear at the glance I did take that those three items were the large majority of it. That’s all well and good, he’s got a full campaign and all, but those costs do add up, and now that his cash cushion is gone, this might constrain him a bit in a runoff. He no longer has a cash advantage over Martin, or Sanchez depending on how much of that loan is current. He can still raise more cash for the runoff, if he needs to, but people don’t write the big checks for Controller candidates like they do for Mayors.

I didn’t take a closer look at Dave Martin or Orlando Sanchez’s reports because at least in terms of expenditures, there’s nothing to say. Sanchez can plausibly claim a certain level of name recognition, but that’s not really so for Martin, even as a ten-year Council member. I know the temptation is to save something for overtime, but you have to get there first.

Shannan Nobles did spend a bit on advertising, about $65K in total. Of that, about $3K was for yard signs and radio and magazine ads. The rest was for billboards – I know I see one near my house, on I-45 near I-10. You could buy a lot of time on cable TV for that kind of money, that’s all I’m going to say.

I’m working on the Council candidates next. Let me know what you think.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 30 day 2023 campaign finance reports – Houston City Controller

Do unto public schools as you would not do to charter schools

Infuriating, but hardly surprising.

In June, Texas Commissioner of Education Mike Morath embarked on the largest school takeover in recent history, firing the governing board and the superintendent of the Houston Independent School District after one of its more than 270 schools failed to meet state educational standards for seven consecutive years.

Though the state gave Houston’s Wheatley High School a passing score the last time it assigned ratings, Morath charged ahead, saying he had an obligation under the law to either close the campus or replace the board. He chose the latter.

Drastic intervention was required at Houston ISD not just because of chronic low performance, he said, but because of the state’s continued appointment of a conservator, a person who acts as a manager for troubled districts, to ensure academic improvements.

When it comes to charter school networks that don’t meet academic standards, however, Morath has been more generous.

Since taking office more than seven years ago, Morath has repeatedly given charters permission to expand, allowing them to serve thousands more students, even when they haven’t met academic performance requirements. On at least 17 occasions, Morath has waived expansion requirements for charter networks that had too many failing campuses to qualify, according to a ProPublica and Texas Tribune analysis of state records. The state’s top education official also has approved five other waivers in cases where the charter had a combination of failing schools and campuses that were not rated because they either only served high-risk populations or had students too young to be tested.

Only three such performance waivers had been granted prior to Morath, who declined numerous requests for comment. They had all come from his immediate predecessor, according to the Texas Education Agency.

One campus that opened because of a waiver from Morath is Eastex-Jensen Neighborhood School, which is just 6 miles north of Wheatley High School. Opened in 2019, Eastex didn’t receive grades for its first two years because the state paused all school ratings due to the adverse impacts of the pandemic. In 2022, the last time the state scored schools, Eastex received a 48 out of 100, which is considered failing under the state’s accountability system. The state, however, spared campuses that received low grades from being penalized for poor performance that year.

“The hypocrisy here seems overwhelming,” said Kevin Welner, an education policy professor at the University of Colorado Boulder. “This is the same education commissioner who justified taking over the entire Houston school district based largely on one school’s old academic ratings.”

There’s a lot more, so go read the rest. I don’t have the energy for a deep dive. It mostly doesn’t require one anyway, as we all know what the root cause is (Republican control of state government) and what the fix is (Democrats winning more elections). That’s what most of these situations boil down to. I don’t know what else to say.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Do unto public schools as you would not do to charter schools

Todd Litton announces for SD15

From the inbox:

Todd Litton

I hope this message finds you and yours well. After some inspiring conversations in and across our community, and a lot of consideration with Jennifer and our family, I am thrilled to share with you that I am running to serve our community and our great state in the Texas Senate (Senate District 15) in 2024.

I’m running to serve in the Texas Senate because I believe in a future Texas that is big enough for everyone. I believe in a Texas that mirrors our community in Harris County—one that includes people from diverse backgrounds and cultures working side-by-side to build a better future for themselves, their families, and our state as a whole. And I believe it has never been more important than right now to take what we do and how we do it here, in Harris County, up to Austin to change Texas.

It is not too late, but we need to act now.

The most recent legislative session and the Senate’s trial of Ken Paxton left many folks, myself included, distressed and disgusted at the direction we see Texas going.

Our leaders’ small-hearted and close-minded view of who should be able to fully live, love, learn, pray, work, compete, vote, and thrive in our state is getting in the way of passing laws that move Texas forward and benefit all Texans. They seem hell-bent on taking over and thwarting Harris County and dismantling our state’s public education system. Determined to deny access to healthcare for well over one million Texans, they insist on restricting, even outlawing, reproductive care for millions of women across our state. This, despite the fact that Texas ranks last in the nation in maternal mortality. We simply must do better for the health, education, and well-being of ALL Texans.

We have seen what the future of Texas looks like, right here in Harris County and in Houston—the most diverse and vibrant city in the country. It’s far from something to fear or hate. It’s amazing. Using our community’s collective common sense and our shared common decency, I know we can change Texas for the better.

And if we change Texas, then we will change so much more.

Litton ran for CD02 in 2018 and lost to Dan Crenshaw by seven points; no subsequent candidate has come as close, though of course the district was made a lot redder in the 2021 redistricting. As of when I drafted this yesterday evening, his 2018 Congressional campaign website is still up. I presume either that will be updated or there will be a new URL.

I like Todd. I think he’d make a fine Senator, just like he’d have made a fine member of Congress. There are two other candidates already in this race, Molly Cook and Karthik Soora, both of whom would also make fine Senators. That means that the people of SD15 will have a difficult choice next March, and that’s before we consider the possibility that the incumbent, Sen. John Whitmire, might end up running again. There is also the possibility, as we have discussed before, that there will be a special election in SD15, to complete Sen. Whitmire’s term if he is elected Mayor, in addition to the primary. What I’m saying is that I’m going to be a busy boy with the interviews in December and January.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Todd Litton announces for SD15

30 day 2023 campaign finance reports – Houston Mayor

We are now less than a month out from Election Day, and that means it’s time for 30 day campaign finance reports, which give a decent picture of where campaigns are now, and may be the best way of understanding where the late entrants to campaigns are. As before, given the sheer number of people running for office in Houston, I will break these up into a series of posts, starting with the Mayoral candidates. July reports for this group are here. More will be to come shortly.


Candidate     Raised      Spent       Loan     On Hand
======================================================
Whitmire   1,092,518  3,924,144          0   6,876,948
JacksonLee   630,518    756,621          0     901,824
Kaplan       465,180    177,578    200,000   1,164,527
G Garcia     277,911  1,630,800          0   1,542,929
Khan          46,002     92,115     98,450     162,304
A Garcia      16,185      2,204  1,519,000       3,599
Gallegos      11,450     16,607          0     145,075
Christie       8,420    121,528    214,875     109,567
Houjami        1,988      1,372          0         616
Mbala          1,220      1,411          0         119
Williams     300,027          0          0     300,027

As before, you can find all of the reports that I downloaded in this Google Drive folder. You can find all of the candidates in the Erik Manning spreadsheet; Erik Manning is the shining star around which my campaign coverage revolves and I thank him as always for putting this together so I don’t have to.

My commentary, in the order of the reports that I downloaded and reviewed:

MJ Khan reclassified his $85K loan from the July report as an in-kind donation, which is something I have not seen done before. I’m honestly not sure how that works, but my interpretation is either that this should now be a contribution to himself, or if the intent is still to pay it back that the “outstanding loan” total should be increased accordingly. It’s money, so it sure isn’t “in kind”, that much I know. Some of that new tranche of loans is from himself, which is often how these things go, but the largest piece of it is $65K from Wallis State Bank borrowed at 13% (!!!) interest. Self-loans, in my experience, tend to not get paid back. This one I suspect will be, and may I just say “ouch”.

Yes, Robin Williams lists $300,027 in contributions, with no expenditures. His Subtotals page is blank and he did not include any documentation of individual donations. This is after he late-filed a July report that claimed $33,965 raised, again with no expenditures and the same total on hand. Hilariously, he filed a corrected report for the 30 day that was also essentially blank – it never said what was being corrected. Man, I love that just any-damn-body can run for Mayor in this town. Be that as it may, this is my response to Mr. Williams.

Annie Garcia qualified for that Tuesday debate by taking in contributions from at least 400 people. A quick look at her report shows that many of those contributions were of $1 – there were others for $2, $5, $6, $10 and some other odd amounts. Many of those contributions were not from Houston, and many came from multiple people with the same surname and address. I understand why a debate sponsor would want to impose some conditions on candidates before allowing their participation, to weed out the fringe types, and I approve of the concept. But if it can be gamed this easily, you need to put more thought into what those conditions are and what they might incentivize. As for that mind-boggling loan, it came from herself. I have to assume we’re going to start seeing some TV ads, because otherwise what was the point? I note that some candidates, such as MJ Khan and Jack Christie, appear to include loan amounts when they calculate their cash on hand, while Garcia did not. I am not clear on what the rule is here, but I think Garcia has it right.

Jack Christie loaned himself the $214K in four separate transactions, the first three (for $1K, $13K, and $100K) within a week in August, then the last one (for $100K) in early September. I presume there was a reason for doing it that way, I just don’t see any obvious reason for it.

Gilbert Garcia listed his cumulative totals on the coversheet, which is not how you’re supposed to do it. You’re supposed to just list the amount you collected and spent in the specified reporting period. He did give those numbers on the Subtotals page, and those are what I show above. As was the case with the July report, the vast majority of the amount he raised came from himself – $250K in cash and another $7,547 in in-kind contributions. Those included $5K from his law firm for office space and a bunch of smaller items attributed to himself for things like “food for campaign event” and Uber rides. The former is a normal example of an in-kind contribution – essentially, a donation of goods or services, with a cash equivalent listed for the value – but the latter I believe should have been classified as “political expenditures made from personal funds”. Not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things, but this makes me once again renew my call for the software for these reports to have data validation and error-checking in it, so that we can avoid some of these often simple and/or dumb mistakes.

Lee Kaplan continues to be a strong fundraiser for reasons that continue to elude me. The vast majority of his finance report, like literally pages 240 through 709, are all expenditures mostly in the $8 to $40 range for “Fees” to an outfit in Baton Rouge called Anedot, which is an online giving processor. I will say once again, I’ve never seen anything quite like this. He then has some more normal items like office space and consulting fees, which amounted to about $80K to Slingshot Strategies from Atlanta. I assume at some point he will spend a few bucks on, like, advertising? You know, to maybe get his name recognition into double digits? Just a thought.

One candidate who has done a lot of advertising is John Whitmire – over $2.7 million in ad expenses, at a rough count. A lot of that is for Facebook/Instagram and other online ads – Lord knows, I can’t escape Whitmire ads wherever I go on the Internet these days. He also has something I’ve not seen before in a finance report, and that’s that’s a Schedule K filing, which is “Interest, Credits, Gains, Refunds, and Contributions Returned to Filers”. What this is in real life is his account selling a bunch of stock – you didn’t think the $10 million he had on hand all these years was just cash sitting in a bank, did you? – and presumably using those funds to make a ton of commissions for ad buyers. He had stock in Microsoft, IBM, Walmart, Apple, Waste Management, Amazon, Enterprise Products, Avnet, and more. Oh, he also spent $18K or so on Anedot fees, though he mercifully listed all that as one item. My wrists thank his team for not making me scroll through an additional 500 pages.

After all this, Sheila Jackson Lee had a comfortingly boring report. Just the basics, donations in and expenditures out. She spent about $200K on ads, with most of it being online (about $150K), with $40K for cable. I’ve seen some web ads for her, such as one of her attack ads against Whitmire (including a Spanish-language ad, whose captions were easy enough to get the main idea from), but unlike Whitmire and his presence during sporting events, nothing I have seen on TV yet.

And finally, Robert Gallegos…yeah, that’s not gonna cut it. He’s a better and more qualified candidate than his fundraising would imply, but here we are. It is what it is.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Another federal complaint filed against HISD

Two and counting.

The Greater Houston Coalition of Justice has filed a complaint to the federal government alleging that Texas education authorities created a hostile workplace in Houston ISD by installing Mike Miles as superintendent and replacing the district’s elected trustees with a Board of Managers.

The complaint, filed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accuses Gov. Greg Abbott and Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath of violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.

The written complaint does not detail exactly how the state discriminated against its employees by appointing Miles and the board to lead HISD. Longtime civil rights leader Johnny Mata, who heads the coalition, said the state had created a hostile workplace by silencing teachers and threatening them with retaliation for dissent.

He also said the state “selectively enforces” which districts to take over, noting that Wheatley High School, which triggered State Rep. Harold Dutton’s law allowing the Texas Education Agency to intervene in districts where a school had failed five years in a row, had already improved its rating to a passing grade by the time the state stepped in earlier this year.

“Since the TEA takeover, parents and teachers appear to be down the river without a paddle. There’s confusion without a sense of direction, and it’s real sad because with that type of condition in the workplace, many teachers are leaving or having to work in stressful situations, which spills over to the children,” Mata said.

As the story notes, there was a complaint filed in March by the same group with the US Department of Education. That complaint is still pending. It’s not clear to me that either complaint will accomplish much, but I understand the impetus for filing them. We’ll see what happens.

Posted in Legal matters, School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Another federal complaint filed against HISD

Lauren Ashley Simmons announces for HD146

From the inbox, and also visible here.

Lauren Ashley Simmons

Lauren Ashley Simmons, a union organizer and HISD parent advocate, announced her campaign for Texas State Representative, District 146 today. Simmons will run in the Democratic primary election on March 5, 2024, against the incumbent representative, Shawn Thierry.

“Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm famously said, ‘If they don’t give you a seat at the table, bring a folding chair.’ I am running because the people of District 146 have lost our seat at the table,” said Simmons. “Our current representative has lost her way and now votes with Greg Abbott and Republicans to take away our rights, destroy our public schools, and hurt our kids.”

Simmons is a union organizer who has spent her entire adult life fighting for the people who Greg Abbott is attacking every day. She currently organizes Black low-income women and Black migrant women to get fair wages and benefits, improved working conditions, and better job security. She has been an organizer and fierce advocate for Texas state employees and Houston teachers. She is a proud CWA member and shop steward.

Simmons is the mother of two children who attend HISD schools, which were recently taken over by Abbott’s Texas Education Agency. Simmons remarks at an HISD community meeting about the TEA takeover went viral, garnering 7.6 million views.

“I am fighting to keep our public schools strong by supporting teachers, students, and parents; to get health care for people who have to choose between paying for medicine or paying the rent; and to secure living wages for the very people that Greg Abbott and the Republicans are trying to keep down,” said Simmons. “I look forward to asking the people of District 146 to give me the privilege of fighting for them in the Texas House of Representatives.”

Learn more at www.LaurenAshleySimmons.com.

Rep. Thierry went rogue on book bans and gender affirming care in the last session, and I’m more than happy to see her draw a serious challenger. It’s a shame because she’s done some good work in the past, but you support laws that hurt vulnerable people, you get called on it. I note that Grant Martin is the contact for Simmons’ campaign, so I expect she’ll raise some money and send out a lot of mail. Keep an eye on this one.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lauren Ashley Simmons announces for HD146

Texas blog roundup for the week of October 9

The Texas Progressive Alliance is enjoying the first taste of autumn as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of October 9

Interview with Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth

As you know, administration of Harris County’s elections has been reverted to the County Clerk’s office, with the Tax Assessor once again being in charge of voter registration. Putting aside the legislative intent and the litigation over this, the November election will be the first one handled by the Clerk’s office since the transition to an Elections Administrator in 2021. It’s also our second year of dealing with the effects of SB1 and mail ballots, and with the new paper-ballot-enabled voting machines, which caused more than a few problems last November. With all this and the threat of further intervention from the state, I thought this would be a good time to ask County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth about how this is going and what we voters can expect when we step up to the voting machines in a couple of weeks. Hudspeth had served as the elections chief under the previous Clerks, so she has plenty of experience and perspective, and we had a good conversation. Listen to it here:

PREVIOUSLY:
Kathy Blueford-Daniels
Dani Hernandez
Judith Cruz
Plácido Gómez
Mario Castillo
Cynthia Reyes-Revilla
Joaquin Martinez
Tarsha Jackson
Leah Wolfthal
Melanie Miles
Abbie Kamin
Sallie Alcorn
Letitia Plummer
Nick Hellyar
Obes Nwabara
Danielle Bess
Holly Vilaseca
Marina Coryat
Donnell Cooper
Twila Carter
Casey Curry
James Joseph
Mary Nan Huffman
Richard Cantu
Fair For Houston/Yes On Prop B
Lesley Briones on the Harris Health System bond referendum
Dave Martin
Chris Hollins

And that is my final planned interview for this cycle. There may be a late-breaking interview or two, but other than this I will take a little time off and then interview the Mayoral candidates for the runoff. It’s a short break from then until the rush of 2024 primary interviews, so I’m going to enjoy it. The Erik Manning spreadsheet is here. My previous posts about the 2023 HISD election are here and here. My posts about the July campaign finance reports for City Council candidates are here and here, and my post about the July campaign finance reports for Controller candidates is here.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Interview with Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth

UH-Hobby Center poll: Whitmire 34, Jackson Lee 31

Same pollster as before, nearly the same result.

There has been almost no movement in Houston’s mayoral race over the last three months, with state Sen. John Whitmire and U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee still firmly entrenched atop the crowded field, according to a new poll from the University of Houston’s Hobby School of Public Affairs.

The frontrunners’ numbers, 34% and 31% respectively, are nearly exactly where they stood in the Hobby School’s July 25 poll, with Jackson Lee slipping just one percentage point. No other candidate in the field has eclipsed 4%, and Whitmire still comfortably leads in a potential runoff against the congresswoman, 50% to 36%.

With less than two weeks to go before early voting begins Oct. 23, the poll indicates other candidates have been unable to separate themselves from the pack to directly challenge Whitmire and Jackson Lee. Even if all 22% of undecided voters joined one of the other contenders, they would still trail Whitmire and Jackson Lee.

“When you look at the name ID question, folks just don’t know these other candidates,” said Renee Cross, senior executive director of the Hobby School and an author of the poll, which asked a representative group of 800 likely Houston voters for their preferences.

“Anything is possible, but particularly with that many candidates, the clock is ticking. I think it’s going to be really difficult for anybody to push one of them out of the runoff.”

Former Metro Chair Gilbert Garcia and former councilmember Jack Christie tied at 4% in the poll, with attorney Lee Kaplan (2%), Councilmember Robert Gallegos (1%), and others lagging behind. That is mostly where they were in July, with Garcia ticking up a point and Gallegos moving down one. Christie was not included in the July poll.

Candidates will have to hit 5% to be included in the last debate of the election season on Oct. 30, hosted by the Houston Chronicle, ABC13 and Univision.

See here for the previous poll, here for the UH/Hobby Center Houston 2023 polling homepage, and here for the poll report. I don’t have much to say this time that I didn’t say last time, so go read my previous post for that commentary. The one oddball thing that caught my eye is that while this poll somehow includes the names of 14 of the 17 candidates running for Mayor, one of the candidates they didn’t mention is Annie Garcia, who managed to qualify for that Tuesday debate even as Gilbert Garcia and Robert Gallegos fell short. Maybe the poll questions didn’t list all 17 candidates, or maybe she legitimately got no mentions from any respondents. Go figure. Anyway, if this is the only poll in town, that next debate is going to be a much more concentrated affair.

Former Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins, meanwhile, has broadened his lead in the city controller’s race. The poll finds he has twice as much support as any other candidate, with 29% of voters intending to vote for him, up 5 percentage points since July. Orlando Sanchez has 14% (down 2), Mayor Pro Tem Dave Martin 8% (up 2), and Chief Deputy City Controller Shannan Nobles 4% (up 1). In that race, 45% of voters are undecided.

The poll also asked the likely Houston voters for their position on Prop A, the charter amendment that would allow any three council members to put an item on the City Council’s weekly agenda. The mayor currently controls the agenda almost entirely.

It found more than half of voters (57%) plan to support the measure, with just 12% against and 31% undecided. The other city charter amendment, Prop B, was written at a college level of reading comprehension, according to the poll’s organizers, which makes it too complex to poll. That measure would seek more proportional representation for Houston on regional planning boards.

Similarly, more than half of the electorate (59%) plans to support Harris County’s $2.5 billion bond package to build a new Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital. More residents (25%) oppose that measure, especially among Republicans.

Just a reminder, my interview with Dave Martin is here, with Chris Hollins is here, on Prop B/Fair for Houston is here, and on the Harris County hospital bond is here. I assume they had a separate sample just for that question that included non-Houston Harris County voters? If not, that result isn’t nearly as good as it looks. Houston Landing has more.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Judge Hidalgo talks about her mental health journey

Good stuff, and I’d bet there are a lot of people who need to hear it.

Judge Lina Hidalgo

Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo said she spent years fighting depression and suicidal thoughts but felt too ashamed to ask for help because of the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment.

She said she resisted the idea of seeing a psychiatrist despite experiencing these symptoms of depression for nearly a decade. Even when she finally decided to check into an inpatient mental health treatment facility this summer, she said she told a friend that she was scared it would forever be part of her resume.

“I was holding myself back, just because I was too prideful and biased to not recognize that I needed that kind of care,” Hidalgo, 32, said in a wide-ranging interview Thursday. “I don’t want that for anybody else in the community.”

Hidalgo returned to work [last] Monday for the first time since she announced Aug. 7 that she was taking an extended leave of absence to receive mental health treatment. She said in a letter to Harris County residents that she had been experiencing symptoms “for some time” but was not diagnosed with clinical depression until July.

After spending seven weeks in treatment at the Lindner Center for HOPE in Cincinnati, Hidalgo said she wishes she had sought treatment sooner.

“I was so ignorant about mental health, and now I’ve been sort of on a crash course about it,” Hidalgo said. “I recognize that there’s such a lack of knowledge in the community. I feel like if there’s a little bit that I can do by sharing my experience and it will help other people, then I have a responsibility to do that.”

[…]

While in treatment, her staff sent her letters from supporters who offered words of encouragement and sympathized with her job being stressful. But Hidalgo said Thursday that she believes she would have needed treatment regardless of her profession.

“I appreciate the sentiment and I know they mean well, but I don’t want the takeaway to be that you only are depressed or deserve treatment if you are in a ‘tough job,’” she said. “I would have driven myself to severe depression no matter what I did because my personality is this way.”

Go read the rest, and click over to watch a video of her conversation with the Chron. I greatly admire what Judge Hidalgo is doing, and I hope her message is received by everyone who needs to hear it.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Interview with Chris Hollins

Chris Hollins

We’ve had a few familiar names among the candidates for office so far, but I daresay there’s only one who qualifies as a national name. That would be Chris Hollins, who drew national plaudits for his efforts to make the November 2020 election in Harris County safe and accessible for all. This had the unfortunate effect of putting a target on Harris County for Republicans, but that’s a fight we were always going to have. Hollins, who is principal attorney for the Hollins Law Group and was a management consultant with McKinsey, has served on the Metro board and as Vice Chair for Finance for the Texas Democratic Party. I interviewed him before about his time filling in as Harris County Clerk and running the 2020 election, which you can find here. You can listen to my interview with him for this campaign here:

PREVIOUSLY:
Kathy Blueford-Daniels
Dani Hernandez
Judith Cruz
Plácido Gómez
Mario Castillo
Cynthia Reyes-Revilla
Joaquin Martinez
Tarsha Jackson
Leah Wolfthal
Melanie Miles
Abbie Kamin
Sallie Alcorn
Letitia Plummer
Nick Hellyar
Obes Nwabara
Danielle Bess
Holly Vilaseca
Marina Coryat
Donnell Cooper
Twila Carter
Casey Curry
James Joseph
Mary Nan Huffman
Richard Cantu
Fair For Houston/Yes On Prop B
Lesley Briones on the Harris Health System bond referendum
Dave Martin

That’s it for Controller candidates. I reached out to Shannan Martin but have not heard back from her; if she does get in touch with me you’ll see that interview later. I did not get in touch with Orlando Sanchez because life is short and I didn’t want to talk to him. The bonus interview will be tomorrow. I know I said it would be Mayor candidates after that, but for various reasons I have decided to wait for the runoff on that one. I’ll have more to say about that later, but for now barring any latecomers, this week will be the wrap on interviews. The Erik Manning spreadsheet is here. My previous posts about the 2023 HISD election are here and here. My posts about the July campaign finance reports for City Council candidates are here and here, and my post about the July campaign finance reports for Controller candidates is here.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Paxton to file criminal complaint against House impeachment managers

My God, this guy is a whiny loser.

A crook any way you look

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he was filing criminal complaints Monday against House impeachment managers who released documents that contained his personal address and triggered what he called threats of violence against his family.

In a statement on Monday, he said the 12 managers “clearly have a desire to threaten me with harm” by releasing the information.

The managers had posted a trove of documents last week that were not considered in the impeachment trial, in which Paxton was acquitted of all charges. They said they had been blocked from including the evidence because of time constraints and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s declining to admit certain records.

Top managers said the records were “inadvertently uploaded” at first. The following morning, they were reposted online with Paxton’s address redacted.

The impeachment managers did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.

Paxton said he would ask district attorneys in the managers’ home counties to pursue prosecution using a new state law that prohibits “doxxing,” or the publishing of private information about a person, often used as a form of cyberbullying.

Paxton is required to disclose his properties’ addresses in annual personal financial disclosure forms, but he has self-redacted them “for security purposes,” even though the law requires him to include it, as Hearst Newspapers has reported.

Certain types of Texas officials, such as law enforcement and judges, have the right to request that counties exclude their personal addresses from appraisal records, according to state law. The attorney general is not one of them.

See here for the background. The Trib adds some details.

The new legislation cited by Paxton prohibits posting an individual’s personal information such as a home address or telephone number with the intent to cause harm to that individual or their family.

Paxton said he plans to file the criminal complaints in each of the eight counties represented by the dozen impeachment managers. It is not clear which address is in question. Several of Paxton’s addresses are available through already-published public records, often found online from any location through local municipalities’ appraisal district databases.

House lawyer Rusty Hardin, who prosecuted Paxton, said Monday that the documents released last week contained the same information that was included in other documents that had already been filed or were admitted into the impeachment trial without objection.

He also said that the information about Paxton’s residence is available through public records, and has been for years. Further, he said the release of documents was not conducted with an intent to cause harm to Paxton as he alleged — it was “simply a repeat of public information to anyone that wants to look into it.”

If Paxton makes good on his pledge to file the criminal complaints, Hardin said his Houston law firm will consider countering with a criminal complaint against Paxton for making a false report to police.

“This is the exact kind of bullying, uninformed vengeful act that we predicted if the attorney general was not impeached,” Hardin said. “He’s trying to misuse the criminal justice system to cower and punish people who sought to impeach him under the law. It’s just one more outrageous, vengeful act by a man who has no business being attorney general.”

Here’s the bill’s text, which specifies that the offense must include “the intent to cause harm or a threat of harm to the individual or a member of the individual’s family or household”. The brief exposure of Paxton’s not-exactly-secret home addresses (yes, more than one) looks very much like a temporary screwup, and that is exactly what will be argued if some DA is somehow persuaded to follow through on this. Barring an email trail or a recorded statement of someone explicitly saying that they intended to cause Paxton harm, I just don’t know how you can prove that. And Ken Paxton, whose office also handles criminal prosecutions (not very well, but still), knows this. It’s a complete waste of time, it’s almost certainly going nowhere, and if there’s any intent to cause or threaten harm, it ain’t coming from the House.

Posted in Scandalized!, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Paxton to file criminal complaint against House impeachment managers

Endorsement watch: Cantu and Alcorn

Two At Large endorsements are up, beginning with Richard Cantu in the open At Large #3 race.

Richard Cantu

Perhaps it was coincidence that Richard Cantu, 54, sat in the center of the table at our screening with candidates for this race, but we found him to have the right mix of personal and professional experience while also seeming to speak to the largest groups of Houstonians.

A native Houstonian who grew up on the Northside after his parents moved here from Mexico in the late 1950s, Cantu touts 30 years of community work, whether it was serving as the director of citizens’ assistance under two mayors, Lee Brown and Bill White, serving as treasurer for the Harris County Department of Education, or heading the East Aldine Management District. While all this experience matters, what struck us most were his answers to questions about public safety. He spoke with gravitas.

Cantu lost his daughter to gun violence and has been a longtime supporter of building community contact and relationships with law enforcement. He told us he wants a police officer in every park, which may sound alarming to some. He added quickly that this officer would not be decked out in intimidating gear, but would instead present as a partner — part of a return to community policing.

“Youth should feel safe around police officers,” he said. “They should want to run towards them when they’re in danger.”

My interview with Richard Cantu is here. Other At Large #3 candidates I spoke to:

Donnell Cooper
Twila Carter
Casey Curry
James Joseph

It’s a crowded field and there are several decent choices. I have no idea who might be in the best position to make it to the runoff.

Over in At Large #5, they gave an enthusiastic and well-deserved endorsement to incumbent CM Sallie Alcorn.

CM Sallie Alcorn

In her first four-year term, Alcorn, 60, has made a difference in Houstonians’ everyday lives. She’s attacked problems including sidewalks to nowhere, stray dogs, lousy drainage, noise from bars and big trucks that park illegally on neighborhood streets. She’s been all in for improving Houston’s drainage.

Alcorn’s superpower is that she understands the complicated, boring parts of Houston city government — a valuable rarity in this term-limited era. She worked at City Hall for a decade before running for office, serving as chief of staff for three councilmembers, and as a senior staff analyst for the city flood recovery officer. Before that, she worked in Houston’s Department of Housing and Community Development.

She’s a workhorse, not a grandstander. Acronyms, thorny problems and dull meetings don’t faze her. She relishes both the tedium of picking apart the wording of proposed ordinances and the turbulence of seeking — really seeking — public input.

Houston is going to need that kind of councilmember in the next four years. As federal pandemic money dries up, a “fiscal cliff” looms for the city budget. And at the same time, too much of our city is broken. Alcorn is a champion for better drinking water infrastructure, better drainage, better streets and transportation — all of which, she’s aware, will cost money. Now more than ever, she says, the key is to ensure that the city budget matches residents’ priorities. (No. 1, in her estimation: law enforcement).

My interview with CM Alcorn is here, and as I noted yesterday, you should listen for the conversation about Fair For Houston/Yes on Prop B. Alcorn is the best current argument for keeping At Large Council seats, and you should vote for her. Her two opponents, as noted in the endorsement piece, are unserious and unworthy of consideration.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Endorsement watch: Cantu and Alcorn

Interview with CM Dave Martin

CM Dave Martin

We are entering the home stretch here as we meet the Controller candidates. Dave Martin is the term-limited incumbent Council member in District E, and he also serves as the Mayor Pro Tem, which is like being the Vice Mayor. In his time on Council, Martin has served as Chair of the Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee and Chair of the Budget and Fiscal Affairs Subcommittee on Debt Financing and Pensions, and he has been on multiple other committees. He recently retired from a long career in finance, working for Pricewaterhouse Coopers and Ernst & Young along the way. He has served as a Trustee on the Humble ISD Board, and served as Secretary/Treasurer of the Board of Directors for the Harris County Houston Sports Authority (HCHSA) where he was also Chairman of the Board Finance Committee. He can also tell you the difference between a “Controller” and a “Comptroller”, but you’ll have to listen to the interview to hear that:

PREVIOUSLY:
Kathy Blueford-Daniels
Dani Hernandez
Judith Cruz
Plácido Gómez
Mario Castillo
Cynthia Reyes-Revilla
Joaquin Martinez
Tarsha Jackson
Leah Wolfthal
Melanie Miles
Abbie Kamin
Sallie Alcorn
Letitia Plummer
Nick Hellyar
Obes Nwabara
Danielle Bess
Holly Vilaseca
Marina Coryat
Donnell Cooper
Twila Carter
Casey Curry
James Joseph
Mary Nan Huffman
Richard Cantu
Fair For Houston/Yes On Prop B
Lesley Briones on the Harris Health System bond referendum

This week is for Controller candidates plus a bonus interview. I know I said it would be Mayor candidates after that, but for various reasons I have decided to wait for the runoff on that one. I’ll have more to say about that later, but for now barring any latecomers, this week will be the wrap on interviews. The Erik Manning spreadsheet is here. My previous posts about the 2023 HISD election are here and here. My posts about the July campaign finance reports for City Council candidates are here and here, and my post about the July campaign finance reports for Controller candidates is here.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Ed Emmett opines against Prop B

He’s the first prominent local politician that I’m aware of to take this position.

Ed Emmett

Promoted by a group called Fair for Houston, the petition is seeking to have cities’ and counties’ voting strength (within organizations such as the H-GAC board of directors and Transportation Policy Council) be proportional to their populations. In theory that sounds logical, but such an approach fails to recognize the purpose of regional councils of government. It would change H-GAC from a collaborative, future oriented council of peers into a politicized feeding frenzy where the biggest players pursue their self-interests at the expense of future growth areas.

Since its formation in 1966, H-GAC has played a key role in allowing our thirteen- county region to grow in a manner that has resulted in one of the nation’s most dynamic and diverse metropolitan areas. That result came about through cooperation, not the wrangling of politics. Transportation projects, for example, are vital for regional and even statewide and national mobility and commerce. If Houston had been able to control the growth process for their own self-interest, projects in Montgomery, Fort Bend and other surrounding counties would have been delayed or even stifled, leaving residents and newcomers with fewer, less attractive alternatives for living and working.

H-GAC has no taxing authority and does not pass laws or ordinances. It has always been a forum for area governments to come together as peers and plan for the future and, in some cases, provide input to state and federal agencies. To politicize H-GAC would be a big mistake that would ultimately harm the entire region, including Houston and Harris County.

The part of H-GAC that decides which transportation projects get approved is the Transportation Policy Council. Each metropolitan area in the country is required to have a metropolitan planning organization to develop a transportation plan for the area. That is the role of the Transportation Policy Council. If Proposition B passes and H-GAC refuses to change its voting procedure, the City of Houston will be required to withdraw from the Transportation Policy Council. Proponents of Proposition B say that Houston could then form its own metropolitan planning organization, but that is not possible unless the governor agrees to such a plan. So, absent participation in the Transportation Policy Council, the City of Houston will not be eligible for most federal or state transportation improvement funds, and those funds will go to other cities around the state.

What will approval of Proposition B bring to Houston? Traffic congestion will increase for everyone. Freight transportation moving to and from Port Houston, area industries and retailers will be hampered. Interstate commerce moving through the region will be slowed or diverted. Outdated highways will be less safe and evacuation routes less efficient. Flooding of highways and adjacent neighborhoods will continue to get worse.

There’s a lot here, so let me start by saying you should listen to my interview with the campaign manager and comms manager for the Yes On Prop B campaign, which is the continuation of Fair For Houston. We discussed this question and their assertion is that existing federal law covers this situation. I Am Not A Lawyer and cannot adjudicate this conflict, but I will note that so far no professional newsgathering organization has reported that the city of Houston could face this kind of obstacle if Prop B passes and the negotiations with H-GAC fail – in their endorsement of Prop B, the Chron editorial board did not bring this point up, which suggests that either it’s not a material obstacle or they were negligent in their duties to vet the matter before offering such a judgment. I will also note that Emmett did not cite a statute or a chapter in the statutes to bolster his assertion. He may be right – as I said, I Am Not A Lawyer – but just saying this doesn’t make it so.

I would also recommend you listen to my interview with CM Sallie Alcorn, who sits on the Transportation Policy Council and is set to be the next Chair of the H-GAC Board. She says she is “agnostic” on Prop B but understands the reasons for this effort, and she talks about the collaboration and relationships with representatives from the other counties. It’s important to remember, and this is something she discusses, Prop B isn’t about imposing a new governance on H-GAC, it’s requiring the city to enter into negotiations with H-GAC about its governance, with the goal of coming to a new agreement that everyone can live with. Emmett’s op-ed takes the view that such negotiations are doomed to fail. I don’t see why that’s true. I also don’t see why the city of Houston must accept an arrangement that it believes is not fair.

While Emmett is correct that the I-45 project was a catalyst for the Fair For Houston petition drive that led to Prop B, he did not mention the other big item on the city’s list of complaints, the screw job that H-GAC gave the city in allocating $488 million in Harvey relief funds. Whatever one thinks of the I-45 project – and let’s be very clear, the city of Houston and its residents are on the pointy end of this project and it is very much our right to demand that our interests and needs be taken into consideration by TxDOT – this was an unfathomable repudiation of Houston by H-GAC, especially coming on the heels of the disrespect Houston and Harris County have gotten from the General Land Office. I don’t know how one can fail to address this in an op-ed arguing against Prop B.

Emmett’s prediction for what will happen if Prop B passes is based on the view that the required negotiations over H-GAC’s governance will fail and Houston will have to withdraw from H-GAC and this will cause chaos and a loss of federal funding. I don’t see why that has to be the case. When seeking to make a change, there’s always a risk that the change could leave you worse off than you’d have been otherwise. But that ignores the upside of taking that risk, which is that you will end up better off, and it ignores the risk that doing nothing will lead to worse outcomes in the future. I believe the current setup is not working for Houston, I believe that if we were creating H-GAC today there’s no way that Houston would agree to a governance structure that so limited its voting power, and I believe that it’s worth the effort to try to negotiate something better. I respect Ed Emmett, but I’m not moved by his argument.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ed Emmett opines against Prop B

Eric Dick is an old hand at violating campaign laws

He’s the industry standard around here.

Eric Dick

Attorney and Harris County Department of Education Trustee Eric Dick faces $40,000 in fines for campaign finance violations after the Texas Ethics Commission recently tacked on another $10,000 penalty.

The TEC ruled late last month that Dick will be required to pay the $10,000 for campaign finance violations that occurred during his unsuccessful campaign for Harris County Treasurer in March 2022. He was fined $30,000 in February 2022 for violations made during his unsuccessful 2019 run for City Council.

According to the TEC resolution signed on Sept. 29, Dick violated statutes of the Texas Election Code for failing to report two $25,000 payments to the Conservative Republicans of Texas (CRT) and the Conservative Republicans of Harris County (CRHC). There was also a discrepancy of over $100,000 reported but unaccounted-for in expenditures on his pre-election filings.

Dick’s attorney, Jared Woodfill, also president of CRT, had not returned a call as of Tuesday.

Dick also acted “in bad faith” by not responding to the complaint on time, the TEC ruled. Dick was required to submit a written letter of response to the original complaint on July 1, 2022, but he did not do so until eight months later, despite multiple attempts to try and reach him, The TEC reported.

[…]

In 2019, the Commission found Dick funded mailers from the Harris County Black Democratic News, featuring photos of prominent Black politicians on the front, including former President Barack Obama, U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, state Rep. Senfronia Thompson, state Sen. Borris Miles, and Mayor Sylvester Turner, and endorsements on the back for candidates including Dick. Miles and Thompson denounced the mailers at the time, saying they had no affiliation with the group. There was also no disclosure on the materials, required by state law to show who paid for them.

Dick also listed $125,000 he did not spend on his campaign finance reports during the 2019 election cycle. At the time, he said that he was trying to be cautious and report potential obligations for payments.

Given the severity of Dick’s combined violations and in order to “deter future violations,” the TEC decided to impose a $10,000 fine, though it could have been as high as $453,499.29, according to the resolution.

See here for more on that egregious 2019 incident. How big a screwup do you have to be to get hammered by the toothless TEC? Dick has been a rampaging scofflaw for a long time, and I almost find it reassuring that year in and year out he’s the same guy doing new variations on the same old shit. We should all have such consistency in our lives.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Weekend link dump for October 8

“Indeed, the Saudis have taken multiple steps to prop up the Russian economy since the beginning of the Ukraine war, picking up the slack created on various fronts by the imposition of Western sanctions.”

“Microsoft reportedly discussed selling Bing to Apple just a few years ago, and if the deal went through, Google would have no longer been the default search engine on iPhone.”

“The fact of this school, its very existence, seems to show Hagee and his Cornerstone congregation hedging their bets. The Rapture is imminent. We are in the Last Days and the End Times. Bible prophecy is crystal clear on that point. Or maybe not. Just in case, let’s spend $100 million fixing up the campus for our K-12 school, enroll all of our children there, and ship them off to college so that they can get good jobs and donate back to CCS as wealthy alumni who, we hope, will one day enroll their own children there as well. And their children’s children too.”

“Fans of ‘The Simpsons’ will appreciate cromulent (a synonym of acceptable or satisfactory) invented by that show to describe embiggen, another Simpsons-ism that already appears in the Merriam-Webster.com dictionary.”

“More than two dozen actors from the “Potter” films have died in the two decades since the franchise began, most recently Michael Gambon.” Quite a few on that list I didn’t know about.

RIP, Tim Wakefield, former knuckleball pitcher mostly for the Red Sox.

“If you come for the knitters, you’re going to get the needles.”

“Don’t Let Zombie Zoom Links Drag You Down”.

“The Sick, Racist Message Behind Why Trump Chose That Particular Gun Store”.

“Dianne Feinstein wasn’t always right. But she used her tenure as SSCI Chair to ensure there was a document of the torture done in our name. That legacy deserves respect.”

“Reminder to Everyone Who Forgot This Week: Kevin James’ Career Is an Embarrassment”.

Podiumgate. That’s it, that’s the link.

“A young man falsely accused of being a federal agent posing as a neo-Nazi by Elon Musk and a bunch of other right-wing trolls has launched a lawsuit against the one-time richest man in the world.” The attorney representing him is Mark Bankston of Fort Bend, who successfully sued A**x J***s.

Congratulations to Katalin Karikó for her Nobel Prize in medicine. Shame on the University of Pennsylvania for trying to claim a share of the credit for that.

“Returned Asteroid Sample Canister Contains Way More Asteroid Than Expected”.

More on Podiumgate, the most entertaining state-level scandal, non-Texas division, going on right now.

“Voter rolls are becoming the new battleground over secure elections as amateur sleuths hunt fraud”.

“The myth of Sam Bankman-Fried evaporated within moments of meeting the real deal. He was no genius, no mogul in any way that could last. I wanted to feel sorry for him, but instead I was angry that it had gotten this far.”

“Here are some questions about how the [House of Representatives] moves forward in the absence of an elected speaker, with answers from legal and congressional experts.”

“If the property value of Mar-a-Lago is so much higher than it was appraised, will you be amending the property value in line with the Trump family’s belief that the property is worth well over a billion dollars?”

RIP, Dick Butkus, Hall of Fame linebacker for the Chicago Bears.

I really hate it when people in my hometown act like giant immature assholes. Can we please get them arrested for disturbing the peace?

“Whoa—You Have GOT to Read This”

RIP, Charles Porter Jr., Houston’s first Black television reporter.

RIP, Watchers On The Wall, premier fandom site for Game of Thrones.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 3 Comments

The facts about Colony Ridge (that Greg Abbott and the other Republicans will ignore)

What the Liberty County Sheriff says:

On a Sunday evening before Labor Day, Liberty County Sheriff’s Cpl. Robert Whitesel maneuvered his patrol car through the sprawling development known as Colony Ridge, humming along to a Guns N’ Roses power ballad.

Most shifts, Whitesel will respond to the occasional burglary, theft or report of drug activity in the development that is home to tens of thousands of Latinos — many of them in the country unlawfully — about 40 miles northeast of Houston.

On this night, Whitesel handled two calls, one for someone shooting a gun in their backyard and the other to support another deputy with an unruly person. He also issued two traffic tickets and delivered a warning for a broken tail light.

“For the most part, everyone here is good people,” Whitesel said.

The comment stands in stark contrast to the portrayal of Colony Ridge that far-right websites and many of Texas’ top Republican elected officials have put forth in recent weeks, describing the area as riddled with crime, a magnet for illegal immigration and a potential hotbed for Mexican drug cartels.

Local law enforcement officials, however, offer a more nuanced view of crime and public safety in the massive, decade-old development.

In interviews, Liberty County’s Republican sheriff, Bobby Rader, and his team said the agency needs more deputies, but the county’s relatively small tax base constrains its budget. They also said violent crime occurs in Colony Ridge and cartels operate there, but those are no more prevalent than other parts of Houston and Texas.

“There are good people that live in Colony Ridge. We have deputies who reside there,” Liberty County Sheriff’s Chief Deputy Billy Knox said. “There is crime there, but you have it everywhere else. At the end of the day, our main concern is having enough people in there to be proactive and provide services to the citizens of the county.”

The local accounts are backed up, in part, by crime data reported to the state by all Texas law enforcement agencies.

The figures show the violent crime rate in areas patrolled by the Liberty County Sheriff’s Office was lower last year than in jurisdictions overseen by the Houston Police Department and sheriffs of Harris, Galveston and Chambers counties. The sheriffs of Montgomery, Fort Bend, Brazoria and Waller counties reported lower violent crime rates than Liberty County’s sheriff.

The data also show the number of violent crimes — murder, rape, robbery and assault — reported by the Liberty County Sheriff’s Office each year has remained consistent over the past decade, even as the population has boomed during that time. The agency typically investigates no more than four murders per year, though it reported 11 murders in 2020, and 10 in 2022.

See here and here for some background. One of the developers said that he believes Greg Abbott, to whom he has donated over a million dollars in total, is a “good guy” who will “know he made a mistake when the facts come out about what’s really going on here”. How’s that going so far?

On Thursday afternoon, at the invitation of the developers, brothers William “Trey” Harris and John Harris, a party of 18 politicians, staffers and representatives from the Texas attorney general’s office toured the area. Four members of the Texas House of Representatives — Baytown Republican Briscoe Cain, Houston Democrat Christina Morales, Spring Republican Valoree Swanson and Smithville Republican Stan Gerdes — participated in the tour and information session.

The kinds of houses in Colony Ridge’s six subdivisions vary from street to street, from ramshackle buildings to mobile homes to finely built, ranch-style houses with freshly mowed lawns and newly paved driveways.

Other areas in the development are minimally executed, or works-in-progress. Plywood frames and piles of building material offer hints of what future streets could be. Throughout Colony Ridge, there are few sidewalks and no road shoulders.

The lawmakers in attendance said any legislative action needs to be backed by facts on the ground, and they didn’t see anything to support the recent alarmist media reports.

“From what we’ve seen, it looks a lot like places you might see in East Texas. It looks a lot like my family’s place in Louisiana,” Cain said after the tour.

“I didn’t see anything that I found alarming,” Morales said. “It seems like a normal neighborhood.”

All 25 Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Texas delegation disagree, though.

On Saturday, they sent a letter to Abbott and Patrick saying the community holds a “staggering illegal immigrant population,” failing public safety infrastructure and “continuous drug cartel activity.” None of those members or their staffers attended Thursday’s tour.

And on Wednesday, Republican state Reps. Steve Toth, Nate Schatzline, Brian Harrison and Tony Tinderholt published a letter arguing for legislation to “clean up and clean out” the development by putting Liberty County under a conservatorship — essentially a state takeover of the county government.

[…]

Developer Trey Harris said he hopes Thursday’s tour has eased apprehensions, but is willing to travel to Austin to speak further with legislators.

“The vast majority of what you have heard is incorrect or false information,” he told the Landing Tuesday.

The developers, who have contributed over $1.4 million to Abbott since 2018, said they have not been contacted by the governor or his office, Harris said. “I would like to think that our elected officials would work a little harder digging in and finding facts before they make decisions,” he added. “I’m disappointed they didn’t.”

Looks like you have your work cut out for you there, Trey. Maybe all that money spent on Abbott wasn’t such a great investment.

Local officials say they are caught in a tough spot.

The county’s ability to regulate Colony Ridge is limited, County Judge Jay Knight said. He added that the Harris brothers have not violated any local, state or federal laws he is aware of, but the county’s hands are tied.

“Development rules in Texas favor developers,” he said. “They have a huge lobby, and they don’t want the cradle to be upset.”

Knight has been county judge for four years, but said that when Colony Ridge was first under construction in 2011, basic infrastructure was inadequate — drawing comparisons to the colonia communities along the Mexican border — and developers moved too fast.

The county has little oversight of development in the unincorporated area, Knight said. Water and sewer are independently supplied to the development. And there is a two-year holding period during which Colony Ridge is responsible for road upkeep before the county can take over maintenance. Knight said he has worked with the Harris brothers to secure adequate detention and water fencing ponds after the development cleared the trees, but that he can’t do much more.

Colony Ridge is desperate for resources, Knight said. Whether that’s supplying the community with recreational spaces, addressing environmental concerns, crime or the rising school district population.

“You can’t change momentum,” he said. “You can’t control, but you can manage through negotiation, education.”

By far, the funniest outcome of this little drama would be a crackdown on what developers like the Harris brothers can do in unincorporated county areas. I can already hear the cheers from the sustainable growth community. I feel bad for the residents of Colony Ridge, who don’t deserve any of this vitriol. The rest is a Republican-on-Republican problem – I for one would pay good money to see the likes of Briscoe Cain and Valoree Swanson try to convince even-bigger-idiot Steve Toth about the “facts” of Colony Ridge – and I am here for it. The Chron has more.

Posted in La Migra, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

HISD releases its special education plan

We’ll see.

Houston ISD’s administration rolled out a long-anticipated list of fixes to its special education programs Thursday, unveiling plans aimed at rectifying the district’s persistent problems with serving students with disabilities.

In a presentation to HISD’s state-appointed school board, Superintendent Mike Miles said the district plans to improve disability evaluation processes, bolster parent engagement and reduce achievement gaps between students receiving special education services and their peers. The steps are outlined in a new Special Education Action Plan.

HISD expects to reach those goals by training more employees on identifying and serving students with disabilities, including general education teachers, principals and office staff. Only special education employees completed the training in previous years, said Stacy Venson, HISD’s deputy chief of special education.

The district also released documents this week showing 20 percent of principals’ annual evaluation — which is linked to school leader merit pay — will be tied to special education metrics. At the high school level, principals who earn top evaluation marks stand to make $65,000 more annually than principals who receive the lowest ratings, according to a draft plan.

And in coming weeks, HISD will consider boosting special educator pay next school year under the new plan to attract and retain top talent.

Miles said the process will likely take time, given the state of HISD’s special education department. The district has struggled for more than a decade with well-documented special education problems, and it remains off-track on several key improvement targets, according to records obtained by the Houston Landing in September.

“There’s no magic pill,” Miles said. “This is a big ship that we’re going to have to turn. It’s going to take more than a year to do that. But we have the (special education) department in good hands and things are already moving in the right direction.”

See here, here, and here for some background. The Chron adds some details.

But already this year, more than three dozen schools lack access to a speech therapist as the number of students needing those services has increased, said Stacy Venson, deputy chief of special education for HISD. The district eliminated nearly two dozen contracted school psychologists and educational diagnosticians ahead of the school year, but Venson denied that any speech language pathologists were cut.

The district is working to recruit people for the speech positions, including private contractors, although the professionals are in high demand due to a nationwide shortage. HISD plans to review the surrounding districts and revise its compensation plan accordingly to attract and retain those specialists. In the meantime, the district is expanding teletherapy services and offering compensatory speech sessions after school and on the weekend to address the existing gap in staffing, Venson said.

“We’re in Houston, where they can work in the medical field and make a different type of salary than they would in public education,” she said. “That’s also a challenge in this area.”

[…]

Not everyone was impressed with the slideshow presentation or the three-page plan.

“It was not as robust as I thought,” said Jane Friou, who leads the Houston Special Education Parents Association. “I do not feel like that is going to improve anything for my kid.”

Veronica Cohetero has three children receiving special education services in HISD schools. She was happy at first when she heard the new superintendent stress the importance of challenging all students in the classroom. But the supportive, glowing picture that Miles has described is far from the reality that she witnesses on campus, she said.

“I really wish what they are painting is what was actually happening,” she said.

[…]

Some parents and advocates have raised concerns that special education students may not receive the accommodations outlined in their Individualized Education Program due to a highly specific and apparently rigid instructional model introduced by Miles that is based on high-engagement, fast pacing and grade-level content.

But the superintendent denied the allegation Thursday night when board member Angela Lemond Flowers posed the question, calling those concerns the “elephant in the room.”

“The SPED students are getting the services that are outlined on their IEPs,” Miles said. “If that IEP says more time, then you’re going to see kids with more time. If it says we’re going to have one-on-one instruction or audible instruction, then you’re going to see that.”

I’m not qualified to say whether this is a good plan or not. For sure, HISD has long fallen short of delivering special education services to its students, and to whatever extent Miles and crew can improve that, I hope they succeed. I’m just not willing to take his word on anything at this point, and this exchange above is an illustration of why. Every time anything critical is said about Mike Miles or his plans for HISD, his first response is to deny, and he usually follows that up with a claim that his critics are misinformed, often adding that they are spreading falsehoods. I’ve yet to see him acknowledge that there’s merit to anything a critic has to say. What he’s doing may work, and I hope it does, but I’m not buying what he’s selling. He hasn’t come close to earning that.

And as noted in that other story, special education is a statewide challenge.

As a former school board member and sitting member of the Texas House Public Education Committee, state Rep. Gina Hinojosa thought she could easily figure out how to get her son enrolled in special education.

School districts are required by law to conduct detailed evaluations for students suspected of having a disability within 45 days, at no cost to families. But after more than a year of waiting for her son’s dyslexia to be evaluated, Hinojosa was so frustrated she ended up paying about $2,000 for a private professional to do it.

At one point, she called Austin ISD’s central administrative office to ask about the delay.

“The problem is all over the state,” the administrator responded. “Nobody has enough people to do the evaluations.”

It’s a long story, so read the rest. This obviously adds to HISD’s challenge, and if one is inclined to cut them some slack this would be a decent reason for it. This probably needs a federal solution to alleviate it, but that’s obviously not in the cards right now.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on HISD releases its special education plan

The IAH renewable project

I like this.

Fresh off inking a new lease with the developers of a planned solar farm in Sunnyside, Houston officials hope to produce clean, reliable power on the grounds of the George Bush Intercontinental Airport.

Airport officials are asking for proposals involving solar, wind or other clean technologies that can generate 50 megawatts of power – enough for about 10,000 homes on a hot summer day. In its request for ideas, the Houston Airport System highlighted the hundreds of acres of forested green space to the east of John F. Kennedy Boulevard as it approaches the airport.

The project also could involve solar panels hoisted above parking garages and terminals. While plans are at an early stage, officials say they are excited about joining the ranks of airports worldwide with green power facilities.

“You’ve got a lot of different options out there. You’ve got solar, you’ve got wind, you’ve got hydrogen, you’ve got battery power,” Jim Szczesniak, the airport’s chief operating officer, said Wednesday. “We wanted to get this (request for information) out to be able to survey the industry.”

Officials are asking interested companies to put forth proposals for powering Bush airport by Aug. 31. They officially are agnostic about the type of technology that should be used. But they do have a few guidelines: The selected project must start by producing 50 megawatts of electricity with plans to grow to 100 megawatts.

Over the next seven years, terminal renovations and expansions, electric rental cars and, potentially, electric airplanes will lead to growing demand on the airport grid, officials say.

“We’re trying to make sure that it’s scalable, because of the fact that we know there’s growth coming forward,” Szczesniak said.

[…]

Szczesniak said the next step after the initial call for ideas will be to put out a more formal request for bids. It is possible the airport pursues multiple projects with different technologies, he said.

If Houston settles on solar, it would join many other airports. As of 2020, about 20 percent of public airports had adopted solar power over the past decade, according to a study from the University of Colorado Denver. There already is a solar canopy atop the red garage at the William P. Hobby Airport that is slated to generate 1 megawatt of power.

See here and here for more on the Sunnyside solar farm. Honestly, I think the city and Harris County should be aggressively pursuing this kind of development anywhere it might make sense. It’s a good investment, it’s a hedge against grid failures, and it will help fight climate change. A win all around. There’s a lot more to the story, which is from a few weeks ago and had been sitting in my drafts, so go read the rest.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Book-Loving Texans’ Guide To The November 2023 Election

Make note of this.

Please check out and share the newest edition of the Book-Loving Texan’s Guides to Texas School Board Elections. You can use it to inform voters and to decide where to allocate your time and donations for these very important races.

There are not a ton of school board elections in Texas this November, but that doesn’t mean this is an off cycle. Three districts in particular will both set the table for 2024’s much more busy election season and shape the school systems where hundreds of thousands of Texas students learn: Cy-Fair ISD, Granbury ISD, and Houston ISD.

I’ll have previews, profiles, and updates from the guide in the coming weeks but, in keeping with Anger & Clarity tradition, for now I’ll give you a few highlights from the doc.

I highlighted the Guide for May, with an extra focus on Katy ISD, so go back and review those posts before you read the actual guide for November. The rest of the linked post includes highlights from three elections, one of which is in HISD where author Franklin Strong singles out District III challenger Fe Bencosme as bad news. Bencosme is opposing incumbent Dani Hernandez, whose interview you can listen to here. Point being, make sure everyone you know who lives in HISD District III knows to vote for Dani Hernandez. There’s a bunch of bad candidates in Cy-Fair ISD as well, one of which is mentioned in the blog post. Read the post, read the guide (which will be updated as we go), and spread the word.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Book-Loving Texans’ Guide To The November 2023 Election

Wait, there’s another Republican in trouble?

It’s been an eventful year.

Rep. Frederick Frazier

As state lawmakers prepare for the third special session of 2023, the protracted year of lawmaking is having the unintended effect of delaying a House member’s criminal trial.

Rep. Frederick Frazier, R-McKinney, was indicted over a year ago on two charges of impersonating a public servant, which is a third-degree felony. But the case has not gone to trial yet, partly because Frazier has applied for legislative continuances, which allow lawmakers to pause cases they are involved in until the Legislature concludes its business.

The trial is currently scheduled to begin Nov. 6. But with Gov. Greg Abbott planning to call a third special session that starts Oct. 9, Frazier is expected to seek another continuance, which would delay the trial until even later in the year.

Frazier’s lawyers recently sought to postpone the trial until March 4, 2024 — a day before the Texas primary — citing their own scheduling conflicts. But a judge denied that.

Frazier announced he’s running for reelection in late July, and he has not drawn any opposition yet.

The allegations date back to the 2022 primary, when Frazier, a Dallas police officer, was running for an open seat in House District 61, which includes parts of McKinney and Frisco, with the backing of big-name Republicans including former President Donald Trump. The indictment accuses Frazier of impersonating a McKinney city code enforcement employee on two occasions to instruct people to “remove campaign signage.”

Frazier’s runoff opponent, Paul Chabot, alleged it was his signs who were targeted.

Frazier easily won the runoff, but a Collin County grand jury indicted him on the charges about a month later. Dallas police placed Frazier on administrative leave, and its Internal Affairs division has been investigating him. That investigation remains ongoing, according to a department spokesperson, Kristin Lowman.

[…]

The Collin County district attorney’s office recused itself from the case, and a special prosecutor, Will Ramsay, has been handling it. Ramsay, the 8th Judicial District Attorney, has not responded to multiple messages seeking information about the case.

While the Nov. 6 trial is likely to get delayed, court records show a flurry of activity by the state since the case resumed late this summer. Nearly two dozens subpoenas have been returned as of Monday.

The case has a visiting judge, Jim Pruitt, who is a Rockwall attorney, former mayor of the city and former Dallas County criminal court judge. Pruitt said he set the Nov. 6 trial date on Aug. 7.

“The case is still set for trial November 6,” Pruitt wrote in an email. “If the Governor calls a special session, it may impact that trial date.”

Ginger mentioned this on Friday. Gotta admit, I missed the original story. This looks to me like a sign stealing situation taken to a bit of an extreme. I don’t know how much it will resonate with the public, though in the end if he gets convicted of a felony that’s never a great look. For what it’s worth, HD61 was a 53-45 Trump district in 2020, and Frazier won it with 58% in 2022. He’d be a favorite in 2024, all things being equal, but it should be competitive and this has the potential to weigh against him if he’s convicted, or possibly give him a boost if he gets off. Or, given the bizarro-world up-is-down nature of Republicanism these days, getting convicted might give him a boost. Who can even say anymore? Anyway, this will be worth keeping an eye on.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Where the abortions are happening now

Fascinating.

A new report reveals the reality of the United States post-Dobbs: abortion deserts, especially concentrated in the southeast, forcing women to flee to nearby states that provide care.

“The Monthly Abortion Provision Study shows that many states that are in close proximity to states that banned abortion saw much sharper increases in monthly abortion numbers than would likely be explained by a continuation of earlier trends,” read the report from the Guttmacher Institute, considered the gold standard in abortion research. “Much of the increase is likely attributable to out-of-state patients who were forced to travel for abortion care, reflecting the reality that states that ban abortion are neglecting the health care needs of their residents.”

The researchers compared the data with that from 2020, the year of their last annual provider survey, when abortions were starting to tick up mostly without the burden of comprehensive gestational bans (though also amid a global pandemic). The report is based on a survey of clinics and providers, and uses a statistical model to create abortion estimates from that data plus historical data on the caseload of every provider in the country.

The overall uptick in abortions so far in 2023 likely reflects the reaction of blue states to abortion bans, along with their proximity to states under restrictive regimes. Abortions in Colorado, Illinois, Washington and New Mexico have risen significantly — all places where Democratic-led state governments have expanded access to abortion and bolstered accompanying protections.

But in a state like Texas, where abortion is now virtually illegal, there were just 14 reported abortions in the first three months of 2023 compared with a monthly average of 4,800 abortions in 2020, per the report. It highlights the huge numbers of women who have been displaced, forced to travel vast geographic distances to clinics often already overwhelmed with increased need.

[…]

As the report points out, the overall uptick in abortions doesn’t reflect improving conditions for women’s health care. Some women have been forced to carry unwanted or unviable pregnancies to term. Abortion bans inevitably hurt the most vulnerable women — young women, women of color, LGBTQ women, hourly workers, women who can’t easily take time off work and pay for travel, lodging and meals — the most.

“These findings indicate that all aspects of the abortion infrastructure — including facilities, funds and support networks — require sustained support to serve increased patient caseloads,” the report read.

The report does not speak to “self-managed abortions,” where women obtain abortion drugs — usually misoprostol and mifepristone — outside the formal health care system.

You can read the report here. One statistic of interest for you:

A small number of people in ban states may have been able to access abortion care under the limited exceptions; for example, there were 14 abortions reported in Texas the first three months of 2023, compared with an average of more than 4,800 per month in 2020. Such exceptions leave most pregnant people unable to get the abortion they need, and some people have been forced to carry their pregnancy to term.

Sobering stuff. The report also mentions the threats to interstate travel and the shifting landscape as some other states manage to pass new abortion restrictions. Read it and see for yourself. Axios and Yahoo News have more.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Where the abortions are happening now

It’s special session time again

Break’s over, y’all. Back on your heads.

Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday released his agenda for the third legislative special session of the year, asking lawmakers to pass “school choice” and further crack down on illegal immigration. The special session starts at 1 p.m. Monday.

Abbott also asked lawmakers to outlaw COVID-19 vaccine mandates by private employers.

“I am bringing the Texas Legislature back for Special Session #3 to continue building on the achievements we accomplished during the 88th Regular Legislative Session and two special sessions this summer,” Abbott said in a statement.

The special session has long been expected, but it comes at a tense time in Texas politics. Last month, the state Senate acquitted Attorney General Ken Paxton in his impeachment trial, ratcheting up tensions with the House that overwhelmingly voted to impeach him in May. And the special session starts about a month before candidate filing begins for the March primary, heightening implications for members’ reelection prospects.

Abbott has been pushing all year for legislation that would allow parents to use taxpayer funds to take their children out of public schools and put them in private or charter schools. He prioritized it during the regular session, but it did not advance out of the House, where Democrats and rural Republicans have long resisted it.

Abbott’s agenda specifically calls for “education savings accounts for all Texas schoolchildren,” or taxpayer-funded accounts that parents could use to subsidize alternative education costs.

“Together, we will chart a brighter future for all Texas children by empowering parents to choose the best education option for their child,” Abbott said.

Notably, Abbott’s agenda does not include any other education issues. That is despite the fact that lawmakers also failed during the regular session to deliver teacher pay raises and an increase in per-student funding earlier this year. Those proposals did not make it across the finish line after getting tied to Abbott’s push for education savings accounts.

Democrats quickly responded to Abbott’s call for education savings accounts.

“Today, there are schools in my district and all across Texas at risk of closure because the governor is holding public school funding hostage to pass his private school voucher scam,” state Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin, said in a statement. “It’s clear Greg Abbott is more interested in doing the bidding of the billionaire mega donors pushing this scam than in serving the people of Texas.”

The call also includes an item to Do Something about Colony Ridge, though what that might be is unclear. Those guys really should ask Abbott for a refund on all that money they’ve given him. Anyway, nothing good can come from this session, and the best outcome is for as little as possible to happen. I don’t have the energy or the inclination to follow it too closely. Good luck and godspeed to those who have to be there.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on It’s special session time again

Dispatches from Dallas, October 6 edition

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth, we have a giant grab bag of questions. Will a Texas Republican end up as Speaker of the House? Is Jonathan Mitchell going to get your name if you donated to a Texas abortion fund? Can Eric Johnson do electoral math? Can the city of Dallas actually follow new state laws? Is every vote at the Tarrant County Commissioners Court 3-2 along partisan lines? Can a young gun make a dent in John Wiley Price? Can a MAGAT bring down Matt Shaheen in the primary? And who at the State Fair can’t tell the difference between YOUR and YOU’RE? Answers to these questions and more in today’s post.

In addition to the usual shenanigans, I’d like to remind you all that there’s an election coming up. The notoriously socialist League of Women Voters recommended some resources that I’m passing along. Check out Vote 411 to find out what will be on your ballot; celebrate Vote Early Day on October 26, and vote if you haven’t already; and research the constitutional amendments on the ballot with this LWV playlist of videos. And check your registration, friends: the last day to register is October 10, next Tuesday.

This week’s post was brought to you by the music of Janelle Monáe, whom I will be seeing in concert on Monday.

  • Let’s start out with national news and how the Star-Telegram is reporting it. First, there’s this speculation that Roger Williams could end up Speaker of the House next week based on a mention by one of the Freedom Caucus bomb-throwers. I don’t know why they’d want that for Williams after it ended Kevin McCarthy’s career. Related, there’s a(nother, this is normal for the author) laughable editorial from one of the Star-Telegram’s regular editorial columnists about how Ted Cruz is not a villain for voting against the continuing resolution. I will agree with her that no, his vote on the continuing resolution is not why he’s a cartoon villain.
  • Meanwhile, on the subject of the near-shutdown, enjoy Dallas-area Representative Jasmine Crockett tearing some strips off her Republican colleagues at the snipe-hunt impeachment hearings in a video that’s gone viral.
  • Two Texas cases featured in the first week of the new Supreme Court term. First, the lawsuit against the CFPB filed by payday lenders was originally filed in Texas. They were probably hoping for exactly the kind of reactionary ruling they got from the Fifth Circuit that’s now before the Court. Fortunately for consumers, the Justices aren’t compelled by the lenders’ arguments about the agency’s funding (see Chris Geidner and Talking Points Memo for more). Second, in some very bad news, the Court denied Robert Roberson’s request for a new trial. He was convicted in 2002 of shaking his baby daughter to death based on junk science. With the Supreme Court’s denial, all that stands between Roberson and the death chamber is the possibility of clemency from Greg Abbott.
  • Jonathan Mitchell, the author of SB8, would like to know who all donated to abortion funds as part of a federal suit filed to prevent enforcement of the law. The Guardian and Jezebel have the details for you. The short version is that Mitchell is asking for this information to scare the funds and donors (I’m one!) and to possibly provide information for private enforcement suits for counties who pass the “abortion trafficking” laws that are the next stage in stripping women’s rights in Texas. I went to grad school and wrote my thesis on medieval legal history, and I find the private bounty laws like SB8 bizarre and appalling. The whole point of centralizing law enforcement in the state apparatus is to prevent private bounties and grudges. Of course, the party that has loudly told us that government is the problem for forty years doesn’t care about undermining its basic functions, as we’ve seen in the House this week.
  • Here’s an nasty little case out of Collin County that involves one of our state representatives. When Rep. Frederick Frazier ran in 2002, he was a Dallas cop and allegedly impersonated a (different) public official to get his primary opponent’s signs removed from various places. He’s been using legislative continuances to put off his trial for more than a year after trying and failing to get the trial pushed back to next March, just before the primary. It will surprise regular readers not at all to know Frazier is a MAGA candidate.
  • Speaking of our friends at the statehouse, you may remember that they accidentally included Dallas in a “get all your food trucks permitted at the county level” law. Although Dallas County was supposed to be in charge of food truck permits as of October 1, the city of Dallas is still requiring city permits.
  • Another law that’s not getting followed properly is, of course, HB3. One of its many provisions is that there have to be armed peace officers at every school. Turns out a lot of schools in north Texas can’t find officers to hire and can’t pay the officers enough even with state help if they can find them.
  • A law that may have had its genesis in events in Dallas is now hamstringing West Dallas activists who’ve been trying to get a shingle factory out of their neighborhood for years. The law is HB 929 and until the city can modify its code to comply with HB 929, they won’t accept a case for what’s called “amortization” from the activists. D Magazine has an explainer that clarifies the situation and how it’s tied to earlier events in the city. The Observer has more details about the code change, specifically the part where the city thinks it’s too easy for residents to file to get a property declared nonconforming. The sausage-making is worth reading, but if you just want to skip to the outcome, the shingle factory says they’re leaving in 2029. With the changes to the city code, the neighbors may not be able to get rid of them any earlier.
  • Sort of related: Forth Worth neighbors have established the Fort Worth Environmental Coalition of Communities to combat environmental racism on that side of the Metroplex.
  • It’s unsurprising but dismaying to note that the Anti-Defamation League has issued a report on rising white supremacist and antisemitic hate here in Texas and that a lot of it is in the Metroplex. I see reports of flyers, graffiti, and other low-level harassment in the news here regularly and I worry about my friends in marginalized communities.
  • As you may remember, Mayor Johnson switched parties recently. The DMN editorial board would like you to know that it doesn’t matter which party Johnson belongs to as long as he’s a good mayor. Separately, the DMN dings Johnson for lying about his vote percentage in the last election: he says he got 99% of the votes and they think he only got 93%. (Here’s D Magazine on the same topic back in June.) Johnson was the only candidate on the ballot for mayor; the only official write-in candidate got 1%, and 6% of us voted for Mickey Mouse and other folks who weren’t running. Johnson apparently thinks those votes don’t count. I’m pretty sure the count everybody is working from doesn’t include undervotes. As an undervoter myself, I hoped he’d understand mine as a rebuke. I guess not! Also, the Observer has some analysis of Johnson’s switch that concludes (as I did) that he’s going to have a hard time selling himself to right-wing Republicans in a primary. The SMU professor they interviewed noted that Johnson isn’t a stirring campaigner (understatement), and that he’s probably looking for an appointed office rather than an elected position. Or maybe he’s just delusional.
  • As annoyed as local Democrats are at Johnson, at least he hasn’t been leaving them out of meetings. Compare Tarrant County Judge Tim O’Hare, who left three of the eight JPs out of a policy meeting last week. The kicker: they’re not just the Democrats, they’re also the Black JPs. While the particular issues in this case are probably resolved to the detriment of the black JPs, look for more trouble if O’Hare continues to exclude Democrats, especially Black Democrats, from policy discussions.
  • Let’s talk about next year’s elections in the Dallas area. Who’s gunning for who? Derek Anthony, a Dallas businessman, is aiming at “our man downtown”, south Dallas Commissioner John Wiley Price. Price has been on Commissioner’s Court for almost 40 years, and I personally think that seat is welded to his butt. If the young guns are coming after Price, the big guns are coming after Dade Phelan and his friends in the House. This DMN story about the GOP moves against Phelan has some details about measures in Collin County. Speaking of which, a Collin County MAGA activist named Wayne Richard is going to primary Rep. Matt Shaheen of Plano, he of book-banning fame, on the grounds that he’s not conservative enough. By the way, Shaheen just asked the Dallas City Council to investigate the recent Texas Latinx Pride event, because there were some drag performers.
  • This week Tarrant County decided not to give any of their state grant money to the local branch of Girls, Inc., as they had every year since 2007, because of the national organization’s “ideology”. The DMN story about the 3-2 partisan vote sheds more light, mentioning that one of the activists speaking against Girls, Inc. was the Chief Communications Officer of Patriot Mobile, and that another commenter complained that Girls, Inc. indoctrinated children into believing in systemic racism and Black Lives Matter, which she described as child abuse. After the county decided to put the $115,000 they had planned to give to the agency elsewhere, a local teacher put up a GoFundMe to replace that funding.
  • NBC is putting out a new podcast about Grapevine-Colleyville ISD and its struggles around queer and trans students, or, as the Dallas Observer puts it, “the Nonexistent Line Between Church, Schools and State in North Texas”. This follows up a successful previous podcast by the same team about Southlake schools and racism. In related news, a Southlake senior would like to start an anti-racism group but can’t get a faculty sponsor.
  • The Guardian tells me that there’s a Banned Books Tour travelling around the country in the wake of Banned Books Week. It’ll be in Texas in the last week of the month: Dallas on the 25th; Austin on the 26th; and Houston on the 28th.
  • DFW airport is building a sixth terminal, Terminal F. They’ve put up a video rendering of the new terminal on Facebook for interested parties.
  • The city of Dallas has to review its charter every ten years. D Magazine has an explainer. One key point is we’ll be voting on the changes in 2024, so that’s going to be a very long ballot.
  • Tarrant County is still sending inmates to a private prison in Garza County near Lubbock and has increased the number of beds until 2024. The county would like to renovate a local facility as well as repair the downtown jail so they won’t need the extra capacity. The Star-Telegram notes that as of August 1, the jail was short 235 detention officers and that the vote to extend the contract was 3-2 along partisan lines. Bonus: the money for the extended contract comes out of pandemic relief money meant for childcare and affordable housing.
  • You may recall that back in June, the city of Dallas formulated short-term rental rules that were going to keep party houses out of single-family residential zones. As expected, a group of STR owners is suing the city claiming the ordinance was unconstitutional. The Dallas Observer focuses on the party house problem; an unfortunately timed incident probably affected the vote. I’m a NIMBY on this one, in part because in Austin I did have them in my backyard, but I expect the Lege to render this case moot either in a special session or in 2025 when AirBnB or VRBO pays off enough of our legislators to keep cities from banning STRs.
  • In environmental news, Reunion Tower is going completely dark for most of the night in October to protect migratory birds. About two billion birds will be flying through Texas this month as part of the Central Migratory Flyway, and light at night causes potential fatal problems for them. Dallas and Houston are two of the three biggest bird-killer cities on the route because of light pollution. Dallasites can find our how they can help at Lights Out, DFW! and more about the migration at the BirdCast dashboard for Dallas County. If you’d like local migration alerts for your area, BirdCast also offers those and not just for Dallas. Forecasting ends in mid-November, when the bird migration should be over.
  • Not a Dallas story, but about one of my favorite little gems in Austin: The Texas Memorial Museum on the UT Campus has reopened. They’ve renamed it to the Texas Science and Natural History Museum, which reflects its exhibits better. One of my friends used to work for the museum; while it’s small, it’s worth your time. I’m so glad it’s back!
  • I previously mentioned the Bissel Pet Foundation’s Empty the Shelters National Adoption Event that’s running at Dallas Animal Services through the 15th with free adoption. I’m sad to say that right now the animal shelter is overwhelmed with animals coming in, particularly large dogs. They’re currently at about 170% capacity and really looking for folks to foster and adopt so they don’t have to resort to euthanasia. If you know someone looking for a pet in the DFW area, please send them to Animal Services.
  • Last, but not least, one more State Fair story: The State Fair’s welcome sign had a your/you’re grammatical error and it was all over the internet. Fortunately they came back with a funny video of their own, throwing human-sized mascot Little Tex under the bus. The sign has now been corrected.
Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Endorsement watch: Pollard and Castillo

Two more endorsements, beginning with District J.

CM Ed Pollard

Every city council member is defending their record on crime but only Edward Pollard represents a district with an international reputation as a hub for sex trafficking and gang violence. To win reelection, he’s got to convince his constituents he’s done everything in his power to make the district safer.

District J — which stretches from just southwest of the Galleria through Gulfton, Sharpstown and Braeburn — encompasses a remarkably diverse mosaic of communities where more than 80 languages are spoken and immigrants have arrived from every continent in pursuit of the American dream. It is also, unfortunately, a region rife with crime. The district is home to three of Houston’s top 10 most dangerous ZIP codes, according to the FBI. Gang activity is common. One area, the Bissonnet Track, had been such a notorious hub for sex trafficking that it earned an international reputation.

Given these challenges, Pollard, 36, has wisely made public safety the primary focus of his first term. He’s brought license plate readers — light pole cameras that provide 24/7 monitoring to deter and solve crimes such as burglary and theft — to his district. He’s secured grant funding for after-school programs. He tapped his discretionary funds to pay overtime hours for a community policing unit in his district that responds to lower-level crimes — such as noise complaints, aggressive panhandlers or illegally parked cars — using an online portal that details offenses reported by residents and whether officers solved the problem.

“Those type of offenses are very important to the people who live in the neighborhood, so we want them to have the same attention,” Pollard told the editorial board.

Pollard made clear that the larger goal is to transform District J — one of the city’s poorest districts — into an area that can eventually cultivate even more economic opportunities for residents and services to meet people’s needs. While progress has been slow, we commend Pollard’s proactive approach to helping the city combat crime and make his district more livable. He deserves another term to see his vision through.

I’m not a big fan of CM Pollard, and I remain very curious as to why he has raised such a ridiculous amount of money for a race where he can’t possibly spend that much. I assume he’s stocking up for a future candidacy, it’s just not clear yet for what. Be that as it may, I did not do interviews in this race. I interviewed Pollard for his 2016 primary race in HD137, which you can listen to here (you can also see the basis of my dislike for CM Pollard in that post), and I interviewed his opponent Ivan Sanchez when he was a candidate for CD07 in 2018; you can listen to that here.

Over in District H, my district, the Chron endorsed Mario Castillo.

Mario Castillo

Mario Castillo, 37, grew up in the district behind Hollywood Cemetery near the I-45 feeder road. Castillo and his cousins would catch turtles and play paintball along Little White Oak Bayou. He’s a Texas A&M grad with degrees in political science and public health. As the former chief of staff for the outgoing council member and the executive director of a nonprofit focused on health equity, he’s prepared to get to work on Day One. He’s also served on boards for the YMCA, Houston LGBTQ+ Political Caucus, Houston Land Bank and Northside Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone. Oh, and he hosts a podcast that features interviews of different community leaders each episode.

All those experiences matter because Houston council members have very little real power. They mostly convene and facilitate. Castillo understands that his job would be to leverage every connection he’s got for his constituents.

On infrastructure, for example, Castillo told us he’d review all planned projects in the district and leverage every possible partner to add value. He pointed to his having played a role in bringing together city, county, management district and METRO funds with Northside TIRZ money to get wider sidewalks built along and near Quitman Street. Instead of focusing only on the immediate vicinity of a light rail stop, the project will connect schools, businesses, homes and parks.

The open secret about Houston is that there’s plenty of money available to fix most of our problems, but it sits siloed and uncoordinated. Houston’s lack of zoning has a positive side. It gives us our spunk and dynamism. The lack of organized thinking and failing to plan? That’s just waste. Castillo knows how to connect the dots.

[…]

Voters have another strong candidate in Cynthia Reyes-Revilla, 49, a real estate broker who helped organize the Near Northside after the murder of Josue Flores in 2016. She worked with a cadre of activists to support the 2017 passage of Texas Senate Bill 195 that boosts funding for school transportation options in unsafe neighborhoods and a city ordinance tightening regulation of bunkhouses. She also helped get restrictions on breaking up lots for townhouses in parts of the Near Northside. She has served on the Super Neighborhood Council and alongside Castillo on the board for the YMCA. While she’s more prepared than she was when she ran for this seat four years ago, Reyes-Revilla would face more of a learning curve than Castillo.

I agree that Castillo and Reyes-Revilla are the two top candidates for this seat. They’re the ones I interviewed: Castillo here, Reyes-Revilla here. Give them a listen if you haven’t already.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Endorsement watch: Pollard and Castillo

From the “I gave you a million bucks and this is the thanks I get?” department

This is buck wild.

Colony Ridge, a massive residential development north of Houston, has quickly taken center stage in Texas politics.

After weeks of reports in conservative media portraying the development as a “magnet for illegal immigrants,” followed by state Republican leaders expressing alarm, Gov. Greg Abbott has promised that Colony Ridge will be addressed in an upcoming special legislative session, saying “serious concerns have been raised.”

“We’re trying to put together as much information as possible so that I can add to the special session any issue that needs to be enforced in terms of a new law in the state of Texas, to make sure that we’re not going to have colonies like this in our state,” Abbott told radio host Dana Loesch on Monday.

The precise issues are unclear. Abbott suggested he is worried Colony Ridge has become a “no-go zone” where the state’s ban on “sanctuary cities” is not being enforced. But legal experts say there is no law against selling land to people who aren’t citizens and many of the more outlandish claims about the neighborhood have been accompanied with little or no evidence.

Abbott also said the state has issued subpoenas to the developers “to find out what’s going on financially.” And he said state environmental regulators are investigating Colony Ridge and will issue a report.

The development company, Terranos Houston, has dismissed suggestions that Colony Ridge is a haven for people in the country illegally as “slanderous” and “unsubstantiated.” Developer William Trey Harris, a major campaign donor to Abbott, told local media this week he is “a little disappointed in our state government that they are taking action based on lies and gossip.”

[…]

Harris, the developer, is a prominent Republican donor, particularly to the governor. He has given over $1 million to Abbott’s campaigns and also contributed to local politicians such as state Sen. Brandon Creighton and state Rep. William Metcalf, both of Conroe.

I’m a little disappointed, too, dude. A million bucks just doesn’t go as far as it used to now, does it?

That report was from late last week. Houston Landing added on this Monday.

It is unclear what action Abbott wants legislators to take on the development during the upcoming special session, but he said during the interview he is concerned Colony Ridge is flouting the state’s ban on so-called “sanctuary cities.”

Patrick, president of the Texas Senate, said he is considering holding hearings about Colony Ridge during the special session.

State lawmakers have been expecting to gather in Austin Oct. 9 for a special session centered around school vouchers, although Abbott has not released an agenda for the session.

In a letter to state lawmakers, John Harris, president of Colony Ridge, Inc., called the reports of thousands of immigrants in the country illegally and cartel activity nothing more than “salacious rumors and lies” and invited them to tour the community later this week to see for themselves.

“We have followed the law fully, including: screening all customers for potential terrorism/narcotics trafficking, following anti-discrimination laws, and adhering to all county ordinances, environmental regulations, and model subdivision rules,” Harris wrote. “Further, allegations of drug cartel connections to Colony Ridge are preposterous and unfounded.”

Liberty County officials say action is needed, but not to combat immigrants or to declare war on a drug cartel compound. Estimates on the community’s population vary, but officials agree the population has exploded in recent years and the county is struggling to keep up.

“We’re just seeing an influx of people,” said Billy Knox, a deputy chief with the Liberty County Sheriff’s Office. “I think some of the people are reporting there’s 75,000 people in here. … We only have three people out here for 75,000 people. The main concern is being able to provide deputies to cover the area.”

Knox said there may be cartel activity in Liberty County, but nothing that is out of the ordinary for any other county in the border state of Texas.

Liberty County Judge Jay Knight said, to his knowledge, the Colony Ridge developer has followed every local and state law.

“Yes, there’s been quite a bit written about it, and I think some of those things have probably been exaggerated,” said Knight, who is a Republican. “Everyone wants to live the American Dream, and this was an area that was opened up to persons that want to realize the American Dream in some form or fashion.”

The comments from Harris and county officials have done little to tamp down on the political fervor surrounding the development, which advertises in Spanish low-cost options to buy property and build a home.

Just as a note, Liberty County voted 79% for the Former Guy in 2020. Two guys elected to represent that county say this is a load of crap. Those leopards sure do get hungry, don’t they?

UPDATE: Here’s a followup story from the Trib that talks to one of the Harrises involved in the project (turns out there’s three of them, I had thought the two stories above were calling the same guy by two different names). Among other things, he has a truly touching faith in out state leadership:

[Trey] Harris said he was not sure if his development will be included on the special session’s call, but that he was working on gathering facts that refute the allegations to send to lawmakers.

“When they see that, this whole thing might just go away,” he said.

He said he believes that Abbott is “a good guy” who made a mistake by not gathering information before talking about the development publicly.

“I think he’s gonna know he made a mistake when the facts come out about what’s really going on here,” he said. “I’m curious to see how he reacts when he finds out he’s got egg on his face.”

That’s just adorable. Please do let me know how your faith in the ability of Republicans to learn and react to factual information works out for you.

UPDATE Colony Ridge is officially on the special session agenda. Like I said, a million bucks just doesn’t have the buying power it once did. But don’t worry, I’m sure Greg Abbott will see the error of his ways as soon as he understands what the true facts are.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

What some Mayoral candidates said to some Republicans

I have a few thoughts about this.

Houston mayoral candidates took aim at “feel-good” public safety initiatives such as gun buybacks and proposed plans to boost the city budget at a Friday forum organized by United Republicans of Harris County.

Early polls show Houston’s Republican voters, who make up about a third of the city electorate, favor state Sen. John Whitmire, a tough-on-crime Democrat. Meanwhile, Republican contenders MJ Khan and Jack Christie, both former council members, are seeking to consolidate conservative votes in a “field dominated by liberals,” as Khan put it.

Khan, former Metro Chair Gilbert Garcia and attorney Lee Kaplan were the only candidates to attend the United Republicans’ forum Friday night. In front of dozens at the Trini Mendenhall Community Center, the contenders criticized outgoing Mayor Sylvester Turner’s policies on issues ranging from public safety and street design to city finances and transparency.

“I’m a Democrat, but I’m running because I can’t take it anymore,” Garcia said, citing several federal investigations and corruption allegations during Turner’s tenure, which he mayor has rejected at various times. Garcia labeled all three attending candidates as a “fresh face” against mayoral front-runners Whitmire and U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, who he said would only perpetuate the existing insider culture at City Hall.

Kaplan, noting the uncertainty around the corruption accusations, instead went after Turner’s public safety plan. He dubbed the recent gun buyback events “boneheaded” and called Houston’s ShotSpotter system a “silly, bogus idea.” The other two concurred, pointing to a lack of evidence linking these initiatives to crime rate reduction.

“The city is not some corrupt socialistic organization. There’s a lot of people trying to do the right thing,” Kaplan said. But the next mayor needs to craft more rigorous policies to enhance public safety and city services, he said.

Khan, the only Republican on stage, said he would cut spending and vet every city dollar if elected. He also lamented the strained city-state relationship and denounced the Turner administration’s support for business closures during COVID-19, earning him a light round of applause from the audience.

Bike lanes faced a barrage of criticism from all candidates Friday night. Kaplan said Houston is still car-centric and “bikers shouldn’t control the city.” Khan agreed, adding that the current patchwork of dedicated bike lanes also present safety risks.

Garcia last week received rounds of cheers at a transit forum for championing alternative transportation methods before a cyclist-friendly crowd. But he underscored the rift between him and the pro-biking community Friday night and highlighted the need to scrutinize the “cannibalization of streets for bike lanes” in Houston.

“I can’t tell you how many people in the bike community have been trolling me, being mean and angry, all those things,” Garcia said. But due to the high costs of constructing bike lanes, he said the funds would be better spent on other causes such as public safety and drainage improvement.

In no particular order:

– It’s a little weird to call a Mayoral candidate event in which only three of the 17 candidates, none of whom are considered likely to be in the eventual runoff, a “candidate forum”. It just feels like something is missing. It’s great to hear from candidates – I do the interviews I do for a reason – but with such a small share of the field present you’re not getting anything like a full picture. Even if you dismiss the horde of no-names, this is less than half of the “viable” field. Just semantics maybe, but if I had attended this, I’d have come away at least a little disappointed.

– LOL at the idea that bikers “control” the city. Anyone who can say that with a straight face has probably not ridden a bike since they were in middle school.

– Also, as I’ve said before, that “vetting of every dollar” rhetoric is so old and unoriginal and just plain meaningless. We don’t care what’s on your new album, play that one hit that we all love again.

– The story refers to “early polls”, but I’m only aware of one public poll so far, and I hope by now we all understand the very limited value of a single poll, let alone one that is months old and pertaining to a race that is difficult to sample. I’m ready for there to be another poll, even a crappy one, just so that we can have another data point and stop pretending that this one poll really told us anything.

– That said, let’s assume that the poll is correct in that Whitmire and SJL are the clear frontrunners. Let’s also assume that SJL’s base of support is impregnable enough that she is assured a spot in the runoff. Whitmire, whose base includes Democrats and Republicans, might in theory be susceptible to his support declining if other candidates, at least two of which are actual Republicans, can chip away at that part of his base. If we posit that this is possible, and that Whitmire could lose ten or even fifteen points of support due to Republicans abandoning him, then the question is, who is in third place? And is that person likely to be the sole beneficiary of Whitmire’s hypothetical loss of Republican votes, thus putting him in position to maybe slip into the runoff? Or are those lost Republican voters likely to be divided up by the four main candidates vying for them (Khan and Christie and based on their appearance here Garcia and Kaplan) thus boosting them all by a couple of points and in the end leaving them all still well behind Whitmire? If you don’t have a clear answer for my first question, about who’s in third place, then I think you’ll agree the latter scenario is the more likely.

– Just curious what these candidates have been saying about these issues at campaign forums that are non-partisan or hosted by Democratic/progressive groups. Might be worth noting one or two of these quotes and then asking them about it at the next one.

– To be fair, the evidence we have strongly suggests that ShotSpotter is useless and should be abandoned. Not that this will help trim the budget in any way, since that’s spending on “public safety” and would have to be redirected to some other items in that part of the budget since cutting spending on public safety is now illegal thanks to the Lege. Not that any Mayoral candidate in my memory has ever called for any kind of scrutiny of the public safety budget, mind you. Reallocating ShotSpotter money to something else is called for and may end up as a better use of that funding. But no one should mistake it for shrinking expenditures in any way.

Posted in Election 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Intellectual property lawsuit against DeLorean dismissed after settlement reached

Whew.

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit accusing the heads of San Antonio-based DeLorean Motors ReImagined of stealing intellectual property from a previous employer, according to an Express-News report.

Last August, electric-vehicle maker Karma Automotive sued DeLorean CEO Joost de Vries and three other execs at the startup car company, claiming they stole trade secrets. The suit alleged the four — all of whom previously worked at California-based Karma — stole trade secrets and used them to establish DeLorean.

DeLorean is working to bring back the ’80s sports car featured in the Back to the Future movies as a an electric vehicle.

On Sept. 8, Judge Keith Ellison approved a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, meaning the suit can’t be refiled, according to the Express-News. De Vries told the paper that his company and Karma reached an out-of-court agreement.

[…]

Earlier this year, the startup cut the number of reservation spots for its Alpha 5 model from 9,251 to 4,000, citing supply chain bottlenecks, Barron’s reports. The company has said it expects to deliver its first models sometime in 2025 to customers who made a $3,500 deposit.

See here, here, and here for the background. As before, that Express-News story is paywalled, so this and Texas Public Radio is what you get. Hopefully the next story of interest will be about the first cars rolling off their assembly lines.

Posted in Legal matters, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Intellectual property lawsuit against DeLorean dismissed after settlement reached